On Sun, 4 Feb 2024 16:09:13 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
wrote:

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Mon, 5 Feb 2024 04:15:01 -0800 (PST), Gil Jesus
<gjjmail1202@gmail.com> wrote:

On Monday, February 5, 2024 at 5:55:35?AM UTC-5, Bud wrote:

1. Brennan didn`t say Oswald was wearing a different shirt when he saw him in the window and when he saw him in the lineup.

You sure about that ?

No, he's simply lying. He really has no clue.

Let me post that testimony again:

MR. BRENNAN. That he was not dressed in the same clothes that I saw the man in the window.

MR. BELIN. You mean with reference to the trousers or THE SHIRT ?

MR. BRENNAN. Well, NOT PARTICULARLY EITHER. He just didn't have he same clothes on. ( 3 H 161 )

He wasn't the only witness that described the assassin's clothing as
different from what Oswald was wearing...

But believers believe... just not the evidence.

2. Oswald may not have been wearing the shirt at the time he shot Kennedy (and there is evidence to that effect).

May not have ? Sounds like you're speculating. Citation ? Source ? Show us that evidence you claim exists.

Don't hold your breath. Chickenshit *can't*.

3. Fibers that got on the rifle from contact made weeks earlier would still be incriminating, the transfer didn`t have to occur on the day of the assassination.

You're speculating again. So when did the fibers get on the shirt ?
Show us your evidence that the shirt had contact with the rifle before November 22nd.

<snicker>

The *only* evidence that Oswald ever touched that weapon was
manufactured.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Mon, 5 Feb 2024 09:24:51 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
wrote:

Do you ever support anything you say?

Clearly, you don't:

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Mon, 5 Feb 2024 09:23:42 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
wrote:

On Monday, February 5, 2024 at 7:15:03?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:

On Monday, February 5, 2024 at 5:55:35?AM UTC-5, Bud wrote:

1. Brennan didn`t say Oswald was wearing a different shirt when he saw him in the window and when he saw him in the lineup.

You sure about that ? Let me post that testimony again:
MR. BRENNAN. That he was not dressed in the same clothes that I saw the man in the window.
MR. BELIN. You mean with reference to the trousers or THE SHIRT ?

MR. BRENNAN. Well, NOT PARTICULARLY EITHER. He just didn't have he same clothes on. ( 3 H 161 )

Where doe he say Oswald had a different shirt on when he saw him in the window and when he saw him in the lineup?

Does the Sun shine where you live?

Or are you a moron?

You're clearly terrified of this:

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Mon, 5 Feb 2024 09:37:40 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
wrote:

What about him?

What about Bugliosi?

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)