Posted over a decade ago - it's truth is still plainly evident:
Taken from the censored (alt.assassination.jfk) forum:
If when he was in the anatomical errect postion, the back wound appeared
to be slightly lower than, at the same level, or even slightly above the
the throat wound, it wouldn't have taken a rocket scientist to conclude
the trajectory might not be consistent with a shot from six floors up.
No doubt, this statement will be a key piece of evidence in his trial
to throw him out as a LNT'er in good standing.
The HSCA, of course, admitting that the back wound was *LOWER* than
the throat wound.
Ford did too, by his verbal moving of the wound from the back to the
neck.
The kooks can't explain this... very simple math will tell you just
how far ABOVE the throat wound the back wound has to be... but isn't.
Just as the entry near the EOP had to be moved up by approximately
four inches, they knew the trajectories didn't make sense (recall that
the Warren Commission refused to allow several ballistics experts to
testify because they weren't going to support the SBT.)
This 'expert shopping' is despicable in a commission supposedly
seeking the truth.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)