On Wed, 3 Jan 2024 13:44:46 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
<
hsienzant@aol.com> wrote:
Ben has strangely decided not to do what he’d said he do: “…match in length, detail, and number of citations any scenario posted by a believer.”
According to Chuckles, you didn't provide a scenario.
But - of course, you're lying.
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/nCl9JI5ZS30/m/YFhGAy_mAgAJ
Why don't you click on that link, AND RESPOND TO THE POST YOU SAY
DOESN'T EXIST.
Or run again, as you do every time...
Lest you forget the proof of your cowardice:
You've claimed that the "A.B.C.D." in the Autopsy Report is the
description of the *location* of the large head wound.
Yet you refuse time and time again from QUOTING the preceding
paragraph that describes what this ACTUALLY is. Why is that?
You've also claimed that the prosectors dissected the throat wound.
Why do you continue to refuse to cite any evidence for this?
Why have you CONSISTENTLY run away each time I raise this issue?
Now you've quite stupidly insisted that the bullet entered JFK's back,
and exited the back of his head.
More cowardice, more stupidity, more dishonesty.
Are you proud of yourself?
Run coward... RUN!!!
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)