1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. ALT.CONSPIRACY.JFK

  • The Logical Thinking Of David Von Penis...

    From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jan 8 08:43:36 2024
    Found in another forum:

    "The only possible way for Lee Harvey Oswald to be innocent of
    shooting J.D. Tippit is if the following idiotic situation occurred
    (which nobody could possibly even begin to believe happened on
    November 22, 1963):

    Somebody other than Lee Oswald shoots Tippit with Oswald's revolver.
    This "non-Oswald" shooter (who looks just exactly like Lee Harvey
    Oswald, but really isn't him) then flees the scene of the Tippit
    crime, dumping four shells on the ground as he runs away. This
    non-Oswald shooter then meets up with the real Lee Oswald and hands
    off the Tippit murder weapon to LHO. Oswald then proceeds to the Texas Theater where he is arrested while in possession of the gun that
    somebody else used to kill Officer Tippit just 35 minutes earlier."

    The reason no-one would even begin to believe such a wacky theory is
    that it's intentionally a wacky theory.

    It's far easier to believe that the problems with chain of custody are
    real, and caused by intentionally framing a suspect.

    But Von Penis can't go there. That would be far too credible and
    would explain evidence he can't explain.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to gjjmail1202@gmail.com on Mon Jan 8 10:48:39 2024
    On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 10:02:19 -0800 (PST), Gil Jesus
    <gjjmail1202@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Monday, January 8, 2024 at 11:43:41?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:

    The reason no-one would even begin to believe such a wacky theory is that it's intentionally a wacky theory.

    It's far easier to believe that the problems with chain of custody are real, and caused by intentionally framing a suspect.

    But Von Penis can't go there. That would be far too credible and would explain evidence he can't explain.

    If Oswald were guilty of the crimes he was accused of, all the evidence would add up.
    It doesn't. End of story.


    Indeed! I challenge believers to post ANY EVIDENCE AT ALL that they
    think supports them... that is undisputed by other evidence.

    Almost everything in this case is disputed... credibly... by other
    evidence... yet believers simply refuse to acknowledge this fact.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jan 8 12:47:39 2024
    On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 11:37:31 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
    wrote:

    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jan 8 12:48:09 2024
    On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 11:39:14 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
    wrote:

    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)