Found in the Education Forum:

I guess the biggest issue is the time. Alot of witnesses seem to
think Tippit was shot at 1:06pm for some reason. Why I don't know.

Because they associate an event (the shooting of Tippit) to a specific
time?

Just how dumb can it be to ask why "alot of witnesses" corroborate the
same time...

In ANY OTHER SITUATION - this would be taken by believers as fairly
definitive proof of something ... when you have multiple witnesses corroborating each other.

Only when it doesn't fit the WC theory does it get thrown away.

I know when *I* specify a time for an event - it's because that event
happened at that time. Only a moron would whine that they can't
understand why a time was specified.

But the timing of the call made from Tippits radio, which I believe is
1:16pm, puts the timing of Tippits shooting much later.

Absent any other information - this doesn't even make any sense.

This shows the extent of the poor reasoning skills of believers... and
the inherent dishonesty of believers will be shown by the fact that
not a *SINGLE* believer will acknowledge the poor reasoning shown
here.

They will try to defend it. (Or simply run away.)

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 10:46:21 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
wrote:

Found in the Education Forum:

I guess the biggest issue is the time. Alot of witnesses seem to
think Tippit was shot at 1:06pm for some reason. Why I don't know.

Because they associate an event (the shooting of Tippit) to a specific
time?

Just how dumb can it be to ask why "alot of witnesses" corroborate the
same time...

In ANY OTHER SITUATION - this would be taken by believers as fairly >definitive proof of something ... when you have multiple witnesses >corroborating each other.

Only when it doesn't fit the WC theory does it get thrown away.

I know when *I* specify a time for an event - it's because that event >happened at that time. Only a moron would whine that they can't
understand why a time was specified.

But the timing of the call made from Tippits radio, which I believe is >>1:16pm, puts the timing of Tippits shooting much later.

Absent any other information - this doesn't even make any sense.

This shows the extent of the poor reasoning skills of believers... and
the inherent dishonesty of believers will be shown by the fact that
not a *SINGLE* believer will acknowledge the poor reasoning shown
here.

They will try to defend it. (Or simply run away.)

Chickenshit proved my point...

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 11:30:54 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
wrote:

Your point was:

Found in the Education Forum:

I guess the biggest issue is the time. Alot of witnesses seem to
think Tippit was shot at 1:06pm for some reason. Why I don't know.

Because they associate an event (the shooting of Tippit) to a specific
time?

Just how dumb can it be to ask why "alot of witnesses" corroborate the
same time...

In ANY OTHER SITUATION - this would be taken by believers as fairly
definitive proof of something ... when you have multiple witnesses corroborating each other.

Only when it doesn't fit the WC theory does it get thrown away.

I know when *I* specify a time for an event - it's because that event
happened at that time. Only a moron would whine that they can't
understand why a time was specified.

But the timing of the call made from Tippits radio, which I believe is
1:16pm, puts the timing of Tippits shooting much later.

Absent any other information - this doesn't even make any sense.

This shows the extent of the poor reasoning skills of believers... and
the inherent dishonesty of believers will be shown by the fact that
not a *SINGLE* believer will acknowledge the poor reasoning shown
here.

They will try to defend it. (Or simply run away.)

And Chickenshit proved my point.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 13:52:03 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
wrote:

You are repeating ...

Yep. If you didn't get it the first dozen times, I'll keep repeating
it:

Found in the Education Forum:

I guess the biggest issue is the time. Alot of witnesses seem to
think Tippit was shot at 1:06pm for some reason. Why I don't know.

Because they associate an event (the shooting of Tippit) to a specific
time?

Just how dumb can it be to ask why "alot of witnesses" corroborate the
same time...

In ANY OTHER SITUATION - this would be taken by believers as fairly
definitive proof of something ... when you have multiple witnesses corroborating each other.

Only when it doesn't fit the WC theory does it get thrown away.

I know when *I* specify a time for an event - it's because that event
happened at that time. Only a moron would whine that they can't
understand why a time was specified.

But the timing of the call made from Tippits radio, which I believe is
1:16pm, puts the timing of Tippits shooting much later.

Absent any other information - this doesn't even make any sense.

This shows the extent of the poor reasoning skills of believers... and
the inherent dishonesty of believers will be shown by the fact that
not a *SINGLE* believer will acknowledge the poor reasoning shown
here.

They will try to defend it. (Or simply run away.)

Chickenshit has chosen to do both...

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 13:31:35 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
wrote:

You are repeating ...

Yep. If you didn't get it the first dozen times, I'll keep repeating
it:

Found in the Education Forum:

I guess the biggest issue is the time. Alot of witnesses seem to
think Tippit was shot at 1:06pm for some reason. Why I don't know.

Because they associate an event (the shooting of Tippit) to a specific
time?

Just how dumb can it be to ask why "alot of witnesses" corroborate the
same time...

In ANY OTHER SITUATION - this would be taken by believers as fairly
definitive proof of something ... when you have multiple witnesses corroborating each other.

