On Tuesday, February 13, 2024 at 1:58:00?PM UTC-5, Donald Willis wrote:
No more Hank S? Wait a minute--celebration time!
Yes. Nobody to point out that pesky information you`d rather ignore...
On Tuesday, February 13, 2024 at 3:30:47?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 11:46:34 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Tuesday, February 13, 2024 at 1:58:00?PM UTC-5, Donald Willis wrote:
No more Hank S? Wait a minute--celebration time!
Yes. Nobody to point out that pesky information you`d rather ignore...
Such as:
Fringe reset.
So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.
It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)
So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.
Chickenshit's been running for months, and he'll **NEVER** answer
this. He loses...
On Tuesday, February 13, 2024 at 3:30:47?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 11:46:34 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Tuesday, February 13, 2024 at 1:58:00?PM UTC-5, Donald Willis wrote:
No more Hank S? Wait a minute--celebration time!
Yes. Nobody to point out that pesky information you`d rather ignore...
Such as:
Fringe reset.
So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.
It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)
So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.
Chickenshit's been running for months, and he'll **NEVER** answer
this. He loses...
On Tuesday, February 13, 2024 at 3:30:47?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 11:46:34 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Tuesday, February 13, 2024 at 1:58:00?PM UTC-5, Donald Willis wrote:
No more Hank S? Wait a minute--celebration time!
Yes. Nobody to point out that pesky information you`d rather ignore...
Such as:
Fringe reset.
So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.
It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)
So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.
Chickenshit's been running for months, and he'll **NEVER** answer
this. He loses...
On Tuesday, February 13, 2024 at 5:18:51?PM UTC-5, Donald Willis wrote:
Sorry I left you out... No more Bud? Celebration time! And I can't forget John "The Wide-Open-Window Weasel" Corbett, gone. Celebration time!
ROFLMAO, what is this ?
"Gentleman" Don Willis getting in some parting shots ?
Has hell frozen over ?
ROFLMAO.
No, he just sees you Lone Nutters like the rest of us see you: as assholes. >He's just too nice to have called it.
Me, I call them the way I see them and I'll be celebrating the end of your foolishness and insults.
You Nutters were never interested in this case. You only came in here to "entertain" yourselves by insulting other people.
That's because you're better than everybody else.
You don't need to look at the documents. You don't need to read the testimony. Because you believe what you've been told.
How do you know who your daddy was ? Because your momma told you so.
But momma's not always right, as the "Maury Show" has proven.
You're smarter than everybody else. You're more knowledgeable than everybody else.
But you can't answer 40 questions, many of them requiring a simple "yes" or "no" answer.
Other questions you run from, claiming they've been answered but unable to cite where that is the case.
You're liars, you're deceivers and you're cowards, afraid of the evidence.
No matter how much evidence is presented to you, you deny everything.
You refuse to click on the links and look at the evidence.
You are among the most closed-minded people I've ever encountered on the internet.
You have YOUR truth: "The Warren Commission said it, I believe it and that settles it."
That's your opinion and I respect that.
What I don't respect is your constant insults, lies and denials.
But your time for coming in just to insult those whom you don't agree with is growing short.
You COULD end your time here by discussing the evidence, but you won't. >Because as the Google archives will show, you don't have any class.
No, I won't be misty-eyed to see these lice go away.
February 22nd can't come soon enough for me.
On Tuesday, February 13, 2024 at 5:14:05?PM UTC-5, Bud wrote:
Just as soon as you stipulate that I get to decide when something has been proven, and when something has been answered.
You don't get to decide anything.
You only get to prove what you say is true.
And you're not very good at that.
In fact, you've failed miserably at posting citations proving questions have been answered.
Congratulations.
On Tuesday, February 13, 2024 at 1:58:00?PM UTC-5, Donald Willis wrote:
No more Hank S? Wait a minute--celebration time!
Hi Don! Don’t start the party without me. ;)
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 128:04:51 |
| Calls: | 6,663 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 12,212 |
| Messages: | 5,335,189 |