1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. ALT.CONSPIRACY.JFK

  • Huckster Joking Again...

    From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 22 10:05:06 2023
    HENRY!!!

    Since you're clearly responding right now... let's see you run from
    this:

    Repost: Getting back to the evidence... a thing that believers HATE:

    "No credible evidence suggests that the shots were fired from the
    railroad bridge over the Triple Underpass, the nearby railroad yards
    or any place other than the Texas School Book Depository Building."
    (WCR 61)

    Only by ignoring the overwhelming mass of eyewitnesses can the WC make
    a statement such as this. And since the legal system in America *does*
    accept eyewitness testimony as "credible evidence", the WC was simply
    lying. ...


    Stop right there. There is no such thing as the U.S. Judicial
    system accepting all eyewitness testimony as "credible evidence" as
    you claim."


    You're lying again, Henry.

    More importantly, you KNOW you're lying.

    Tell us, why do you think that you can support your belief with lies?

    ******************************************************************

    Now tell us Henry... *where* did I state that the U.S. Judicial system
    accepts "all eyewitness testimony as "credible evidence"?

    You stated that I'd made that claim.

    Now QUOTE ME SAYING SO!!!

    Or admit you've been caught "joking" again...

    Or run away again...

    (Such AMAZING cowardice!!!)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to Admin@ConspiracyJFKForum.com on Wed Dec 27 08:16:59 2023
    On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 10:05:06 -0800, Ben Holmes
    <Admin@ConspiracyJFKForum.com> wrote:

    HENRY!!!

    Since you're clearly responding right now... let's see you run from
    this:

    Repost: Getting back to the evidence... a thing that believers HATE:

    "No credible evidence suggests that the shots were fired from the
    railroad bridge over the Triple Underpass, the nearby railroad yards
    or any place other than the Texas School Book Depository Building."
    (WCR 61)

    Only by ignoring the overwhelming mass of eyewitnesses can the WC make
    a statement such as this. And since the legal system in America *does*
    accept eyewitness testimony as "credible evidence", the WC was simply
    lying. ...


    Stop right there. There is no such thing as the U.S. Judicial
    system accepting all eyewitness testimony as "credible evidence" as
    you claim."


    You're lying again, Henry.

    More importantly, you KNOW you're lying.

    Tell us, why do you think that you can support your belief with lies?

    ******************************************************************

    Now tell us Henry... *where* did I state that the U.S. Judicial system >accepts "all eyewitness testimony as "credible evidence"?

    You stated that I'd made that claim.

    Now QUOTE ME SAYING SO!!!

    Or admit you've been caught "joking" again...

    Or run away again...

    (Such AMAZING cowardice!!!)


    What's really funny is that even Chickenshit, who likes to reflexively
    respond to anything I post - is silent.

    He can't defend Huckster either.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)