Yes, I know. He's fat, ugly, bald, and stupid, but all is not lost. He
could possibly lose some weight.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thu, 14 Dec 2023 09:07:18 -0800 (PST), David Von Pein
<davevonpein@aol.com> wrote:

On Thursday, December 14, 2023 at 11:47:07?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:

Could Connally's movements have been caused by something other than a bullet?

Here's what Von Penis snipped without being able to answer it:

Yes, I know. He's fat, ugly, bald, and stupid, but all is not lost. He could possibly lose some weight.

I may be fat, but he's ugly and I can lose weight.

I don't believe there's any hope for him, even after they extricate his nose from Von Pein's ass.

Don't get him started on the "lapel flip".
He's convinced that Connally was told by "someone else" that Kennedy had been shot, but he can't prove it.
He's convinced there was a "bulge" in Connally's coat caused by a bullet, although he can't prove it.
He's convinced Connally's arm moving upward was caused by a bullet, although he can't prove it.

Corbett believes in things that can't be proven. Speculations made by David Von Pein.
Could Connally's movements have been caused by something other than a bullet ?

Here's John Connally saying that as the crowds thinned out, he was re-adjusting his seating position.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/connally-straightening-up.mp4

Is it possible for the anti-SBTers to exhibit MORE denial than the
examples displayed at the link below?

I've told you before, if you can't post it HERE, and defend it HERE,
then it won't be allowed.

Pay attention coward!

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thu, 14 Dec 2023 08:47:04 -0800 (PST), Gil Jesus
<gjjmail1202@gmail.com> wrote:

On Thursday, December 14, 2023 at 10:58:38?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:

Yes, I know. He's fat, ugly, bald, and stupid, but all is not lost. He could possibly lose some weight.

I may be fat, but he's ugly and I can lose weight.

I don't believe there's any hope for him, even after they extricate his nose from Von Pein's ass.

Don't get him started on the "lapel flip".

The point is - believers for a long time spoke of a mythical "lapel
flip" ... and now it's morphed into a "bulge."

So clearly they've changed their minds, and *should* be honest enough
to admit that their previous view on a "lapel flip" was wrong. But,
of course, they aren't honest.

He's convinced that Connally was told by "someone else" that Kennedy had been shot, but he can't prove it.

Speculation is a powerful tool when you don't have any facts.

He's convinced there was a "bulge" in Connally's coat caused by a bullet, although he can't prove it.

I suspect that the idea that the wind could flip a lapel, but only a
bullet could cause a "bulge" had a lot to do with their new theory.

And make no mistake, THIS IS A *NEW* THEORY.

But they can't admit it.

He's convinced Connally's arm moving upward was caused by a bullet, although he can't prove it.

Corbett believes in things that can't be proven. Speculations made by David Von Pein.
Could Connally's movements have been caused by something other than a bullet ?

Here's John Connally saying that as the crowds thinned out, he was re-adjusting his seating position.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/connally-straightening-up.mp4

Don't worry, Corbutt doesn't believe Connally.

He doesn't believe **ANY** eyewitness. He counts on the mythical
"forensic evidence" he refuses to cite for.

And because I point these facts out, he refuses to reply.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thu, 14 Dec 2023 12:45:01 -0800 (PST), JE Corbett
<jecorbett4@gmail.com> wrote:

On Thursday, December 14, 2023 at 11:47:07?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:

On Thursday, December 14, 2023 at 10:58:38?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:

Yes, I know. He's fat, ugly, bald, and stupid, but all is not lost. He could possibly lose some weight.

I may be fat, but he's ugly and I can lose weight.

I don't believe there's any hope for him, even after they extricate his nose from Von Pein's ass.

Don't get him started on the "lapel flip".
He's convinced that Connally was told by "someone else" that Kennedy had been shot, but he can't prove it.

I've proven...

Speculation isn't evidence.

He's convinced there was a "bulge" in Connally's coat caused by a bullet, although he can't prove it.

We see JBC's coat bulge out ...

Used to be a "lapel flip"... did the video change in the last few
years?

He's convinced Connally's arm moving upward was caused by a bullet, although he can't prove it.

Just a remarkable coincidence...

That your faith is founded on speculation?

Corbett believes in things that can't be proven. Speculations made by David Von Pein.

Corbutt believes in logical conclusions based on known evidence.

You're lying again, Corbutt.

Could Connally's movements have been caused by something other than a bullet ?

Theoretically.

Then you lose.

What you think is "proven" you've just admitted... isn't.

Here's John Connally saying that as the crowds thinned out, he was re-adjusting his seating position.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/connally-straightening-up.mp4

Of course,

You acknowledge a fact, then you run from it.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thu, 14 Dec 2023 14:04:10 -0800 (PST), JE Corbett
<jecorbett4@gmail.com> wrote:

Are you interested in a job as my proof reader? It will require long hours and the pay isn't very good.

And the only requirements are an ability to read, and an inability to
tell the truth.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thu, 14 Dec 2023 13:03:01 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
wrote:

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thu, 14 Dec 2023 14:00:17 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
<hsienzant@aol.com> wrote:

You've claimed that the "A.B.C.D." in the Autopsy Report is the
description of the *location* of the large head wound.

Yet you refuse time and time again from QUOTING the preceding
paragraph that describes what this ACTUALLY is. Why is that?

You've also claimed that the prosectors dissected the throat wound.

Why do you continue to refuse to cite any evidence for this?

Why have you CONSISTENTLY run away each time I raise this issue?

Now you've quite stupidly insisted that the bullet entered JFK's back,
and exited the back of his head.

More cowardice, more stupidity, more dishonesty.

Are you proud of yourself?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)