• The Cowardice Continues!

    From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Mon Feb 5 15:35:10 2024
    But with the excuse that they can't get free access to this forum -
    quite a few believers have already disappeared from here...

    That tells you all you need to know about believers...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to chuckschuyler123@gmail.com on Mon Feb 5 17:01:29 2024
    On Mon, 5 Feb 2024 15:47:20 -0800 (PST), Chuck Schuyler <chuckschuyler123@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Monday, February 5, 2024 at 5:35:15?PM UTC-6, Ben Holmes wrote:

    But with the excuse that they can't get free access to this forum -
    quite a few believers have already disappeared from here...

    It's not an "excuse" about "free access," as I pay for plenty of
    other things each month that I'm interested in. You and Gil aren't
    worth the price of paying for some subscription newsreader to post
    here, so it's time to flush you down the toilet. Bye bye.


    Your whining doesn't change the actual facts.


    That tells you all you need to know about believers...

    Gil claims he's going to block my posts, so I'd be left
    communicating with you, and you constantly erase what I write. Time to
    let this dusty little corner of the internet go.


    Are you stupid? I can't delete a SINGLE CHARACTER of anything you
    post. I can only delete your nonsense in **MY** response.


    If anyone has a "free" site to talk about the JFK assassination, I
    might participate there, but I'm not paying one penny to post here and
    find out my posts are being blocked anyways.


    You merely support what I said.


    Tell us where Dealey Plaza is... Let's see if you know anything about
    this case...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Tue Feb 6 07:44:06 2024
    On Mon, 5 Feb 2024 17:13:00 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
    wrote:

    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to chuckschuyler123@gmail.com on Tue Feb 6 07:44:06 2024
    On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 06:48:15 -0800 (PST), Chuck Schuyler <chuckschuyler123@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Tuesday, February 6, 2024 at 5:35:34?AM UTC-6, Gil Jesus wrote:

    On Monday, February 5, 2024 at 9:43:47?PM UTC-5, Chuck Schuyler wrote:

    As Trump would say, "Sad."

    What's really "sad" Chuck, is people like you. What kind of a grown man makes fun of another man's name ?

    I dunno. Have you called me Chuckles?


    Lie, Chuckles, and tell the world who started it.


    Congratulations Chuck, you've proven that you're the perfect definition of an asshole.

    Glad I'm still irritating you right until 02/22/24.


    We're throwing a party on that date.


    It's sad that you refuse to see the truth.

    The truth that on 11/22/63 some people did something?


    Coward, aren't you?


    It's sad that you believe that there is no corruption in government.

    There is corruption in government.


    But not the WCR, right?


    It's sad that you believe that cops don't lie under oath.

    Cops lie under oath.


    But not Lt Day, right?


    It's sad that you believe that evidence can't be tampered with.

    Evidence can be tampered with.


    But not CE399, or the Tippit shells... right?


    It's sad that you believe an accused is guilty because his accuser says so.

    The accused legally have the presumption of innocence.


    Not according to you, or any other believer...


    It's sad that you believe that he has no right to a defense

    "He" (Oswald) would've had a right to a defense at trial.


    But not otherwise. Quite the slime, aren't you Chuckles?


    and that anybody who questions the case against him suffers from "conspiracism".

    Not "anyone" ...


    You can't cite any exceptions...


    It's sad that you believe that an accused is guilty until proven innocent.

    I believe you are innocent until proven guilty...


    No you don't. Provably a lie. https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/nF50UjAjtSM/m/dYVBS9TcAAAJ


    That's just not how the American justice system works Chuck and anybody who supports that type of justice system is Un-American.


    Logical fallacy deleted.


    It's sad that yours is a prejudice based on hate.


    Logical fallacy deleted.


    When you refer to me as Oswald's "Johnny Cochran", you prove it.


    Logical fallacy deleted.


    It's sad that every post you make is some sort of an insult towards somebody.


    Logical fallacy deleted.


    It's sad that you refuse to post evidence.


    Logical fallacy deleted.


    It's sad that you ignore the inconsistencies in the evidence.


    Logical fallacy deleted.


    It's sad that you run from the evidence like a screaming hyena, then turn and attack the messenger because you don't like the message.