Only when it doesn't fit the WC theory does it get thrown away.

I know when *I* specify a time for an event - it's because that event
happened at that time. Only a moron would whine that they can't
understand why a time was specified.

But the timing of the call made from Tippits radio, which I believe is
1:16pm, puts the timing of Tippits shooting much later.

Absent any other information - this doesn't even make any sense.

This shows the extent of the poor reasoning skills of believers... and
the inherent dishonesty of believers will be shown by the fact that
not a *SINGLE* believer will acknowledge the poor reasoning shown
here.

They will try to defend it. (Or simply run away.)

Chickenshit has chosen to do both...

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 15:12:22 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
wrote:

You are repeating ...

Yep. If you didn't get it the first dozen times, I'll keep repeating
it:

Found in the Education Forum:

I guess the biggest issue is the time. Alot of witnesses seem to
think Tippit was shot at 1:06pm for some reason. Why I don't know.

Because they associate an event (the shooting of Tippit) to a specific
time?

Just how dumb can it be to ask why "alot of witnesses" corroborate the
same time...

In ANY OTHER SITUATION - this would be taken by believers as fairly
definitive proof of something ... when you have multiple witnesses corroborating each other.

Only when it doesn't fit the WC theory does it get thrown away.

I know when *I* specify a time for an event - it's because that event
happened at that time. Only a moron would whine that they can't
understand why a time was specified.

But the timing of the call made from Tippits radio, which I believe is
1:16pm, puts the timing of Tippits shooting much later.

Absent any other information - this doesn't even make any sense.

This shows the extent of the poor reasoning skills of believers... and
the inherent dishonesty of believers will be shown by the fact that
not a *SINGLE* believer will acknowledge the poor reasoning shown
here.

They will try to defend it. (Or simply run away.)

Chickenshit has chosen to do both...

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 15:28:51 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
wrote:

You are repeating ...

Yep. If you didn't get it the first dozen times, I'll keep repeating
it:

Found in the Education Forum:

I guess the biggest issue is the time. Alot of witnesses seem to
think Tippit was shot at 1:06pm for some reason. Why I don't know.

Because they associate an event (the shooting of Tippit) to a specific
time?

Just how dumb can it be to ask why "alot of witnesses" corroborate the
same time...

In ANY OTHER SITUATION - this would be taken by believers as fairly
definitive proof of something ... when you have multiple witnesses corroborating each other.

Only when it doesn't fit the WC theory does it get thrown away.

I know when *I* specify a time for an event - it's because that event
happened at that time. Only a moron would whine that they can't
understand why a time was specified.

But the timing of the call made from Tippits radio, which I believe is
1:16pm, puts the timing of Tippits shooting much later.

Absent any other information - this doesn't even make any sense.

This shows the extent of the poor reasoning skills of believers... and
the inherent dishonesty of believers will be shown by the fact that
not a *SINGLE* believer will acknowledge the poor reasoning shown
here.

They will try to defend it. (Or simply run away.)

Chickenshit has chosen to do both...

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 16:27:31 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
wrote:

You are repeating ...

Yep. If you didn't get it the first dozen times, I'll keep repeating
it:

Found in the Education Forum:

I guess the biggest issue is the time. Alot of witnesses seem to
think Tippit was shot at 1:06pm for some reason. Why I don't know.

Because they associate an event (the shooting of Tippit) to a specific
time?

Just how dumb can it be to ask why "alot of witnesses" corroborate the
same time...

In ANY OTHER SITUATION - this would be taken by believers as fairly
definitive proof of something ... when you have multiple witnesses corroborating each other.

Only when it doesn't fit the WC theory does it get thrown away.

I know when *I* specify a time for an event - it's because that event
happened at that time. Only a moron would whine that they can't
understand why a time was specified.

But the timing of the call made from Tippits radio, which I believe is
1:16pm, puts the timing of Tippits shooting much later.

Absent any other information - this doesn't even make any sense.

This shows the extent of the poor reasoning skills of believers... and
the inherent dishonesty of believers will be shown by the fact that
not a *SINGLE* believer will acknowledge the poor reasoning shown
here.

They will try to defend it. (Or simply run away.)

Chickenshit has chosen to do both...

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 16:51:17 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
wrote:

You are repeating ...

Yep. If you didn't get it the first dozen times, I'll keep repeating
it:

Found in the Education Forum:

I guess the biggest issue is the time. Alot of witnesses seem to
think Tippit was shot at 1:06pm for some reason. Why I don't know.

Because they associate an event (the shooting of Tippit) to a specific
time?

Just how dumb can it be to ask why "alot of witnesses" corroborate the
same time...

In ANY OTHER SITUATION - this would be taken by believers as fairly
definitive proof of something ... when you have multiple witnesses corroborating each other.

Only when it doesn't fit the WC theory does it get thrown away.

