1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. ALT.CONSPIRACY.JFK

  • Need Any More Proof That Huckster Sienzant's A Liar & Coward?

    From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jan 3 16:31:30 2024
    Ben has strangely decided not to do what he’d said he do: “…match
    in length, detail, and number of citations any scenario posted by a believer.”


    Here's the proof that Huckster's a liar and a coward:

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/nCl9JI5ZS30/m/YFhGAy_mAgAJ

    Sadly, Huckster refuses to tell us the length of my response in
    comparison to the length of his scenario.

    He knows I didn't merely "match" it - but far exceeded it.

    And although I've not asked him how many cites I gave in comparison to
    his (zero) - he certainly won't publicly acknowledge this either.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jan 4 07:26:22 2024
    On Wed, 3 Jan 2024 17:21:41 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
    wrote:

    On Wednesday, January 3, 2024 at 7:31:36?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
    Ben has strangely decided not to do what he’d said he do: “…match
    in length, detail, and number of citations any scenario posted by a
    believer.”


    Here's the proof that Huckster's a liar and a coward:

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/nCl9JI5ZS30/m/YFhGAy_mAgAJ >>
    Sadly, Huckster refuses to tell us the length of my response in
    comparison to the length of his scenario.

    He knows I didn't merely "match" it - but far exceeded it.

    And although I've not asked him how many cites I gave in comparison to
    his (zero) - he certainly won't publicly acknowledge this either.

    Logical fallacy deleted.

    Watch folks, as Huckster ABSOLUTELY REFUSES to point out this logical
    fallacy.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to gjjmail1202@gmail.com on Thu Jan 4 07:29:59 2024
    On Thu, 4 Jan 2024 03:06:13 -0800 (PST), Gil Jesus
    <gjjmail1202@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Wednesday, January 3, 2024 at 7:31:36?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:

    Here's the proof that Huckster's a liar and a coward:

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/nCl9JI5ZS30/m/YFhGAy_mAgAJ >>

    Hanky's bought the Warren Commission lies hook, line and sinker.
    The fact that he, or anyone else, would support a lie makes them liars as well.

    Huckster has a tactic he often uses - when things get too hot for him
    in this forum, he disappears for a few weeks. Then comes back and
    pretends the posts he can't answer were never made...

    Anyone care to bet whether Huckster's going to disappear?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jan 4 16:01:32 2024
    On Thu, 4 Jan 2024 15:41:14 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
    wrote:

    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to hsienzant@aol.com on Thu Jan 4 16:04:04 2024
    On Thu, 4 Jan 2024 15:25:13 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
    <hsienzant@aol.com> wrote:

    On Thursday, January 4, 2024 at 6:06:15?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 3, 2024 at 7:31:36?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:

    Here's the proof that Huckster's a liar and a coward:

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/nCl9JI5ZS30/m/YFhGAy_mAgAJ >>>
    Hanky's bought the Warren Commission lies hook, line and sinker.
    The fact that he, or anyone else, would support a lie makes them liars as well.

    So if someone honestly believes something, they are lying if they repeat it?


    You honestly believe that the WCR accurately portrayed Mrs. Tice's
    testimony?

    Clearly you do - because this has been addressed before.

    You're clearly a liar.

    ...
    You're simply calling everyone you disagree with a liar.


    Au Contraire... we're calling LIARS to be liars.

    Here's more proof that you're a liar:

    You've claimed that the "A.B.C.D." in the Autopsy Report is the
    description of the *location* of the large head wound.

    Yet you refuse time and time again from QUOTING the preceding
    paragraph that describes what this ACTUALLY is. Why is that?

    You've also claimed that the prosectors dissected the throat wound.

    Why do you continue to refuse to cite any evidence for this?

    Why have you CONSISTENTLY run away each time I raise this issue?

    Now you've quite stupidly insisted that the bullet entered JFK's back,
    and exited the back of his head.

    More cowardice, more stupidity, more dishonesty.

    Are you proud of yourself?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)