On Sat, 16 Dec 2023 17:10:56 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
<hsienzant@aol.com> wrote:

You've claimed that the "A.B.C.D." in the Autopsy Report is the
description of the *location* of the large head wound.

Yet you refuse time and time again from QUOTING the preceding
paragraph that describes what this ACTUALLY is. Why is that?

You've also claimed that the prosectors dissected the throat wound.

Why do you continue to refuse to cite any evidence for this?

Why have you CONSISTENTLY run away each time I raise this issue?

Now you've quite stupidly insisted that the bullet entered JFK's back,
and exited the back of his head.

More cowardice, more stupidity, more dishonesty.

Are you proud of yourself?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Sat, 16 Dec 2023 13:16:51 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
wrote:

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Sat, 16 Dec 2023 05:22:22 -0800 (PST), JE Corbett
<jecorbett4@gmail.com> wrote:

I doubt I will. Just not worth the time or expense of getting a new newsreader.

Why wait? Leave now!

Deleted the rest of your nonsense so you wouldn't cry.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Mon, 18 Dec 2023 08:29:55 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
wrote:

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Mon, 18 Dec 2023 08:55:26 -0800 (PST), JE Corbett
<jecorbett4@gmail.com> wrote:

Yellowpanties is never going to change. He whines that nobody will debate him. He doesn't seem to understand that debate
is a give and take process. Point/counterpoint. One person makes and argument, the other person makes a rebuttal and the
first person responds to that. All Yellowpanties can do is delete a person's argument and label it a logical fantasy, then cries
that nobody has the guts to debate him. How do you debate someone who won't respond to what you write.

I own Corbutt!!! He can't get me out of his head!

I'm going to lurk a while after February 15 just to see which, if any, of these assclowns are still posting their crap here and
if any of them are getting any responses.

Not without paying, you aren't. ROTFLMAO!!!

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Mon, 18 Dec 2023 10:52:23 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
wrote:

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Mon, 18 Dec 2023 10:15:50 -0800 (PST), Gil Jesus
<gjjmail1202@gmail.com> wrote:

On Monday, December 18, 2023 at 10:33:37?AM UTC-5, BT George wrote:
< a response to John Corbett >

See my comment on another thread to Bud. Without the 2 of you this place would be devoid of all intelligent life.

You mean the same John Corbett who said that they didn't dust the rifle for fingerprints at the crime scene ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RV7uLMSs4KQ

You mean the same "Bud" who said that the "paper gunsack" was 41 inches long ? >https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/33a9MbNPYEg/m/rT_ERTztAgAJ

That's what you consider intelligent life ?

If you think these two idiots are intelligent, you must be dumber than they are. Only then would they seem intelligent to you.

ROFLMAO

It's good that someone reads troll posts... my killfilter simply marks
them read, or deletes them completely - depending on what I set.

BT George couldn't make an intelligent defense of the WCR to save his
life.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Mon, 18 Dec 2023 11:01:04 -0800 (PST), JE Corbett
<jecorbett4@gmail.com> wrote:

On Monday, December 18, 2023 at 1:15:52?PM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:

On Monday, December 18, 2023 at 10:33:37?AM UTC-5, BT George wrote:
< a response to John Corbett >

See my comment on another thread to Bud. Without the 2 of you this place would be devoid of all intelligent life.

You mean the same John Corbett who said that they didn't dust the rifle for fingerprints at the crime scene ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RV7uLMSs4KQ

Giltardo...

Where's Huckster when you need him to point out that "When you start
with ad hominem we know it won't go well for you..."

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wed, 20 Dec 2023 03:50:41 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
wrote:

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 09:19:54 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
<hsienzant@aol.com> wrote:

You've claimed that the "A.B.C.D." in the Autopsy Report is the
description of the *location* of the large head wound.

Yet you refuse time and time again from QUOTING the preceding
paragraph that describes what this ACTUALLY is. Why is that?

You've also claimed that the prosectors dissected the throat wound.

Why do you continue to refuse to cite any evidence for this?

Why have you CONSISTENTLY run away each time I raise this issue?

Now you've quite stupidly insisted that the bullet entered JFK's back,
and exited the back of his head.

More cowardice, more stupidity, more dishonesty.

Are you proud of yourself?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wed, 20 Dec 2023 09:03:33 -0800 (PST), Gil Jesus
<gjjmail1202@gmail.com> wrote:

On Wednesday, December 20, 2023 at 6:50:42?AM UTC-5, Bud wrote:

As I understand it, using Google you’ll be able to read the posts through 2/15/24, but nothing thereafter:

That is what Hank said, stupid. Google changed the date from the 15th to the 22nd in the notification, but everything else is what Hank related.

No that's not what he said, stupid.
He said you wouldn't be able to read posts after 2/15.
That's not true.
You'll be able to read posts after 2/22, just only the ones posted before that date.

Are you the stupidest motherfucker in your family or do they come dumber than you ?

I'm sure you understand that the answer to your question isn't of
interest to anyone. Chickenshit is simply something you put up with.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wed, 20 Dec 2023 09:14:39 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
wrote:

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)