I know when *I* specify a time for an event - it's because that event
happened at that time. Only a moron would whine that they can't
understand why a time was specified.

But the timing of the call made from Tippits radio, which I believe is
1:16pm, puts the timing of Tippits shooting much later.

Absent any other information - this doesn't even make any sense.

This shows the extent of the poor reasoning skills of believers... and
the inherent dishonesty of believers will be shown by the fact that
not a *SINGLE* believer will acknowledge the poor reasoning shown
here.

They will try to defend it. (Or simply run away.)

Chickenshit has chosen to do both...

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 18:48:16 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
wrote:

You are repeating ...

Yep. If you didn't get it the first dozen times, I'll keep repeating
it:

Found in the Education Forum:

I guess the biggest issue is the time. Alot of witnesses seem to
think Tippit was shot at 1:06pm for some reason. Why I don't know.

Because they associate an event (the shooting of Tippit) to a specific
time?

Just how dumb can it be to ask why "alot of witnesses" corroborate the
same time...

In ANY OTHER SITUATION - this would be taken by believers as fairly
definitive proof of something ... when you have multiple witnesses corroborating each other.

Only when it doesn't fit the WC theory does it get thrown away.

I know when *I* specify a time for an event - it's because that event
happened at that time. Only a moron would whine that they can't
understand why a time was specified.

But the timing of the call made from Tippits radio, which I believe is
1:16pm, puts the timing of Tippits shooting much later.

Absent any other information - this doesn't even make any sense.

This shows the extent of the poor reasoning skills of believers... and
the inherent dishonesty of believers will be shown by the fact that
not a *SINGLE* believer will acknowledge the poor reasoning shown
here.

They will try to defend it. (Or simply run away.)

Chickenshit has chosen to do both...

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Sun, 7 Jan 2024 13:49:42 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
wrote:

You are repeating ...

Yep. If you didn't get it the first dozen times, I'll keep repeating
it:

Found in the Education Forum:

I guess the biggest issue is the time. Alot of witnesses seem to
think Tippit was shot at 1:06pm for some reason. Why I don't know.

Because they associate an event (the shooting of Tippit) to a specific
time?

Just how dumb can it be to ask why "alot of witnesses" corroborate the
same time...

In ANY OTHER SITUATION - this would be taken by believers as fairly
definitive proof of something ... when you have multiple witnesses corroborating each other.

Only when it doesn't fit the WC theory does it get thrown away.

I know when *I* specify a time for an event - it's because that event
happened at that time. Only a moron would whine that they can't
understand why a time was specified.

But the timing of the call made from Tippits radio, which I believe is
1:16pm, puts the timing of Tippits shooting much later.

Absent any other information - this doesn't even make any sense.

This shows the extent of the poor reasoning skills of believers... and
the inherent dishonesty of believers will be shown by the fact that
not a *SINGLE* believer will acknowledge the poor reasoning shown
here.

They will try to defend it. (Or simply run away.)

Chickenshit has chosen to do both...

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 09:14:29 -0800 (PST), Gil Jesus
<gjjmail1202@gmail.com> wrote:

On Sunday, January 7, 2024 at 4:49:44?PM UTC-5, Bud wrote:

The opposition is pretty boring at this point, and the topic is
talked out. It was clear to me years and years ago that these guys had
nothing, and all they have done is solidify that assessment (when you
have nothing you have to try to represent nothing as something). I`m
content that I know who killed JFK and how the event played out, what
more do I need?

Funny it wasn't boring until you had to pay.
Funny it's not boring enough to make you walk away right now.
ROFLMAO. You're such a liar.

Chickenshit, like all other believers in this forum, are cowards when
it comes to the evidence in this case.

Dozens and dozens of issues, Chickenshit has simply run from.

Such as his latest demonstrated cowardice, where he's TERRIFIED of
admitting that Bugliosi thought that the "oval shape" of Connally's
back wound was "virtually conclusive evidence" of the SBT.

Chickenshit knows that the moment he publicly agrees that Bugliosi
believed this - that he'll have to explain why JFK's back wound was
ALSO oval.

Liars... cowards... demonstrated characteristics of all believers in
this forum.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 09:35:32 -0800 (PST), Gil Jesus
<gjjmail1202@gmail.com> wrote:

On Monday, January 8, 2024 at 12:29:05?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:

Such as his latest demonstrated cowardice, where he's TERRIFIED of
admitting that Bugliosi thought that the "oval shape" of Connally's
back wound was "virtually conclusive evidence" of the SBT.

Chickenshit knows that the moment he publicly agrees that Bugliosi
believed this - that he'll have to explain why JFK's back wound was
ALSO oval.

And why the "exit" wound in the throat was not oval, but round ( and SMALLER than the oval "entrance" wound in the back )

Liars... cowards... demonstrated characteristics of all believers in this forum.

Agreed.

The facts in this case simply force believers to lie, spout logical
fallacies, or run away...

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 11:44:49 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
wrote:

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)