• Believers *BELIEVE*... Unfortunately, Wacky Things...

    From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jan 4 08:44:17 2024
    Found in another forum:

    Read my long explanation of Oswald's use of the stairs earlier in
    this thread. This is the only solution. No other solution exists or
    possibly exists.

    Of course, the "solution" that Oswald came down via the elevator,
    close to noon - this wack job believes is not possible.

    Not a *SINGLE* believer will acknowledge the stupidity of this fellow
    believer in making such absolute assertions.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to hsienzant@aol.com on Thu Jan 4 16:00:54 2024
    On Thu, 4 Jan 2024 15:29:54 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
    <hsienzant@aol.com> wrote:

    On Thursday, January 4, 2024 at 11:44:23?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
    Found in another forum:

    Read my long explanation of Oswald's use of the stairs earlier in
    this thread. This is the only solution. No other solution exists or
    possibly exists.

    Of course, the "solution" that Oswald came down via the elevator,
    close to noon - this wack job believes is not possible.

    Not a *SINGLE* believer will acknowledge the stupidity of this fellow
    believer in making such absolute assertions.

    Since you provide no link, and no context to what this person is
    saying, your calling him a wack job is meaningless. Nor does your
    quote establish he believes Oswald shot Kennedy alone and unaided.

    These are all unsourced and unproven claims by you, but we are used to that.

    You merely prove the point I made. You have no clue what the
    explanation given is - yet you cannot object to it - since you AGREE
    that no other solution exists.

    You're clearly as much of a moron as the original poster.

    And according to the following, a coward too:

    You've claimed that the "A.B.C.D." in the Autopsy Report is the
    description of the *location* of the large head wound.

    Yet you refuse time and time again from QUOTING the preceding
    paragraph that describes what this ACTUALLY is. Why is that?

    You've also claimed that the prosectors dissected the throat wound.

    Why do you continue to refuse to cite any evidence for this?

    Why have you CONSISTENTLY run away each time I raise this issue?

    Now you've quite stupidly insisted that the bullet entered JFK's back,
    and exited the back of his head.

    More cowardice, more stupidity, more dishonesty.

    Are you proud of yourself?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)