1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. ALT.CONSPIRACY.JFK

  • Huckster Sienzan - Proven Moron!

    From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to hsienzant@aol.com on Fri Dec 22 10:03:23 2023
    On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 02:49:19 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
    <hsienzant@aol.com> wrote:

    On Wednesday, January 20, 2021 at 7:27:12 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 15:57:31 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
    <hsie...@aol.com> wrote:

    On Wednesday, January 20, 2021 at 5:25:11 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Tue, 19 Jan 2021 16:41:50 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
    <hsie...@aol.com> wrote:

    On Monday, January 18, 2021 at 9:26:23 AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Thu, 31 Dec 2020 06:51:20 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
    wrote:

    You snipped what Bud wrote...

    Snipped again.

    So avoidance of the points made. Noted.

    Hypocrite, aren't you?

    Why do you say that, Ben?


    I'm a big believer in the truth... I know you HATE such things to be
    pointed out... but they're true regardless.


    P.S. You really *should* go help out Chickenshit - he thinks that the
    location of the large head wound described by the prosectors is
    described by the A, B, C, D subparagraphs.

    Attempt to shift the burden of proof.


    So you actually believe that the location of the large head wound in
    JFK is to be defined by subpara A,B,C,D???

    You're just as much a moron as Chickenshit.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to Admin@ConspiracyJFKForum.com on Fri Dec 22 10:06:26 2023
    On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 10:03:23 -0800, Ben Holmes
    <Admin@ConspiracyJFKForum.com> wrote:

    On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 02:49:19 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
    <hsienzant@aol.com> wrote:

    On Wednesday, January 20, 2021 at 7:27:12 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 15:57:31 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
    <hsie...@aol.com> wrote:

    On Wednesday, January 20, 2021 at 5:25:11 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Tue, 19 Jan 2021 16:41:50 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
    <hsie...@aol.com> wrote:

    On Monday, January 18, 2021 at 9:26:23 AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Dec 2020 06:51:20 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>>> wrote:

    You snipped what Bud wrote...

    Snipped again.

    So avoidance of the points made. Noted.

    Hypocrite, aren't you?

    Why do you say that, Ben?


    I'm a big believer in the truth... I know you HATE such things to be
    pointed out... but they're true regardless.


    P.S. You really *should* go help out Chickenshit - he thinks that the
    location of the large head wound described by the prosectors is
    described by the A, B, C, D subparagraphs.

    Attempt to shift the burden of proof.


    So you actually believe that the location of the large head wound in
    JFK is to be defined by subpara A,B,C,D???

    You're just as much a moron as Chickenshit.

    Dropped a 't' somewhere... put it back in.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to Admin@ConspiracyJFKForum.com on Wed Dec 27 08:17:36 2023
    On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 10:03:23 -0800, Ben Holmes
    <Admin@ConspiracyJFKForum.com> wrote:

    On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 02:49:19 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
    <hsienzant@aol.com> wrote:

    On Wednesday, January 20, 2021 at 7:27:12 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 15:57:31 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
    <hsie...@aol.com> wrote:

    On Wednesday, January 20, 2021 at 5:25:11 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Tue, 19 Jan 2021 16:41:50 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
    <hsie...@aol.com> wrote:

    On Monday, January 18, 2021 at 9:26:23 AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Dec 2020 06:51:20 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>>> wrote:

    You snipped what Bud wrote...

    Snipped again.

    So avoidance of the points made. Noted.

    Hypocrite, aren't you?

    Why do you say that, Ben?


    I'm a big believer in the truth... I know you HATE such things to be
    pointed out... but they're true regardless.


    P.S. You really *should* go help out Chickenshit - he thinks that the
    location of the large head wound described by the prosectors is
    described by the A, B, C, D subparagraphs.

    Attempt to shift the burden of proof.


    So you actually believe that the location of the large head wound in
    JFK is to be defined by subpara A,B,C,D???

    You're just as much a moron as Chickenshit.


    Even Huckster is unwilling to defend Chickenshit's wacky assertion.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)