    No one runs from you guys.


    What time did JFK's body arrive at Bethesda?


    It's sad that the record of your childishness and ignorance of the subject matter will be permanently available to anyone with a search engine.


    Logical fallacy deleted.


    It's sad that any one searching the usenet will be able to see that after all these years, you've accomplished nothing here.

    I agree...

    It's sad that while you cry time after time like a baby for a "scenario", history has shown that there's no alternative scenario that will satisfy you.


    Logical fallacy deleted.


    So what's the point of trying to explain it to you ?


    Logical fallacy deleted.


    Suffice it to say that this was a political murder to remove John Kennedy from office.


    Logical fallacy deleted.


    He was warned not to go to Dallas because it was too dangerous.


    Logical fallacy deleted.


    He went to Dallas against those warnings and he was assassinated.


    Logical fallacy deleted.


    And it wasn't by Oswald.


    Logical fallacy deleted.


    It's sad that you can't see that in the current political atmosphere in America, the Democrats have tried everything in their power to first stop Donald Trump from being elected in 2016,
    then impeaching him TWICE without his having committed a crime, rigging the election of 2020 to get him out of office, indicting him for crimes
    they have yet proven, now Democrat donors are keeping Haley in the GOP primaries in the hope that Trump goes to prison and she gets the nomination by default.


    Logical fallacy deleted.


    Then they'll have their two candidates running against each other and it won't matter who wins.
    They'll have their candidate in the White House.


    Logical fallacy deleted.


    They've done everything but put a bullet in Trump, although that HAS been mentioned.
    The corruption in Washington is so great and widespread that no one from outside the political establishment will be allowed to be President.
    That's American politics.
    They got Trump out with ballots.
    They got Kennedy out with bullets.


    Logical fallacy deleted.


    It's sad that you can't see that.


    Logical fallacy deleted.


    But you go ahead and believe in pink unicorns and sugar plum fairies.


    Logical fallacy deleted.


    You go ahead and believe that Sadaam had weapons of mass destruction.


    Logical fallacy deleted.


    You go ahead and believe that Russia interferred in the 2016 election.


    Logical fallacy deleted.


    You go ahead and believe that the Corona virus came from a market.


    Logical fallacy deleted.


    You go ahead and believe that you can't get the virus if you get the "Fauci-Ouchie" or its boosters.


    Logical fallacy deleted.


    You go ahead and believe that men can get pregnant.

    Only women can get pregnant.


    Ouch! Even Chuckles can accidently stumble on truth!!


    You go ahead and believe that there are more than two genders.

    There are two genders.

    Ditto.


    Keep those borders open Chuck. The country needs more people to vote Democrat and keep the "swamp" in power.


    Logical fallacy deleted.


    And by the way, don't forget to make sure those pedophiles dressed in drag have access to our kindergarten children.


    Logical fallacy deleted.


    Why ? Because the government says so. And the government is always right.


    Logical fallacy deleted.


    SMH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to hsienzant@aol.com on Wed Feb 7 06:08:24 2024
    On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 16:43:21 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
    <hsienzant@aol.com> wrote:

    On Tuesday, February 6, 2024 at 6:35:34?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Monday, February 5, 2024 at 9:43:47?PM UTC-5, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
    As Trump would say, "Sad."
    What's really "sad" Chuck, is people like you. What kind of a grown man makes fun of another man's name ?

    He goes by the name of Ben Holmes.
    He calls me “Huckster”, Charles, “Chuckles”, etc.
    He does this with anyone he disagrees with.

    Huckster knows for a FACT that I've never changed anyone's name until
    they did. So he's lying by omission. He's also a proven coward:

    You've claimed that the "A.B.C.D." in the Autopsy Report is the
    description of the *location* of the large head wound.

    Yet you refuse time and time again from QUOTING the preceding
    paragraph that describes what this ACTUALLY is. Why is that?

    You've also claimed that the prosectors dissected the throat wound.

    Why do you continue to refuse to cite any evidence for this?

    Why have you CONSISTENTLY run away each time I raise this issue?

    Now you've quite stupidly insisted that the bullet entered JFK's back,
    and exited the back of his head.

    More cowardice, more stupidity, more dishonesty.

    Are you proud of yourself?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)