On Sun, 4 Feb 2024 09:30:37 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
<hsienzant@aol.com> wrote:

Fixed that for you.

Sadly, you can't fix your own words:

You've claimed that the "A.B.C.D." in the Autopsy Report is the
description of the *location* of the large head wound.

Yet you refuse time and time again from QUOTING the preceding
paragraph that describes what this ACTUALLY is. Why is that?

You've also claimed that the prosectors dissected the throat wound.

Why do you continue to refuse to cite any evidence for this?

Why have you CONSISTENTLY run away each time I raise this issue?

Now you've quite stupidly insisted that the bullet entered JFK's back,
and exited the back of his head.

More cowardice, more stupidity, more dishonesty.

Are you proud of yourself?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Mon, 5 Feb 2024 02:02:42 -0800 (PST), Gil Jesus
<gjjmail1202@gmail.com> wrote:

On Sunday, February 4, 2024 at 12:30:39?PM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote:

They help the murderer, Lee Harvey Oswald, to get away with his murder.

Really ?
So you don't believe in the American system of justice where the accused gets to present his side of the story ?
Is that your world, Hank ?
A world where if they say he was guilty, he was guilty ?
Guilty until proven innocent ?
The Soviet system of justice ?

This case against Oswald was only the PROSECUTION'S side of the case.
We never heard from the defense.
But that's OK for people like you, because any defense is nothing more than someone trying "to get away" with his crime.
God, Hank, you're so unreasonable.

And yes, you need to fix yourself.

He will. On Feb. 22.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Mon, 5 Feb 2024 02:02:42 -0800 (PST), Gil Jesus
<gjjmail1202@gmail.com> wrote:

On Sunday, February 4, 2024 at 12:30:39?PM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote:

They help the murderer, Lee Harvey Oswald, to get away with his murder.

Really ?
So you don't believe in the American system of justice where the accused gets to present his side of the story ?
Is that your world, Hank ?
A world where if they say he was guilty, he was guilty ?
Guilty until proven innocent ?
The Soviet system of justice ?

This case against Oswald was only the PROSECUTION'S side of the case.
We never heard from the defense.
But that's OK for people like you, because any defense is nothing more than someone trying "to get away" with his crime.
God, Hank, you're so unreasonable.

And yes, you need to fix yourself.

Huckster cannot publicly admit a *SINGLE* bit of defense evidence.
(even though he's knowledgeable enough to name some...)

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)