On Tuesday, January 23, 2024 at 7:37:31?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Monday, January 22, 2024 at 6:34:18?PM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote:
And don't forget, Brewer saw Oswald punch Officer McDonald AND pull a revolver on that officer.You sure about that Hank ? He saw Oswald pull a revolver ?
Yes. He said he saw it in Oswald’s hand when he first saw it:
Because he testified that he never saw where the gun came from.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/brewer-never-saw-where-gun-came-from.gif
SMH
So what?
The revolver in evidence is traceable to Oswald by business records.
Do you think Officer McDonald just happened to be in possession of
Oswald’s revolver at the time of the encounter in the theatre?
If not, where do you think the weapon came from?
Please offer a reasonable explanation that a commonplace jury of 12 will accept.
Especially when the jury...
Go ahead, we’ll wait.
On Monday, January 22, 2024 at 6:34:18?PM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote:
And don't forget, Brewer saw Oswald punch Officer McDonald AND pull a revolver on that officer.
You sure about that Hank ? He saw Oswald pull a revolver ?
Because he testified that he never saw where the gun came from. >https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/brewer-never-saw-where-gun-came-from.gif
SMH
On Monday, January 22, 2024 at 6:34:18?PM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote:
And don't forget, Brewer saw Oswald punch Officer McDonald AND pull a revolver on that officer.
On Tuesday, January 23, 2024 at 7:37:31?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
You sure about that Hank ? He saw Oswald pull a revolver ?
On Tuesday, January 23, 2024 at 10:58:29?AM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote:
Yes. He said he saw it in Oswald’s hand when he first saw it:
== quote ==
Mr. BREWER - Oswald hit McDonald first, and he knocked him to the seat.
Mr. BELIN - Who knocked who?
Mr. BREWER - He knocked McDonald down. McDonald fell against one of the seats. And then real quick he was back up.
Mr. BELIN - When you say he was----
Mr. BREWER - McDonald was back up. He just knocked him down for a second and he was back up. And I jumped off the stage and was walking toward that, and I saw this gun come up and----in Oswald's hand, a gun up in the air.
Mr. BELIN - Did you see from where the gun came?
Mr. BREWER - No.
Mr. BELIN - You saw the gun up in the air?
Mr. BREWER - And somebody hollered, "He's got a gun."
== unquote ==
On Tuesday, January 23, 2024 at 7:37:31?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
Because he testified that he never saw where the gun came from.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/brewer-never-saw-where-gun-came-from.gif
SMH
On Tuesday, January 23, 2024 at 10:58:29?AM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote:
So what?
So you lied. You said, "Brewer saw Oswald punch Officer McDonald AND pull a revolver on that officer."
Brewer said he saw the gun in Oswald's hand and the gun was pointed in the air. When you pull a gun on someone, you aim it AT them.
Oswald never pulled a gun on MacDonald.
And Brewer never said he saw Oswald PULL the gun from his waistband.
Mr. BELIN - Did you see from where the gun came?
Mr. BREWER - No.
So you're intepretation of what happened is bullshit, as usual.
On Tuesday, January 23, 2024 at 11:14:51?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 07:58:28 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
<hsie...@aol.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, January 23, 2024 at 7:37:31?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:In other words, you lied.
On Monday, January 22, 2024 at 6:34:18?PM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote: >>>>> And don't forget, Brewer saw Oswald punch Officer McDonald AND pull a revolver on that officer.
You sure about that Hank ? He saw Oswald pull a revolver ?
Yes. He said he saw it in Oswald’s hand when he first saw it:
No, I reached the reasonable conclusion.
You can go ahead and admit it, Huckster...
Gil just proved you a iiar, that's what.Because he testified that he never saw where the gun came from.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/brewer-never-saw-where-gun-came-from.gif
SMH
So what?
No...
Not that we needed any further proof.
Amusingly, YOU CAN'T EVEN ADMIT that you got caught lying.
Because I didn't.
