On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 05:59:03 -0800 (PST), Chuck Schuyler <chuckschuyler123@gmail.com> wrote:

On Tuesday, February 6, 2024 at 7:31:33?AM UTC-6, Gil Jesus wrote:

https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/frontal-head-wound.mp4

Fringe reset.

Not once... not a SINGLE TIME - has Chuckles ever cited for a "fringe
reset"...

There is no evidence of a frontal shot.

That's a simple lie. The first contemporary reports spoke of the
entry wound in JFK's throat.

Lies won't convince anyone, Chuckles... you need to do better.

Read the original autopsy report.

The prosectors never dissected the neck wound - which was one of the
frontal wounds.

And, of course, you don't believe the Autopsy Report.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 01:53:08 -0800 (PST), Gil Jesus
<gjjmail1202@gmail.com> wrote:

On Tuesday, February 6, 2024 at 8:59:05?AM UTC-5, Chuck Schuyler wrote:

There is no evidence of a frontal shot.

Spoken like a true coward who didn't watch the video because he's afraid of the truth.
If you'd watched the video, you'd know why it wasn't in the autopsy report.

Read the original autopsy report.

I did read the autopsy report. In fact, it's one of the over 4,000 files I have on the case.
Did YOU read it ?

Apparently not, because if you did, you'd know that the Back Of Head ( BOH ) autopsy photo does not match the autopsy report.
https://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/30098-why-the-governments-case-against-oswald-is-bs-conclusion/?do=findComment&comment=527075

Why is that, Chuck ?

Chuckles is a "hit and run" poster - he rarely sticks around to defend
his lies...

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 02:57:16 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
wrote:

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 21:59:46 -0800 (PST), Chuck Schuyler <chuckschuyler123@gmail.com> wrote:

On Wednesday, February 7, 2024 at 3:53:09?AM UTC-6, Gil Jesus wrote:

On Tuesday, February 6, 2024 at 8:59:05?AM UTC-5, Chuck Schuyler wrote:

There is no evidence of a frontal shot.

Spoken like a true coward who didn't watch the video because he's afraid of the truth.

The truth that something else happened on 11/22/63? Sorry, that doesn't cut it.

The truth that there *IS* evidence for a frontal shot is something you
can't be honest enough to admit.

If you'd watched the video, you'd know why it wasn't in the autopsy report.

"Back and to the left" has been a frequent discussion, Gil. The autopsy doctors dealt with science, not witness impressions about the direction of the shots.

The autopsy doctors obeyed orders, and refused to examine a bullet
wound they knew nothing of during the autopsy.

The Parkland doctors... well, you don't believe expert opinion...

Read the original autopsy report.

I did read the autopsy report. In fact, it's one of the over 4,000 files I have on the case.

Logical fallacy deleted.

Did YOU read it ?

Yes.

Where was the large wound, devoid of bone and scalp, located on the
head?

Apparently not, because if you did, you'd know that the Back Of Head ( BOH ) autopsy photo does not match the autopsy report.

Sez you.

Support your claim. What part of the occipital is *NOT* in the back
of the head, and visible in the BOH photo?

https://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/30098-why-the-governments-case-against-oswald-is-bs-conclusion/?do=findComment&comment=527075

Why is that, Chuck ?

Logical fallacies deleted.

Feb 22 can't come soon enough!

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thu, 8 Feb 2024 02:34:41 -0800 (PST), Gil Jesus
<gjjmail1202@gmail.com> wrote:

On Thursday, February 8, 2024 at 12:59:47?AM UTC-5, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
< more stupid comments, insults and questions >

Apparently not, because if you did, you'd know that the Back Of Head ( BOH ) autopsy photo does not match the autopsy report.

Sez you.

No, sez the evidence you refuse to look at.
It's YOUR evidence, Chuck. It's the evidence you support. Why can't you answer a simple question about the conflicts in it ?

https://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/30098-why-the-governments-case-against-oswald-is-bs-conclusion/?do=findComment&comment=527075

Amusingly, there's not one believer who will publicly agree that much
of the evidence conflicts.

Even such obvious examples as whether or not the paper in the "paper
bag" matched the paper at the TSBD.

Cowardice runs rampant among believers...

Speaking of evidence, in what year can we expect you to post some ?
Or will you go down in USENET history as the flaming asshole who ran from the truth and posted nothing but insults ?
Time is running out, Chuck. In two weeks, your legacy of an asshole who comes here to get his jollies from insulting people will be cemented on the internet.

Will you finally post evidence, or will you continue to accomplish nothing by running like the coward you are ?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thu, 8 Feb 2024 04:38:49 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
wrote:

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thu, 8 Feb 2024 08:07:42 -0800 (PST), Chuck Schuyler <chuckschuyler123@gmail.com> wrote:

On Thursday, February 8, 2024 at 4:34:43?AM UTC-6, Gil Jesus wrote:

On Thursday, February 8, 2024 at 12:59:47?AM UTC-5, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
< more stupid comments, insults and questions >

Apparently not, because if you did, you'd know that the Back Of Head ( BOH ) autopsy photo does not match the autopsy report.

Sez you.

No, sez the evidence you refuse to look at.

I've looked at it.

And been completely unable to explain it.

And people far smarter than you or I have looked at it.

None of whom have explained it.

Your logical fallacy...

Nope.

I believe that if we went back to the early 90s on Usenet regarding
this discussion, we could find THOUSANDS of posts on this subject.

You *CONSTANTLY* make this claim, and yet, you've not a *SINGLE TIME*
ever cited for your claim.

