1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. ALT.CONSPIRACY.JFK

  • Re: Hank throws in the towel (implicitly) re Whaley and Ball BOTH "mis-

    From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Mon Feb 19 15:15:19 2024
    On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 13:00:45 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
    wrote:

    On Monday, February 19, 2024 at 3:51:08?PM UTC-5, Donald Willis wrote:
    On Monday, February 19, 2024 at 9:16:33?AM UTC-8, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 08:58:39 -0800 (PST), Donald Willis
    <willisd...@gmail.com> wrote:

    Huckster's been throwing in the towel for a long time now...

    He's a coward that can't answer evidential questions...
    So I see

    I see that you guys have your own little worlds going on.

    Trying to defend a coward when you can't cite his answer doesn't
    convince anyone.

    Of course, *YOU* can't convince anyone that you're not a coward
    either:

    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Mon Feb 19 15:35:15 2024
    On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 15:26:12 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
    wrote:

    Chickenshit ran AGAIN!

    What a proven coward!

    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Mon Feb 19 09:16:29 2024
    On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 08:58:39 -0800 (PST), Donald Willis <willisdonald824@gmail.com> wrote:

    Huckster's been throwing in the towel for a long time now...

    He's a coward that can't answer evidential questions...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Tue Feb 20 06:55:06 2024
    On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 16:16:11 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
    wrote:

    Chickenshit ran AGAIN!

    What a proven coward!

    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)