• Re: Question for Ben or Gil:

    From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Thu Feb 15 06:02:31 2024
    On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 04:05:46 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
    wrote:

    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to gjjmail1202@gmail.com on Thu Feb 15 06:02:31 2024
    On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 04:14:01 -0800 (PST), Gil Jesus
    <gjjmail1202@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Thursday, February 15, 2024 at 7:05:48?AM UTC-5, Bud wrote:
    < his usual nonsense and insults >

    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT ?
    Yes or no ?

    He can't answer. He desperately wants to say *Yes* - but then he'd
    have to explain who it was BEHIND JFK... since JFK's back wound has a
    similar oval shape.

    So in order not to look stupid, he prefers to look like a coward.

    He CERTAINLY cannot admit that a fellow believer wrote a silly
    argument. But that's what happened.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to chuckschuyler123@gmail.com on Thu Feb 15 06:02:31 2024
    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 17:20:15 -0800 (PST), Chuck Schuyler <chuckschuyler123@gmail.com> wrote:

    Years go, why didn't you guys just set up an email group and Cc each other about various conspiracy topics if you're not interested in reading what your critics write?

    NO ONE except you two and maybe Gentleman Don are going to participate here after 2/22/24.

    In fact, you could set up the email chain NOW or use Messenger on Facebook or something and not need to deal with any of your critics.

    Why wait?


    As you absolutely REFUSE to answer questions... what made you think
    you deserve any answers?

    Watch folks, as Chuckles runs again.

    As he does...

    EVERY

    SINGLE

    TIME!!!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Thu Feb 15 06:57:09 2024
    On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 06:20:26 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
    wrote:

    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to chuckschuyler123@gmail.com on Fri Feb 16 07:01:39 2024
    On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 18:11:45 -0800 (PST), Chuck Schuyler <chuckschuyler123@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Thursday, February 15, 2024 at 5:16:36?AM UTC-6, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Wednesday, February 14, 2024 at 8:20:16?PM UTC-5, Chuck Schuyler wrote:

    Years go, why didn't you guys just set up an email group and Cc each other about various conspiracy topics if you're not interested in reading what your critics write?

    Because the world has access to Usenet newsgroups. It doesn't have access to our private conversations.

    Name a "critic" of yours that you are interested in reading or hearing from.


    None... **ALL** of you are liars and cowards.


    We're trying to get our message out to the world, not to each other.

    What message, Gil? You all have a DIFFERENT point of view.


    Not a single critic denies that there was a conspiracy.


    Countless websites, blogs, books, articles, YouTube documentaries,
    movies, television shows, etc. have tackled this subject from all
    sides, not to mention several MAJOR investigations, and yet you feel
    YOUR MESSAGE--that some people did something on 11/22/63--needs to get
    out there?


    You indict yourself.


    Why on earth would we go private when we have the usenet ?
    That's a pretty stupid question.
    NO ONE except you two and maybe Gentleman Don are going to participate here after 2/22/24.

    Not true. Anyone in the world who has access to Usenet newsgroups using a newsreader and NNTP server other than Google will be able to participate.

    You'll block anyone who presses you for an explanation for what happened on 11/22/63.


    How silly!! We're HAPPY to explain what you can't.


    You're assuming that no one in the world pays for Usenet newsgroup access. That's not true.


    I don't assume that at all. I have read that Usenet has really faded in popularity.


    Yet you're still here. You destroy your own arguments. How STUPID of
    you!


    Plus, our posts to a.c.j. will appear in search engines, while posts in Google Groups do not.
    In fact, you could set up the email chain NOW or use Messenger on Facebook or something and not need to deal with any of your critics.
    We will be able to see the posts of our opponents who have not been blocked.

    Like?


    Stick around and we'll answer your question.


    Insulting jackasses like yourself who have nothing of value to contribute and have no credibility will be blocked. ( from my screen, I can't speak for Ben )

    "Of value to contribute" means ...


    Being able to explain your beliefs.


    My posts are seen on several different formats, including X ( formerly Twitter ) , Facebook, several JFK forums and I've appeared more than a half dozen times on internet podcasts.
    My essays and videos have received world-wide exposure. My writings have been sources for several different authors.
    A search for "gil jesus jfk" on any search engine will reveal my contributions to the JFK assassination community.

    You've contributed nothing...


    Lies do not an argument make.


    What have you Lone Nutters accomplished in your many years here ?

    My accomplishments...


    Can't be seen here.


    Not a damned thing. And now, as your source of "entertainment" is fading into the sunset, the best you morons can come up with is a daily countdown from 10 by BT George.
    I'm surprised that he could count that high.

    I've got my new newsreader already set up. I've tested it and will be using it starting Feb. 22nd.

    So why would we leave a world wide audience for private messages or private groups ?
    That's a stupid move only a knucklehead like you would take.

    In the final analysis, history will show that in the end, you Lone Nutters finally surrendered.

    You never put up a case to examine to "surrender" to...


    Lies can't convince anyone...


    That when it came to putting your money where your mouths were, your loyalty to your faith wasn't worth a few dollars a month.

    I'm not surprised. Cowards are usually quitters and quitters are usually cowards.

    Quit what?


    You see? You're incapable of honest debate - you argue the obvious,
    and pretend that you're not quiting the forum.


    And even assholes like yourselves can see that when your insults can't reach the eyes of your intended targets, it's not worth it.

    Why wait?

    Why switch when Google is free and still available ?


    (Deleted most of Chuckles logical fallacies...)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to gjjmail1202@gmail.com on Fri Feb 16 07:01:39 2024
    On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 03:40:39 -0800 (PST), Gil Jesus
    <gjjmail1202@gmail.com> wrote:

    ...
    Let me give you some advice:

    What ever topic you choose to insult and tease your opponents on, make sure you know something about the topic.
    Because when it comes to the JFK assassination, you don't know your ass from a hole in the ground.

    The only topic that Chuckles is knowledgeable on is his own biography.

    But no-one's interested in that.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Fri Feb 16 10:20:33 2024
    On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 10:04:05 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
    wrote:

    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)