• How Can You Defend The Truth With Cowardice & Lies?

    From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Wed Dec 27 08:21:26 2023
    Title says it all.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Wed Dec 27 10:42:49 2023
    On Wed, 27 Dec 2023 10:30:15 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
    wrote:

    On Wednesday, December 27, 2023 at 11:21:31?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
    Title says it all.

    Chickenshit couldn't answer. So let's go back to his original
    cowardice:

    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to gjjmail1202@gmail.com on Thu Dec 28 07:43:36 2023
    On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 01:21:07 -0800 (PST), Gil Jesus
    <gjjmail1202@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Wednesday, December 27, 2023 at 1:30:16?PM UTC-5, Bud wrote:
    I guess when you have nothing you have to try to make it about other people.

    You mean like you've done to me and Ben ?

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/souhqKNwNBw/m/VxIIx5hOAwAJ

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/pCpewZSJOas/m/W1TwWWsxCAAJ

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/skvoKRgw0WI/m/n7SajAcsBwAJ

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/OPvOE-2se5c/m/I2K_vtPFAAAJ

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/C53l69G9v68/m/v5P8DkbbAwAJ

    In fact, most of the threads you've started have been about "other people".
    I guess that means by your standard, you have nothing.
    I'm not surprised, you've been bullshitting your way through this newsgroup for years.
    And for all the hours you've spent here, you've accomplished absolutely nothing.
    Because you're a loser.

    And, lest we forget, he refuses to defend the faith he holds in the
    WCR. If no-one posts - you'll never see a post from Chickenshit. He
    has nothing to say on his own.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Thu Dec 28 07:45:53 2023
    On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 03:15:20 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
    wrote:

    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    Of course, he can't.

    Chickenshit is smart enough to realize that if he admits that Bugliosi
    DID claim that the oval shape was "virtually conclusive evidence" of
    an SBT, then *HE*, CHICKENSHIT, is going to have to name who the
    person was *BEHIND* JFK.

    And he can't do it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Thu Dec 28 11:13:55 2023
    On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 10:12:36 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
    wrote:

    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Thu Dec 28 12:35:40 2023
    On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 11:38:10 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
    wrote:


    I certainly wouldn`t look to you guys for truth.

    Just unanswerable questions... such as:

    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to gjjmail1202@gmail.com on Thu Dec 28 13:43:48 2023
    On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 12:55:09 -0800 (PST), Gil Jesus
    <gjjmail1202@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Thursday, December 28, 2023 at 1:12:37?PM UTC-5, Bud wrote:
    This isn`t a "defend the WC" forum, stupid.

    The why are you defenders of the Warren Commission here ?

    It's a conspiracy forum, stupid.
    And since you and your asshole buddies don't believe that any conspiracy existed in this case, that means that YOU DON'T BELONG HERE.
    Thanks to Google and other newsreaders that provide free access to the Usenet, you're allowed in, but the fact is YOU DON'T BELONG HERE.

    I'm not surprised you go places where you don't belong.
    Knowing how much of a coward you are, I'll bet you use the little girls room when you have to go.
    Will you turn all paranoid-schizo again the next time a virus comes along ?

    You have a lot of nerve calling other people stupid.
    You're a fucking mental case.

    Well stated. These cowards are constantly defending their refusal to
    support their own beliefs by complaining that this isn't a forum for
    that.

    But even the only forum that ever existed for them, McAdam's forum,
    you cannot find them defending the WCR. They can't.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Thu Dec 28 15:10:33 2023
    On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 14:23:38 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
    wrote:

    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)