The revolver in evidence is traceable to Oswald by business records.An assumption on your part, with nothing to cite... And has *NOTHING*
to do with your lie.
The revolver taken from Oswald’s hand...
Do you think Officer McDonald just happened to be in possession ofCan you name this logical fallacy?
Oswald’s revolver at the time of the encounter in the theatre?
If not, where do you think the weapon came from?No need to answer logical fallacies, you merely point'em out, and move
on.
Please offer a reasonable explanation that a commonplace jury of 12 will accept.Already have - and most of America accepts a conspiracy in this case.
No, you didn't...
Especially when the jury...
The jury has already been polled.
No...
You lose!Ben couldn't wait to change the subject.
Go ahead, we’ll wait.Said the coward who can't answer this:
On Tuesday, January 23, 2024 at 11:14:51?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 15:34:16 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
<hsie...@aol.com> wrote:
On Friday, January 19, 2024 at 10:15:58?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:Molesting your own mother again, aren't you? You'll be COMPLETELY
Does anyone sense any pattern of evidence here? Is there any believer
willing to say the words "white shirt?" Is there a *SINGLE* honest
believer who will publicly admit what the evidence here shows? Can
*any* believer admit that Oswald doesn't fit this description?
Johnny Brewer peeked through the curtains and pointed to a man wearing >>>> a long-sleeved brown shirt and told Westbrook, "The man in the 4th row >>>> from the back in the middle aisle is the man." But the suspect sitting >>>> at the rear of the semi-darkened theater did not fit the description
of the man who shot Tippit.
Hilarious! Brewer was *NOT* a witness to the Tippit [hs] shooting, and he was *NOT* identifying the man he thought shot Tippit.
unable to point to anything I said that supports what you just
claimed.
You were talking about how Brewer’s man didn't match the man in the Tippit shooting:
And don't forget, Brewer saw Oswald punch Officer McDonald AND pull a revolver on that officer.
See if you can follow my logic. Let me know where I lose you:
On Wednesday, January 24, 2024 at 8:56:03?PM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote:463 ) That would have caused an enormous amount of pain for McDonald.
We'll await your reconstruction of the event and how Brewer saw a gun in Oswald's hand that Oswald didn't pull from his waist.
Go ahead...
You're the "more knowledgeable" one and I have to keep explaining things to you ?
George Applin told reporter Earl Golz that he thought the gun came from the officer's holster.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/golz-applin.png
Ever hear of the term "drop gun" ? Probably not.
A “drop gun” was a weapon that was usually planted on someone by police, or at the scene of a crime in order to implicate that person of a crime.
The gun itself would be one that could not be traced back to the cop who planted it.
McDonald testified:
“It was just natural that my hand went to his waist for a weapon, which was my intent anyway, whether he raised his hands or not.” ( 3 H 303 )
Natural ? No, that’s not the way it’s done.
You don't shake down a suspect beginning at his waist. You always start at the shoulders and work down.
Combine this with what George Applin told Earl Golz that he believed the revolver came from McDonald, and the evidence seems to support a planting of the revolver.
Is this why Oswald threw a punch at McDonald, because he stuffed a revolver in his waistband ?
McDonald testified that Oswald drew the weapon as he put his hand on Oswald’s waist. ( 3 H 300 )
But Officer C.T. Walker testified that Oswald did not immediately pull the revolver when he knocked McDonald back against the seats.
“..it stayed there for a second or two. He didn’t get it out. ” ( Testimony of C.T. Walker, 7 H 39 )
Why not ? Why did he not display an intent to use it ?
And why did McDonald lie ?
Why did McDonald also lie about getting the webbing of his hand between the firing pin and the cartridge's primer ? The FBI found that the hammer would have had to have been cocked all the way back in order for the firing pin to hit the primer. ( 3 H
Why did no one report his screams of agony ? Why is there no record of his receiving medical attention for his injury ?
McDonald also lied about the gun misfiring. The FBI found that the mark on one of the unfired rounds was not made by the weapon's firing pin. ( 3 H 460 )
Which means it was planted.
