1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. ALT.CONSPIRACY.JFK

  • The Most Frequently Told Lie By Believers...

    From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Tue Dec 19 07:49:59 2023
    "No credible evidence..."

    I'd be a rich man if I had a nickel for everytime a believer posted
    that phrase...

    It is, of course, a meaningless phrase... believers like Corbutt
    cannot support it by any citation to ANYTHING... so all they're really
    saying is that they don't believe the evidence.

    That is, of course, EXACTLY the problem - they believe a bunch of
    lawyers, untrained in any investigative procedures, to tell us what
    happened.

    Never mind that these lawyers flat LIED about their own collected
    testimony from eyewitnesses... because believers will never
    acknowledge this fact.

    Never mind that the average person finds dozens of witnesses who
    pointed to the GK "credible" - that means nothing to believers. It's
    not "credible" to "them.*

    It's good to see Corbutt finally throwing in the towel, and running
    away for good. One less liar to refute on a daily basis.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Wed Dec 20 07:25:07 2023
    On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 12:27:51 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
    wrote:

    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Wed Dec 20 08:40:46 2023
    On Wed, 20 Dec 2023 08:38:33 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
    wrote:

    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)