On Mon, 4 Feb 2013 11:29:15 -0800 (PST), Walt
<papakochenbrot@evertek.net> wrote:

There were freshly painted yellow markers on the curb of Elm street
which matked the "kill Zone"at the time President Kennedy was
murdered. Those bright yellow markers can be seen in the Z film and
other photos of Dealey Plaza. I believe they were evidence that the
murder was preplanned and a military style operation.

Ben Holmes wrote: "Actually, the yellow painted curbs *is* rather >interesting. They were freshly painted, I understand, and would
provide a common marker for all assassins. Since all were in places
where the view was different, a common marker that could be seen by
all would be handy.

Such paint seems to serve no purpose unless you postulate that those
were sections of curbs slated for replacement or something along those
lines.

We may be straining gnats and swallowing camels here, but the painted
curbs do make for an interesting mystery.

Although the painted curbs have an obvious and credible explanation
for critics - believers have no explanation...

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 20:21:30 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
<hsienzant@aol.com> wrote:

You've claimed that the "A.B.C.D." in the Autopsy Report is the
description of the *location* of the large head wound.

Yet you refuse time and time again from QUOTING the preceding
paragraph that describes what this ACTUALLY is. Why is that?

You've also claimed that the prosectors dissected the throat wound.

Why do you continue to refuse to cite any evidence for this?

Why have you CONSISTENTLY run away each time I raise this issue?

Now you've quite stupidly insisted that the bullet entered JFK's back,
and exited the back of his head.

More cowardice, more stupidity, more dishonesty.

Are you proud of yourself?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 04:15:01 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
wrote:

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 02:26:40 -0800 (PST), Gil Jesus
<gjjmail1202@gmail.com> wrote:

As usual, your reading comprehension is less than admirable. Ben posted a post originally posted by Walt Cakebread and his response to it. It was Cakebread who speculated that the painted curbs were marking for the assassins, Ben just noted that it was

an interesting thought worth discussion.

Although the painted curbs may not have been painted SPECIFICALLY to mark where the assassination was to take place, there's no reason why they couldn't have been used as landmarks.
Yellow painted curbs usually indicate no parking zones.

As far as your silly question goes, it was originally publicly stated that the President had been killed, "as part of an International Communist Conspiracy", not a lone gunman.
It wasn't until LBJ's people and then LBJ himself, called Dallas to tell them to stop saying that and to end the investigation, that the narrative changed to a lone gunman.

You fail to understand that whoever controls the evidence can present any case they want to, real or not.
And you also fail to understand that Dallas DA Henry Wade had no problem presenting such fake cases, fake cases that were given to him by police.
The proof of that is that Wade presented 19 fake cases that were overturned on DNA evidence.
https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna25917791

Huckster's simply a coward who can't deal with the evidence. Feb 22
can't come soon enough.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 05:04:32 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
<hsienzant@aol.com> wrote:

You've claimed that the "A.B.C.D." in the Autopsy Report is the
description of the *location* of the large head wound.

Yet you refuse time and time again from QUOTING the preceding
paragraph that describes what this ACTUALLY is. Why is that?

You've also claimed that the prosectors dissected the throat wound.

Why do you continue to refuse to cite any evidence for this?

Why have you CONSISTENTLY run away each time I raise this issue?

Now you've quite stupidly insisted that the bullet entered JFK's back,
and exited the back of his head.

More cowardice, more stupidity, more dishonesty.

Are you proud of yourself?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)