My Scenario Part 13

First - a quick review is in order. I've demonstrated that I will do
precisely what I say I will: to wit, I will match in length, detail,
and number of citations any scenario posted by a believer. I've done
so repeatedly, and invariably, believers then run away. I then
demonstrated that the Warren Commission refused to investigate prior assassination attempts that would have shed light on the conspiracy to
murder the President. I then showed that the Warren Commission had
their "conclusions" in written form before they interviewed a single
witness... and that the Commission clearly indicated a desire **NOT**
to hold a real investigation. I then demonstrated that the evidence
from just moments after the shooting strongly supported a shooter at
the Grassy Knoll. I went on to show that the original medical opinion
within hours was for a frontal shot striking JFK. I then demonstrated
that believers deny what the Commission stated about when Connally is
seen reacting to a shot in the film, yet refuse to *explain* that
reaction. I demonstrated that the Warren Commission provably lied
about which shot struck Connally. I then demonstrated that there's
*no* evidence for transit - which is necessary to an SBT. I then
demonstrated that the Edgewood Arsenal tests contradicted the Warren Commission's theory, and they simply ignored those facts. I then
covered evidence tending to show that the Autopsy Report isn't the
original one. I then demonstrated that CE-399 doesn't have any valid
chain of custody. In the last three posts, I showed how one of the
assassins was clearly identified by numerous witnesses as wearing a
white shirt, and was arrested - but wasn't Oswald. In the last two
posts, I've pointed out the evidence for fraudulent alteration of the
medical evidence.

The previous example of evidence alteration is quite credible indeed,
but this following example is one that *NO-ONE* can debate. (But
believers will lie about it anyway!)

The paper found at the TSBD was either found to have the same
observable characteristics as the paper bag alleged to have been found
at the 'sniper's nest'... or it was found to "not be identical" with
the paper bag.

The **SAME** report... not different reports... the SAME IDENTICAL
REPORT offered two contradictory statements. And in a smoking gun
document found by researcher Paul Hoch, the FBI had sent out the
'correction' and ordered that the 'inaccurate statement' be changed
for the new version.

https://www.maryferrell.org/pages/Essay_-_Proof_the_FBI_Changed_Documents_and_Vincent_Bugliosi_Was_Wrong.html
This is SMOKING GUN PROOF that the FBI was willing to intentionally
alter evidential documentation when it suited their needs.
Unfortunately, believers cannot admit the truth, because once they
publicly acknowledge that evidence has been intentionally altered in
this case - they've lost their faith in the WCR.

And if the FBI was willing to DOCUMENT the swapping of an original
signed report at a later date with contradictory report - how many
times did they do so and *NOT* been caught by researchers?

If the paper at the TSBD was **ACTUALLY** found not to have the same
observable characteristics as the paper bag - WHICH CLEARLY WAS THE
ORIGINAL STATEMENT - what effect does this have on the Warren
Commission's theory?

And why did Bugliosi attempt to cover up this "misunderstanding" with
clear lies? (much as he did with the "ragged" wound in JFK's
throat...)

Just as in the previous example, where the medical evidence was
tampered with - what does this say about any "conclusions" based on
this fraudulent evidence?

There's more problems than simply the lies told by the FBI when it
comes to the alleged paper bag. The police clearly needed a way for a
rifle to be brought into the TSBD by Oswald in order to make their
case. But the paper bag in evidence would not hold the rifle ...
UNLESS it had been disassembled. So obviously, the Warren Commission
and all believers believe that Oswald carried the *dissassembled*
rifle in a paper bag.

This was effectly quashed by a simple experiment that the Warren
Commission and all other believers failed to do... replicate.

Ian Griggs did what no-one else was willing to do, he took a
Mannlicher Carcano, disassembled it, and put it in a paper bag. And,
what Ian Griggs discovered when he did this simple experiment - "the
first seven or eight inches of the [wooden] stock show obvious signs
of severe scoring and scratching. This is caused by the protruding
parts of the barrel assembly - principally the trigger - rubbing
against it as the bag is moved or carried."

As Ian Griggs continues to point out, "So what is the significance of
these facts? Quite simply, no such scratches have ever been reported
on the CE 139 rifle. Furthermore, they are not evident in any
photographs taken of that rifle. To me, this provides irrefutable
physical proof that the rifle was never transported in a disassembled
state in a long paper bag as has been claimed by the investigative
agencies and the Warren Commission." - No Case to Answer, Ian Griggs -
page 200

Indeed, the fact that a paper bag was found in the mail, addressed to
Oswald at a non-existent Dallas address, with metered postage (not
stamps), yet short by 12 cents. Then, on Nov 23, a postage due card
for 12 cents arrives at Ruth Paine's house – despite this not being
the non-existent address found on the package to Oswald. This just
absolutely SCREAMS frame-up... and Warren Commission believers have to
just scratch their head... no explanation in sight.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)