No stupid, it's NEVER been explained by any believer... early 90's or
at ANYTIME.

It's YOUR evidence, Chuck. It's the evidence you support. Why can't you answer a simple question about the conflicts in it ?

Why...

And Chuckles runs again.

As he does...

EVERY

SINGLE

TIME!

https://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/30098-why-the-governments-case-against-oswald-is-bs-conclusion/?do=findComment&comment=527075

Speaking of evidence, in what year can we expect you to post some ?

Evidence of WHAT...

Who killed JFK. Getting senile?

Or will you go down in USENET history as the flaming asshole who ran from the truth and posted nothing but insults ?

Lol. Usenet history? Ran from WHAT truth?

The list is long. Here in this thread, it's your inability to
acknowledge that the Autopsy Report conflicts with the alleged BOH
photo.

Time is running out, Chuck. In two weeks, your legacy of an asshole who comes here to get his jollies from insulting people will be cemented on the internet.

I think ...

No, you don't.

Will you finally post evidence, or will you continue to accomplish nothing by running like the coward you are ?

I will continue to accomplish nothing....

Finally! Chuckles slips up and tells the truth.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thu, 8 Feb 2024 09:30:20 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
wrote:

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thu, 8 Feb 2024 09:45:28 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
<hsienzant@aol.com> wrote:

On Thursday, February 8, 2024 at 12:00:00?PM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:

On Thursday, February 8, 2024 at 11:20:28?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:

On Thu, 8 Feb 2024 08:07:42 -0800 (PST), Chuck Schuyler
<chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Thursday, February 8, 2024 at 4:34:43?AM UTC-6, Gil Jesus wrote:

Will you finally post evidence, or will you continue to accomplish nothing by running like the coward you are ?

I will continue to accomplish nothing....

Finally! Chuckles slips up and tells the truth.

Over the last 20 or 25 years in this newsgroup, these people as a group have done a piss-poor job of defending the Warren Commission's case against Oswald.

According to you. But you’re biased in favor of your own believes...

Isn't this the same moron who just got through pointing out a
mispelling by me?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thu, 8 Feb 2024 16:43:18 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
<hsienzant@aol.com> wrote:

On Thu, 8 Feb 2024 09:45:28 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
<hsienzant@aol.com> wrote:

On Thursday, February 8, 2024 at 12:00:00?PM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:

On Thursday, February 8, 2024 at 11:20:28?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:

On Thu, 8 Feb 2024 08:07:42 -0800 (PST), Chuck Schuyler
<chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Thursday, February 8, 2024 at 4:34:43?AM UTC-6, Gil Jesus wrote:

Will you finally post evidence, or will you continue to accomplish nothing by running like the coward you are ?

I will continue to accomplish nothing....

Finally! Chuckles slips up and tells the truth.

Over the last 20 or 25 years in this newsgroup, these people as a group have done a piss-poor job of defending the Warren Commission's case against Oswald.

According to you. But you’re biased in favor of your own believes...

Isn't this the same moron who just got through pointing out a
mispelling by me?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Fri, 9 Feb 2024 05:09:58 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
wrote:

On Friday, February 9, 2024 at 5:24:41?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:

On Thursday, February 8, 2024 at 6:03:37?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:

On Thu, 8 Feb 2024 09:45:28 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
<hsie...@aol.com> wrote:

According to you. But you’re biased in favor of your own believes...

Isn't this the same moron who just got through pointing out a mispelling by me?

This is why I don't respond to them. Their offerings are nothing more than bullshit.

Often they apply reason and critical thinking:

Go for it:

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Fri, 9 Feb 2024 02:24:39 -0800 (PST), Gil Jesus
<gjjmail1202@gmail.com> wrote:

On Thursday, February 8, 2024 at 6:03:37?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:

On Thu, 8 Feb 2024 09:45:28 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
<hsie...@aol.com> wrote:

According to you. But you’re biased in favor of your own believes...

Isn't this the same moron who just got through pointing out a mispelling by me?

This is why I don't respond to them. Their offerings are nothing more than bullshit.
I don't have time to participate in a bullshit session.
I don't have time for their nonsensical speculation, comments, insults and questions.
I deal in official records and I expect those who want to have a civil debate on the evidence to do so as well.
These people are frauds. They're only here for "entertainment".

Engaging them with evidence is like trying to explain quantum physics to a four year old.

Can't wait for Feb. 22nd, when the adults take over the discussion.

Amusingly, Huckster can't recognize his hypocrisy... Matthew 7:3-5
comes to mind.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Fri, 9 Feb 2024 08:40:35 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
<hsienzant@aol.com> wrote:

On Thursday, February 8, 2024 at 12:00:00?PM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:

On Thursday, February 8, 2024 at 11:20:28?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:

On Thu, 8 Feb 2024 08:07:42 -0800 (PST), Chuck Schuyler
<chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Thursday, February 8, 2024 at 4:34:43?AM UTC-6, Gil Jesus wrote:

Will you finally post evidence, or will you continue to accomplish nothing by running like the coward you are ?

I will continue to accomplish nothing....

Finally! Chuckles slips up and tells the truth.

Over the last 20 or 25 years in this newsgroup, these people as a group have done a piss-poor job of defending the Warren Commission's case against Oswald.

According to you. But you’re biased in favor of your own believes...

Isn't this the same moron who just got through pointing out a
mispelling by me?


It's my believe that you're a moron, Huckster.

(Huckster can't read and reason, either...)

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)