That's your star witness, Hank. The liar McDonald who lied about being injured, who lied about the gun misfiring and who was probably the one who planted the fake mark on the cartridge
to try to support his story.
And if they planted the mark on the cartridge, how do you know they didn't plant the weapon ?
Who would have handed McDonald a weapon to plant on Oswald ?
That's easy. Capt. W.R Westbrook.
McDonald and Capt. Westbrook knew each other. In fact, Westbrook was previously McDonald’s commanding officer in another division. ( 7 H 112 )
So they were well acquainted with each other. And Westbrook was CIA.
McDonald's whole version of events is debunked by the evidence and testimony. >Anyone who believes him believes in unicorns and sugar-plum-fairies.
On Thursday, January 25, 2024 at 7:45:54?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Wednesday, January 24, 2024 at 8:56:03?PM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote:
You're the "more knowledgeable" one and I have to keep explaining things to you ?
We'll await your reconstruction of the event and how Brewer saw a gun in Oswald's hand that Oswald didn't pull from his waist.
Go ahead...
George Applin told reporter Earl Golz that he thought the gun came from the officer's holster.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/golz-applin.png
Ever hear of the term "drop gun" ? Probably not.
A “drop gun” was a weapon that was usually planted on someone by police, or at the scene of a crime in order to implicate that person of a crime.
The gun itself would be one that could not be traced back to the cop who planted it.
463 ) That would have caused an enormous amount of pain for McDonald.McDonald testified:
“It was just natural that my hand went to his waist for a weapon, which was my intent anyway, whether he raised his hands or not.” ( 3 H 303 )
Natural ? No, that’s not the way it’s done.
You don't shake down a suspect beginning at his waist. You always start at the shoulders and work down.
Combine this with what George Applin told Earl Golz that he believed the revolver came from McDonald, and the evidence seems to support a planting of the revolver.
Is this why Oswald threw a punch at McDonald, because he stuffed a revolver in his waistband ?
McDonald testified that Oswald drew the weapon as he put his hand on Oswald’s waist. ( 3 H 300 )
But Officer C.T. Walker testified that Oswald did not immediately pull the revolver when he knocked McDonald back against the seats.
“..it stayed there for a second or two. He didn’t get it out. ” ( Testimony of C.T. Walker, 7 H 39 )
Why not ? Why did he not display an intent to use it ?
And why did McDonald lie ?
Why did McDonald also lie about getting the webbing of his hand between the firing pin and the cartridge's primer ? The FBI found that the hammer would have had to have been cocked all the way back in order for the firing pin to hit the primer. ( 3 H
Why did no one report his screams of agony ? Why is there no record of his receiving medical attention for his injury ?
McDonald also lied about the gun misfiring. The FBI found that the mark on one of the unfired rounds was not made by the weapon's firing pin. ( 3 H 460 )
Which means it was planted.
That's your star witness, Hank. The liar McDonald who lied about being injured, who lied about the gun misfiring and who was probably the one who planted the fake mark on the cartridge
to try to support his story.
And if they planted the mark on the cartridge, how do you know they didn't plant the weapon ?
Who would have handed McDonald a weapon to plant on Oswald ?
That's easy. Capt. W.R Westbrook.
McDonald and Capt. Westbrook knew each other. In fact, Westbrook was previously McDonald’s commanding officer in another division. ( 7 H 112 )
So they were well acquainted with each other. And Westbrook was CIA.
McDonald's whole version of events is debunked by the evidence and testimony.
Anyone who believes him believes in unicorns and sugar-plum-fairies.
On Thursday, January 25, 2024 at 10:21:54?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 17:56:02 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
<hsie...@aol.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, January 23, 2024 at 12:36:56?PM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:...
On Monday, January 22, 2024 at 6:34:18?PM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote: >>>>>>> And don't forget, Brewer saw Oswald punch Officer McDonald AND pull a revolver on that officer.
Well, let's look at the testimony of another witness...
Did another witness say that Brewer saw Oswald pull a revolver?
