On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 20:23:40 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
<hsienzant@aol.com> wrote:

On Monday, November 29, 2021 at 9:29:00?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:

On Sat, 27 Nov 2021 09:03:11 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
<hsie...@aol.com> wrote:

When a post moves from just 93 lines to 1255 lines in response, you
can be sure it's a Gish Gallup.

So I deleted it all without bothering to read it...

Huckster will cry...

No...

Yes.

The proof that you're a coward:

You've claimed that the "A.B.C.D." in the Autopsy Report is the
description of the *location* of the large head wound.

Yet you refuse time and time again from QUOTING the preceding
paragraph that describes what this ACTUALLY is. Why is that?

You've also claimed that the prosectors dissected the throat wound.

Why do you continue to refuse to cite any evidence for this?

Why have you CONSISTENTLY run away each time I raise this issue?

Now you've quite stupidly insisted that the bullet entered JFK's back,
and exited the back of his head.

More cowardice, more stupidity, more dishonesty.

Are you proud of yourself?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)