• Re: Just 10 Days Left For The Cowards To Post!

    From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Mon Feb 12 14:12:49 2024
    On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 06:31:54 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
    wrote:

    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to hsienzant@aol.com on Tue Feb 13 06:09:25 2024
    On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 16:11:23 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
    <hsienzant@aol.com> wrote:

    On Monday, February 12, 2024 at 9:28:23?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
    Title says it all.

    You are stopping posting?

    How silly!

    Just like Huckster will pretend he's answered this:

    You've claimed that the "A.B.C.D." in the Autopsy Report is the
    description of the *location* of the large head wound.

    Yet you refuse time and time again from QUOTING the preceding
    paragraph that describes what this ACTUALLY is. Why is that?

    You've also claimed that the prosectors dissected the throat wound.

    Why do you continue to refuse to cite any evidence for this?

    Why have you CONSISTENTLY run away each time I raise this issue?

    Now you've quite stupidly insisted that the bullet entered JFK's back,
    and exited the back of his head.

    More cowardice, more stupidity, more dishonesty.

    Are you proud of yourself?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to gjjmail1202@gmail.com on Tue Feb 13 06:09:25 2024
    On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 03:22:35 -0800 (PST), Gil Jesus
    <gjjmail1202@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Monday, February 12, 2024 at 9:28:23?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
    Title says it all.

    If you notice, they never start a thread.
    They only respond to threads other people start. And most of those responses do not include evidence.
    That's because they don't know the case and they're too lazy to look stuff up.

    After the beating they've taken over the years, it's almost humane for Google to put them out of their misery.
    I, for one, will not be sorry to see them go. Having a battle of wits with them is like going to war against an unarmed person.
    And for those that are not leaving, I've already blocked your silliness on my new newsreader.
    I've taken that liberty in advance, because your responses are as worthless as your insults.

    For me, a new day will dawn on February 22nd.
    The loyal Lone Nutters who remain will have their posts ignored and the rest will fall by the wayside.
    Either way, no more lone nut trolls on my screen. Can't wait.

    This simply goes to show that the cowards are perfectly willing to
    tell lies and post logical fallacies as long as it doesn't cost them
    anything.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Tue Feb 13 06:09:25 2024
    On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 05:46:20 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
    wrote:

    You guys have you're own world of cowardice...

    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)