First - a quick review is in order. I've demonstrated that I will do
precisely what I say I will: to wit, I will match in length, detail,
and number of citations any scenario posted by a believer. I've done
so repeatedly, and invariably, believers then run away. I then
demonstrated that the Warren Commission refused to investigate prior assassination attempts that would have shed light on the conspiracy to
murder the President. I then showed that the Warren Commission had
their "conclusions" in written form before they interviewed a single
witness... and that the Commission clearly indicated a desire **NOT**
to hold a real investigation. I then demonstrated that the evidence
from just moments after the shooting strongly supported a shooter at
the Grassy Knoll. I went on to show that the original medical opinion
within hours was for a frontal shot striking JFK. I then demonstrated
that believers deny what the Commission stated about when Connally is
seen reacting to a shot in the film, yet refuse to *explain* that
reaction. I demonstrated that the Warren Commission provably lied
about which shot struck Connally. I then demonstrated that there's
*no* evidence for transit - which is necessary to an SBT. I then
demonstrated that the Edgewood Arsenal tests contradicted the Warren Commission's theory, and they simply ignored those facts.

Or, in Chickenshit's case, simply can't understand it.

The Autopsy Report is an absolute necessity for believers - as it's
scientific evidence that contradicts the earliest EXPERT opinion that
JFK was shot from the front. But we have a number of problems with the
Autopsy Report.

The major one being that it apparently didn't originally say what it
*NOW* says...

In the formerly classified Executive session on Jan 27th: ***************************************
Mr. Rankin. Then there is a great range of material in regard to the
wounds, and the autopsy and this point of exit or entrance of the
bullet in the front of the neck, and that all has to be developed much
more than we have at the present time.

We have an explanation there in the autopsy that probably a fragment
came out the front of the neck, but with the elevation other shot must
have come from, and the angle, it seems quite apparent now, since we
have the picture of where the bullet entered in the back, that the
bullet entered below the shoulder blade to the right of the backbone,
which is below the place where the picture shows the bullet came out
in the neckband of the shirt in front, and the bullet, according to
the autopsy didn't strike any bone at all, that particular bullet, and
go through.
*****************************************

"Below the shoulder blades?"
"probably a fragment came out the front of the neck?"

Can you point to any statement in the current existing Autopsy report
that would support these statements?

Was Rankin simply mistaken? Under what conditions could he come up
with such a mistaken impression of what the Autopsy Report said?

Reasonable people will know that Rankin was entirely literate, and had
no problems at all in reading what he had in front of him. Reasonable
people will know that this is credible evidence that the Autopsy
Report doesn't exist today in the form that Rankin had on Jan 27,
1964.

Even in unclassified testimony - we see the evidence for the Autopsy
Report being changed...

Mr. DULLES - Could I ask a question about the missile, I am a little
bit--the bullet, I am a little bit--confused. It was found on the
stretcher. Did the President's body remain on the stretcher while it
was in the hospital?
Commander HUMES - Of that point I have no knowledge. The only--
Mr. DULLES - Why would it--would this operating have anything to do
with the bullet being on the stretcher unless the President's body
remained on the stretcher after he was taken into the hospital; is
that possible?
Commander HUMES - It is quite possible, sir.
Mr. DULLES - Otherwise it seems to me the bullet would have to have
been ejected from the body before he was taken or put on the bed in
the hospital.
Commander HUMES - Right, sir. I, of course, was not there. I don't
know how he was handled in the hospital, in what conveyance. I do know
he was on his back during the period of his stay in the hospital:
Doctor Perry told me that.
Mr. DULLES - Yes; and wasn't turned over.
Commander HUMES - That is right.
Mr. DULLES - So he might have been on the stretcher the whole time. is
that your view?
The CHAIRMAN. He said he had no view. He wasn't there, he doesn't know
anything about it.
Mr. DULLES - Yes. I wonder if there is other evidence of this.
Mr. SPECTER - There has been other evidence, Mr. DULLES - If I may say
at this point, we shall produce later, subject to sequential proof,
evidence that the stretcher on which this bullet was found was the
stretcher of Governor Connally. We have a sequence of events on the transmission of that stretcher which ties that down reasonably
closely, so that on the night of the autopsy itself, as the
information I have been developing indicates, the thought
preliminarily was that was from President Kennedy's stretcher, and
that is what led to the hypothesis which we have been exploring about
but which has since been rejected. But at any rate the evidence will
show that it was from Governor Connally's stretcher that the bullet
was found.
Mr. DULLES - So this bullet is still missing?
Mr. SPECTER - That is the subject of some theories I am about to get
into. That is an elusive subject, but Dr. Humes has some views on it
and we might just as well go into those now.

Notice that even four months AFTER an autopsy report that supposedly
asserted that the bullet striking JFK's back went out through his
throat - Dulles is still under the impression that the bullet striking
JFK in the back had worked itself back out, and ended up in JFK's
stretcher.

Those knowledgeable on the case evidence will recognize this theory as
an early one existing during the autopsy. Indeed, this is what the FBI
report by Sibert & O'Neill stated! http://22november1963.org.uk/sibert-and-oneill-report#sibert-oneill-report While this is far from positive proof - it's something that believers
cannot explain in non-conspiratorial terms. Dulles was one of the most
active members of the Commission, and could not possibly have missed
the autopsy results had they existed in the form they do today.

Note how honest Spector is... he states that the subject of a "missing
bullet" is an "elusive subject" - and indeed, to this very day, no-one
can elucidate what was being referred to.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)