• Chickenshit Lies About The Evidence...

    From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jan 15 09:08:24 2024
    Walt: "Two eyewitnesses swore under oath that the bag that they saw in
    Lee Oswald's possession that eainy morning was no longer than 28
    inches. That was the MAXIMUM length they would allow for their
    estimate.

    Chickenshit: "You claim this is a fact, but it is just a lie. You
    won`t be able to show where either of these witnesses said the bag
    they saw could not have been longer than their estimates."

    Mrs. Randle: "Well, it wasn't that long, I mean it was folded down at
    the top as I told you. It definitely wasn't that long."


    This is a slam dunk... Chickenshit got caught lying about the
    evidence... Walt indeed was absolutely correct.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jan 15 14:15:53 2024
    On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 13:49:44 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
    wrote:

    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)