On Sat, 16 Dec 2023 05:10:02 -0800 (PST), JE Corbett
<jecorbett4@gmail.com> wrote:

LNs talk about what happened on 11/22/63 and most believe it happened
just as the WC told us it did way back in September of 1964.

That's simply a lie. You aren't ignorant of the polling which shows
that most of America disagrees with the WCR - but for some strange
reason you don't mind telling whoppers that can easily be refuted.

CTs spend most of their time telling us what didn't happen. They tell us not >to believe what the WC told us way back in September of 1964.

When you're forced to lie, all you've proven is that you're a liar.

While the CTs have widely divergent theories about who was behind the >assassination, none of them will tell us how it happened nor present any >evidence supporting their beliefs.

There you go again.

They spend at least 90% of their time
telling us why we should not trust the evidence presented to us by the WC.

We rightfully don't trust proven liars.

The employ the tactic of addition by subtraction. If they can eliminate all >the evidence that Oswald was the assassin, that gives them the blank
canvass they need to fingerpaint their own picture of what happened back
on 11/22/63. It's a silly way to look at any case. They are looking through >the wrong end of the telescope.

A meaningless whine.

An entire post of lies and logical fallacies... is anyone surprised?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Sat, 16 Dec 2023 10:50:58 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
wrote:

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 05:42:54 -0800 (PST), JE Corbett
<jecorbett4@gmail.com> wrote:

On Tuesday, December 19, 2023 at 7:21:32?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:

On Saturday, December 16, 2023 at 3:03:47?PM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:

To convince them why their minds shouldn't be made up. But since you can't do that, why should anyone change their minds?

Bullshit. Don't make it sound like you're open minded. You're not.
In fact, this very thread started by you is nothing more than another flame job directed at the WC critics.
That's all you people are doing now that you see the end of free posting in sight.
Every one of your posts is an attack on either me, Ben or the critical community in general.
Instead of going out of here in class, you people are going out proving to the world what pieces of shit you really are.

Come February 15, instead of preaching to 12 people, you'll be preaching to 2.

One difference is that after February 15th, you will no longer be able to post your silly comments and insults.
But you WILL be able to read posts made through other servers until February 22nd. Then no more Google usenet.
Google will no longer provide support for either new posting or reading posts after February 22nd.

It'll be fun posting between February 15th and the 22nd, knowing that you're reading our posts and not able to respond.
It'll be fun knowing how much it's killing you to lose that "priviledge".
But don't worry, if you DO change your mind and decide to "pay to play", we'll just killfilter you, rendering your insults worthless.
Face it, the Golden Era for trolls is over.

Do you really think that Google is the only newsreader out there ?
Do you really think that Google is the only source of readers ?
ROFLMAO.

Another difference is that Ben and I will continue to post evidence critical to the Warren Commission's findings which will be seen by a potential world wide audience.
Anyone in the world who has a newsreader ( free or pay ) and is subscribed to this newsgroup will see our posts.
But they won't see yours.

Have fun.

We intend to.

Google is going haywire right now so I am bottom posting.

I am not open minded about the possibility of Oswald's innocence.
The time for that expired a long time ago. I would be open minded
about a conspiracy if I was ever presented any credible evidence of one.

Credible evidence is posted all the time. Some of which was known on 11/22/63... such as the entry wound in JFK's throat, and the dozens of witnesses to shots coming from the GK.

You simply deny that it's credible - but most of America disagrees
with you.


I was forced to delete the rest of your rant, since it was nothing but
logical fallacies.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 12:33:37 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
wrote:

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)