If you were honest, you'd be forced to say "No."
The old legal trope...
But you aren't honest - and judging by the following, you're also a
coward:
You've claimed that the "A.B.C.D." in the Autopsy Report is the
description of the *location* of the large head wound.
Yet you refuse time and time again from QUOTING the preceding
paragraph that describes what this ACTUALLY is. Why is that?
You've also claimed that the prosectors dissected the throat wound.
Why do you continue to refuse to cite any evidence for this?
Why have you CONSISTENTLY run away each time I raise this issue?
Now you've quite stupidly insisted that the bullet entered JFK's back,
and exited the back of his head.
More cowardice, more stupidity, more dishonesty.
Are you proud of yourself?
On Thursday, January 25, 2024 at 7:45:54?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Wednesday, January 24, 2024 at 8:56:03?PM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote:
You're the "more knowledgeable" one and I have to keep explaining things to you ?
We'll await your reconstruction of the event and how Brewer saw a gun in Oswald's hand that Oswald didn't pull from his waist.
Go ahead...
George Applin told reporter Earl Golz that he thought the gun came from the officer's holster.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/golz-applin.png
463 ) That would have caused an enormous amount of pain for McDonald.Ever hear of the term "drop gun" ? Probably not.
A “drop gun” was a weapon that was usually planted on someone by police, or at the scene of a crime in order to implicate that person of a crime.
The gun itself would be one that could not be traced back to the cop who planted it.
McDonald testified:
“It was just natural that my hand went to his waist for a weapon, which was my intent anyway, whether he raised his hands or not.” ( 3 H 303 )
Natural ? No, that’s not the way it’s done.
You don't shake down a suspect beginning at his waist. You always start at the shoulders and work down.
Combine this with what George Applin told Earl Golz that he believed the revolver came from McDonald, and the evidence seems to support a planting of the revolver.
McDonald testified that Oswald drew the weapon as he put his hand on Oswald’s waist. ( 3 H 300 )
But Officer C.T. Walker testified that Oswald did not immediately pull the revolver when he knocked McDonald back against the seats.
“..it stayed there for a second or two. He didn’t get it out. ” ( Testimony of C.T. Walker, 7 H 39 )
Why not ? Why did he not display an intent to use it ?
And why did McDonald lie ?
Why did McDonald also lie about getting the webbing of his hand between the firing pin and the cartridge's primer ? The FBI found that the hammer would have had to have been cocked all the way back in order for the firing pin to hit the primer. ( 3 H
Why did no one report his screams of agony ? Why is there no record of his receiving medical attention for his injury ?
McDonald also lied about the gun misfiring. The FBI found that the mark on one of the unfired rounds was not made by the weapon's firing pin. ( 3 H 460 )
That's your star witness, Hank. The liar McDonald who lied about being injured,
who lied about the gun misfiring and who was probably the one who planted the fake mark on the cartridge
to try to support his story.
And if they planted the mark on the cartridge, how do you know they didn't plant the weapon ?
Who would have handed McDonald a weapon to plant on Oswald ?
That's easy. Capt. W.R Westbrook.
McDonald and Capt. Westbrook knew each other. In fact, Westbrook was previously McDonald’s commanding officer in another division. ( 7 H 112 )
So they were well acquainted with each other. And Westbrook was CIA.
McDonald's whole version of events is debunked by the evidence and testimony.
Anyone who believes him believes in unicorns and sugar-plum-fairies.
On Thursday, January 25, 2024 at 11:41:18?AM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote:
Brewer’s testimony: “McDonald was back up. He just knocked him down for a second and he was back up. And I jumped off the stage and was walking toward that, and I saw this gun come up and----in Oswald's hand, a gun up in the air.”
Brewer never said he saw Oswald pull the gun from his waistband or anywhere else. He testified that saw the gun in Oswald's hand.
YOU said he saw Oswald pull the gun and that's a lie. His testimony proves it.
