The Truth That WCR Believers Run From... #6
From
Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to
All on Mon Jan 8 07:32:26 2024
First - a quick review is in order. I've demonstrated that I will do
precisely what I say I will: to wit, I will match in length, detail,
and number of citations any scenario posted by a believer. Just as I
did with Huckster - who lied about this... I've done
so repeatedly, and invariably, believers then run away. I then
demonstrated that the Warren Commission refused to investigate prior assassination attempts that would have shed light on the conspiracy to
murder the President. I then showed that the Warren Commission had
their "conclusions" in written form before they interviewed a single
witness... and that the Commission clearly indicated a desire **NOT**
to hold a real investigation. I then demonstrated that the evidence
from just moments after the shooting strongly supported a shooter at
the Grassy Knoll.
And not a SINGLE believer responded to that post.
Moving on... the strongest evidence outside of the eyewitnesses who
pointed to the Grassy Knoll - was the medical evidence given within
those first few hours... where it was stated that JFK had been hit
from the front in the throat and temple.
The Warren Commission knew this - they made a distinct effort *NOT* to
have the Parkland Conference on the record. Vincent Bugliosi, too,
knew just how powerful this evidence was - he was forced to lie about
it... stating that "Although Carrico was unable to determine whether
the throat wound was an entrance or exit wound, he did observe that
the wound was "ragged," virtually a sure sign of an exit wound as
opposed to an entrance wound, which is usually round and devoid of
ragged edges." (Bugliosi, p.413)
This is simply a lie... and not a *SINGLE* believer has been willing
to publicly acknowledge this fact.
But Bugliosi clearly understood that the *ACTUAL* description of the
wound as small, round, neat... and looking like an entry wound... was devastating to the official theory.
So he simply lied.
The truth, of course, is that this throat wound of Kennedy's *LOOKED*
like an entry wound - medical professionals with a great deal of
expertise with bullet wounds stated this. The Warren Commission evaded
this fact, and managed to convince the eyewitnesses to recant their
*ORIGINAL* statements - but when original statements conflict with
later statements - and presuming that there's no new information - the
earliest statements are by far the most credible.
Since the Autopsy never saw the throat wound, and never even knew it
existed - the autopsy isn't evidence that can contradict the earliest
medical evidence for an ENTRY wound in the throat.
Yet time after time, believers cite the Autopsy Report - DESPITE
knowing for a fact that the prosectors never examined the throat
wound, or even knew during the autopsy that it was a bullet wound.
That they keep citing the Autopsy is proof that they're desperate -
believers have nothing other than sheer speculation to over-ride the
actual evidence.
At this point, I've demonstrated that the Warren Commission refused to
do an actual investigation... that they had a pre-planned set of
"conclusions" before ever even examining the evidence... that in the
first few *moments* after the assassination, that police rushed
towards the Grassy Knoll... and that the original medical opinion was
for shot(s) hitting JFK from the front.
And all Huckster can do is cry...
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)