First - a quick review is in order. I've demonstrated that I will do
precisely what I say I will: to wit, I will match in length, detail,
and number of citations any scenario posted by a believer. I've done
so repeatedly, and invariably, believers then run away. I then
demonstrated that the Warren Commission refused to investigate prior assassination attempts that would have shed light on the conspiracy to
murder the President. I then showed that the Warren Commission had
their "conclusions" in written form before they interviewed a single
witness... and that the Commission clearly indicated a desire **NOT**
to hold a real investigation. I then demonstrated that the evidence
from just moments after the shooting strongly supported a shooter at
the Grassy Knoll. I went on to show that the original medical opinion
within hours was for a frontal shot striking JFK.

Amusingly, not one single believer addressed that post thus far.

At this point, I've already explained a scenario that demolishes the
Warren Commission's case - this evidence shows that the Warren
Commission twisted the evidence to fit their "facts" - and not the
facts to suit the evidence.

Even though believers cannot publicly acknowledge these facts - they
cannot refute them either. Believer's lose.

The shooting sequence has been frequently lied about by believers...
the Warren Commission recognized that the extant Zapruder film showed
that Connally must have had a "delayed" reaction... yet believers
today frequently claim that they can see what the Warren Commission
denied existed... a simultaneous reaction.

The earliest point that a shot could be fired was frame 210. This was
because the FBI demonstrated that for a considerable time before 210,
JFK was hidden from the 6th floor window by a large oak tree.

The FBI determined that the Mannlicher Carcano *COULD NOT* be fired
faster than once every 2.3 seconds... the equivalent of 42 frames of
the extant Zapruder film. So as JFK is shown reacting to a strike at
210, any shots fired sooner than frame 252 constitute ABSOLUTE PROOF
of another assassin.

But Connally is seen on the film reacting to a hit IMMEDIATELY PRIOR
TO FRAME 238. At that point Governor Connally had been turning to his
right, when suddenly - in the 1/18 second which had elapsed since
preceding frame 237 - he is halted in mid-turn, his right shoulder is
thrust forward (toward the Zapruder camera) and down, and immediately thereafter his mouth pops open. Gov. Connally, in his testimony,
stated: "I immediately, when I was hit, I said, 'Oh, no, no, no'.

The sudden forward thrust of his shoulder, in a direction opposite
from that in which he was turning, is conclusive proof that this was
not a delayed reaction to pain, but the very moment of impact.

Therefore, either the shot that hit Governor Connally AT FRAME 237 is
the same one that struck JFK at frame 210, or there was a second
assassin. The so-called "SBT" is an ABSOLUTE NECESSITY to evade the
fact that there were multiple assassins.

The Zapruder film quite clearly shows a reaction by Connally that is
almost 2 seconds later than JFK's. By claiming a simultaneous reaction
- believers simply ignore the provable reaction that come immediately
following frame 237 of the Z-film. Connally himself agreed with the
Warren Commission that his reaction was in the mid 230's... and he was certainly a witness that you cannot ignore.

BELIEVERS IGNORE AND FAIL TO EXPLAIN THE OBVIOUS REACTION SEEN BY
CONNALLY IN THE FILM.

Believers simply pretend that the bullet could come out of his chest,
strike the OUTSIDE of his wrist, exit the inside of his wrist, then
take a sharp turn and end up in Connally's left thigh... but anyone
who does any serious thinking about this *AND* reads the testimony
will understand that even the doctors didn't believe it.

As Dr. Shaw testified: "I have always felt that the wounds of Governor
Connally could be explained by the passage of one missile through his
chest, striking his wrist and a fragment of it going on into his left
thigh." (6H91)

Believers will quickly gloss over that statement, and not realize that
it's an indictment of their beloved SBT.

Indeed, pay attention to the responses this post gets, and note that
believers simply missed what I just quoted Dr. Shaw stating - and how
it *CONTRADICTS* what the Warren Commission believed.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)