He testified that he never saw where the gun came from. >https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/brewer-never-saw-where-gun-came-from.gif
I don't know how much clearer that can be for you.
On Thursday, January 25, 2024 at 11:10:00?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 07:50:57 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
<hsie...@aol.com> wrote:
On Thursday, January 25, 2024 at 7:45:54?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:1. What is the testimony or hearsay or ANYTHING that led you to claim
On Wednesday, January 24, 2024 at 8:56:03?PM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote: >>>>>
We'll await your reconstruction of the event and how Brewer saw a gun in Oswald's hand that Oswald didn't pull from his waist.You're the "more knowledgeable" one and I have to keep explaining things to you ?
Go ahead...
George Applin told reporter Earl Golz that he thought the gun came from the officer's holster.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/golz-applin.png
that Brewer saw Oswald pull a revolver?
Brewer’s testimony: “McDonald was back up. He just knocked him down for a second and he was back up. And I jumped off the stage and was walking toward that, and I saw this gun come up and----in Oswald's hand, a gun up in the air.”
2. What is the testimony or hearsay or ANYTHING that led you to claim
that Brewer saw Oswald pull a revolver?
Same answer.
3. What is the testimony or hearsay or ANYTHING that led you to claim
that Brewer saw Oswald pull a revolver?
Ditto.
4. What is the testimony or hearsay or ANYTHING that led you to claim
that Brewer saw Oswald pull a revolver?
Likewise.
5. What is the testimony or hearsay or ANYTHING that led you to claim
that Brewer saw Oswald pull a revolver?
As above.
6. What is the testimony or hearsay or ANYTHING that led you to claim
that Brewer saw Oswald pull a revolver?
What Brewer testified to.
7. What is the testimony or hearsay or ANYTHING that led you to claim
that Brewer saw Oswald pull a revolver?
Duh.
8. What is the testimony or hearsay or ANYTHING that led you to claim
that Brewer saw Oswald pull a revolver?
Too evident to everyone but a WC critic.
Your lie makes no sense on so many levels.
What lie?
Brewer testified to Oswald seeing the weapon in Oswald’s hand.
If he didn’t pull it after punching McDonald, where did it come from?'
McDonald...
On Thursday, January 25, 2024 at 12:27:27?PM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Thursday, January 25, 2024 at 11:41:18?AM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote:
Brewer’s testimony: “McDonald was back up. He just knocked him down for a second and he was back up. And I jumped off the stage and was walking toward that, and I saw this gun come up and----in Oswald's hand, a gun up in the air.”Brewer never said he saw Oswald pull the gun from his waistband or anywhere else. He testified that saw the gun in Oswald's hand.
YOU said he saw Oswald pull the gun and that's a lie. His testimony proves it.
He testified that he never saw where the gun came from.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/brewer-never-saw-where-gun-came-from.gif
I don't know how much clearer that can be for you.
Define “pull the gun”.
On Thursday, January 25, 2024 at 1:24:53?PM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote:
Define “pull the gun”.
No, YOU define it, YOU said it.
On Monday, January 22, 2024 at 6:34:18?PM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote:
"And don't forget, BREWER SAW OSWALD punch Officer McDonald and PULL A REVOLVER ON THAT OFFICER."'
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/vi8nx6srKsQ/m/DD7_PGQsAQAJ
That's a lie. Brewer never testified that he saw Oswald pull a weapon.
In fact, he testified that he never saw WHERE the gun came from. >https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/brewer-never-saw-where-gun-came-from.gif
I don't know why I have to keep repeating it.
I apply reasoning to the testimony. You apply game-playing to find reasons to get Oswald off.
I post links to official documents and testimony, i.e., evidence.
When I don't post the link, I cite the volume and page.
I don't "play games."
You're the one "game-playing" by posting your "reasoning" and interpretations. >I hate to be the one to tell you this, but your "reasoning" and interpretations are not evidence.
That's why you're always wrong.
And like all Lone Nutters, when your reasoning, speculations and interpretations come up against official document and testimony, YOU LOSE.
