1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. ALT.CONSPIRACY.JFK

  • Re: "Google Groups will no longer support new Usenet content"

    From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 15 07:39:22 2023
    On Thu, 14 Dec 2023 17:59:31 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
    <hsienzant@aol.com> wrote:

    You've claimed that the "A.B.C.D." in the Autopsy Report is the
    description of the *location* of the large head wound.

    Yet you refuse time and time again from QUOTING the preceding
    paragraph that describes what this ACTUALLY is. Why is that?

    You've also claimed that the prosectors dissected the throat wound.

    Why do you continue to refuse to cite any evidence for this?

    Why have you CONSISTENTLY run away each time I raise this issue?

    Now you've quite stupidly insisted that the bullet entered JFK's back,
    and exited the back of his head.

    More cowardice, more stupidity, more dishonesty.

    Are you proud of yourself?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to jecorbett4@gmail.com on Fri Dec 15 07:40:49 2023
    On Fri, 15 Dec 2023 03:22:26 -0800 (PST), JE Corbett
    <jecorbett4@gmail.com> wrote:

    This reminds me of the early 1990s when our Prodigy group broke up over their change in pricing policies.

    It's all good. It can be amusing exposing the silliness of the CTs but I'll be damned if I'm going to pay for the privilege.

    When I was having trouble with Google a couple months ago, I explored other alternatives but the only free ones were for
    trial periods only. I also found them difficult to use as opposed to Google Groups which is pretty intuitive.

    The Good News never stops coming! I can hardly wait until Google says
    goodbye!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 15 16:37:46 2023
    On Fri, 15 Dec 2023 16:24:22 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
    <hsienzant@aol.com> wrote:

    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Mon Dec 18 07:26:08 2023
    On Fri, 15 Dec 2023 18:17:47 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
    wrote:

    On Friday, December 15, 2023 at 7:37:48?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Fri, 15 Dec 2023 16:24:22 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
    <hsie...@aol.com> wrote:

    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    You posted the wrong rote response, stupid.

    As Huckster claimed you spoke for him, clearly you've just been caught
    in a lie again...

    What a moron!!!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)