Not only do you lose, but you look foolish in the process, leaving yourselves open to being called liars.
The evidence is clear, while Brewer testified he saw the gun in Oswald's hand after he hit McDonald, he never saw Oswald "pull a revolver on that officer".
At the very least, you're mistaken. At the very most you're a liar.
On Friday, January 26, 2024 at 5:19:14?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Thursday, January 25, 2024 at 1:24:53?PM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote:
Define “pull the gun”.No, YOU define it, YOU said it.
On Monday, January 22, 2024 at 6:34:18?PM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote:
"And don't forget, BREWER SAW OSWALD punch Officer McDonald and PULL A REVOLVER ON THAT OFFICER."'
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/vi8nx6srKsQ/m/DD7_PGQsAQAJ >>
That's a lie. Brewer never testified that he saw Oswald pull a weapon.
Define what you mean by “pull a weapon”. Then we can discuss further.
On Monday, January 29, 2024 at 10:34:36?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Sat, 27 Jan 2024 13:23:10 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
<hsie...@aol.com> wrote:
On Friday, January 26, 2024 at 5:19:14?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Thursday, January 25, 2024 at 1:24:53?PM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote: >>>>> Define “pull the gun”.
No, YOU define it, YOU said it.
On Monday, January 22, 2024 at 6:34:18?PM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote:
"And don't forget, BREWER SAW OSWALD punch Officer McDonald and PULL A REVOLVER ON THAT OFFICER."'
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/vi8nx6srKsQ/m/DD7_PGQsAQAJ
That's a lie. Brewer never testified that he saw Oswald pull a weapon.
Define what you mean by “pull a weapon”. Then we can discuss further.
No, that will never happen.
Because you don’t want to move the conversation forward?
On Friday, February 2, 2024 at 10:28:53?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 03:41:55 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
<hsie...@aol.com> wrote:
On Monday, January 29, 2024 at 10:34:36?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Sat, 27 Jan 2024 13:23:10 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
<hsie...@aol.com> wrote:
On Friday, January 26, 2024 at 5:19:14?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Thursday, January 25, 2024 at 1:24:53?PM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote: >>>>>>> Define “pull the gun”.Define what you mean by “pull a weapon”. Then we can discuss further.
No, YOU define it, YOU said it.
On Monday, January 22, 2024 at 6:34:18?PM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote: >>>>>> "And don't forget, BREWER SAW OSWALD punch Officer McDonald and PULL A REVOLVER ON THAT OFFICER."'
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/vi8nx6srKsQ/m/DD7_PGQsAQAJ
That's a lie. Brewer never testified that he saw Oswald pull a weapon. >>>>>
No, that will never happen.
Because you don’t want to move the conversation forward?
No jackass!! Because **YOU** provably run away.
Right now, you’re the one provably running...
On Friday, February 2, 2024 at 10:28:53?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 03:41:55 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
<hsie...@aol.com> wrote:
On Monday, January 29, 2024 at 10:34:36?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Sat, 27 Jan 2024 13:23:10 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
<hsie...@aol.com> wrote:
On Friday, January 26, 2024 at 5:19:14?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Thursday, January 25, 2024 at 1:24:53?PM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote: >>>>>>> Define “pull the gun”.Define what you mean by “pull a weapon”. Then we can discuss further.
No, YOU define it, YOU said it.
On Monday, January 22, 2024 at 6:34:18?PM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote: >>>>>> "And don't forget, BREWER SAW OSWALD punch Officer McDonald and PULL A REVOLVER ON THAT OFFICER."'
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/vi8nx6srKsQ/m/DD7_PGQsAQAJ
That's a lie. Brewer never testified that he saw Oswald pull a weapon. >>>>>
No, that will never happen.
Because you don’t want to move the conversation forward?
No jackass!! Because **YOU** provably run away.
Right now, you’re the one provably running...
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 123:40:19 |
| Calls: | 6,662 |
| Files: | 12,212 |
| Messages: | 5,334,705 |
