On Friday, December 8, 2023 at 9:02:37?AM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:
That's because the prosectors saw the trail of tissue damage the led from the entry wound on the back directly to the incision in the throat
Source ?
On Friday, December 8, 2023 at 7:31:34?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Friday, December 8, 2023 at 6:26:30?AM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:
< more stupid comments and insults from an idiot >
Says the guy who doesn't believe the Dallas doctors who SAW the hole in the throat and described it as a wound of entry,
but believes the autopsists who never saw the hole.
That's because the prosectors saw the trail of tissue damage the led from the entry wound on the back directly to the
incision in the throat and weren't as dumb as you.
On Friday, December 8, 2023 at 5:44:17?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:of the bone. ( pg. 93 )
On Friday, December 8, 2023 at 1:07:02?AM UTC-5, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
https://postimg.cc/QBWy6xKsTrue dat.
Just another coincidence? Don't be silly. Connally was also shot from the front.
The Warren Commission changed Dr. Gregory's descriptions of the wrist wounds to hide the fact that CE 399 was not the bullet that caused them.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/body-diagrams-comparison.png
Dr. Charles Gregory, who operated on the wrist, testified that the bullet entered on the dorsal side ( back side ) of the wrist and exited the volar side ( palm side ).
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/WC_Vol4_118_119-dr-gregory-wrist-wound.gif
For this to have been a shot from behind, the back of Connally's hand would have had to have been facing him when he was struck.
The Zapruder film shows no such position of the wrist.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/z230.png
Even the Warren Report had to admit that Dr. Gregory, "observed a linear perforating wound" that was located on " the back of his ( Connally's ) arm" that was, "the point of entry because thread and cloth had been carried into the wound to the region
There's no evidence that the bullet entered on the palm side of the wrist and exited the dorsal side as required by the Single Bullshit Theory.
By changing Dr. Gregory's descriptions, they changed the direction of the bullet that struck the wrist from front-to-rear to rear-to-front.
Oh, Goody. The assclowns are playing doctor again. How about a cite where the WC states the bullet entered on the palm
side of the wrist.
It is not possible for the bullet that struck Connally's wrist to have come from in front.
His wrist was struck
while he was holding his hat in his lap, well below the top of side of the car.
The shot had to come from an elevated
position and there was no position in front of the limo that would have provided a line of fire into Connally's wrist.
Do you guys ever think things out before you bother posting them?
On Friday, December 8, 2023 at 8:11:13?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:the seasoned politician. The spent bullet came to rest on the back seat, later to be picked up by a guilt-ridden and somewhat intoxicated SS agent.
On Friday, December 8, 2023 at 7:59:14?AM UTC-5, Mark Ulrik wrote:
Don't you understand? The part where Connally turned around and waved, exposing the dorsal side of his wrist to the knoll shooter, was edited out of the Z-film. The intended target was actually Jackie, but the gunman underestimated the hand speed of
Source ?
The sarcasm seems to have gone right over Giltardo's head.
On Friday, December 8, 2023 at 9:31:03?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Friday, December 8, 2023 at 9:03:59?AM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:
The sarcasm seems to have gone right over Giltardo's head.Not really.
Then why did you ask for a source?
On Friday, December 8, 2023 at 7:59:14?AM UTC-5, Mark Ulrik wrote:the seasoned politician. The spent bullet came to rest on the back seat, later to be picked up by a guilt-ridden and somewhat intoxicated SS agent.
Don't you understand? The part where Connally turned around and waved, exposing the dorsal side of his wrist to the knoll shooter, was edited out of the Z-film. The intended target was actually Jackie, but the gunman underestimated the hand speed of
Source ?
On Friday, December 8, 2023 at 9:23:54?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Friday, December 8, 2023 at 9:02:37?AM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:
Source ?That's because the prosectors saw the trail of tissue damage the led from the entry wound on the back directly to the incision in the throat
I gave you the source in another thread, Giltardo. Did you bother to read it. Here it is again:
https://www.autopsyfiles.org/reports/Other/kennedy,%20john_report.pdf
Can you read or do you need an audio book of it? The description of the trail of tissue damage begins at the last sentence
on page 4 and continues through to page 6. It's a quick read and very informative.
On Friday, December 8, 2023 at 10:22:00?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Friday, December 8, 2023 at 10:02:59?AM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:
The description of the trail of tissue damage begins at the last sentence >>> on page 4 and continues through to page 6. It's a quick read and very informative.You mean where it says that the missile path, "cannot be easily probed" ?
I suppose it never entered that pinhead of yours that there are
other ways of determining a bullet path other than a probe.
In this case, they removed the organs from the chest cavity
and observed the tissue damage and saw the trail of damage
that led from the back entrance to the throat exit.
You mean where it says that the wound described by Dr. Perry was "presumably of exit " ?
Yes, when you see an entrance wound, a line of tissue damage leading from that wound, to a wound in the throat, it's safe
to presume that is where the bullet exited since it was no longer in the body. This isn't rocket science. This is adding 2 + 2
and presuming the answer is 4.
THAT autopsy report ?
Where in that autopsy report does it say that they missed the bullet hole in the throat and didn't find out about it until the next day ?
Christ, do you need everything spelled out for you.
On Friday, December 8, 2023 at 11:54:32?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Friday, December 8, 2023 at 11:31:41?AM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:
I suppose it never entered that pinhead of yours that there are other ways of determining a bullet path other than a probe.Source ?
How about the autopsy report which I have already posted for you twice which explains how the pathologists were able to
find the bullet track without using a probe.
You might want to check Finck's Clay Shaw trial testimony which explains why using a probe can create a false channel in
soft tissue.
The probe could only go in a fraction of an inch. Are we supposed to believe that indicates the bullet only went in a fraction
of an inch or does it make more sense to believe the bullet traveled much deeper than the probe could go?
On Saturday, December 9, 2023 at 2:54:03?PM UTC-5, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
On Saturday, December 9, 2023 at 11:12:58?AM UTC-5, recip...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, December 9, 2023 at 2:29:59?AM UTC-6, NoTrueFlags Here wrote: >>>> On Friday, December 8, 2023 at 1:07:02?AM UTC-5, NoTrueFlags Here wrote: >>>>> https://postimg.cc/QBWy6xKsYes. I think that is correct. The Dr. Shaw testimony clarifies that for me. It seems the Secret Service is not guilty on this point. But, Connally's wrist still was shot from the front, as Zapruder frame 322 demonstrates.
So, when the Secret Service realized that there was a problem with the bullet entering the under side of the wrist, they had a chat with the doctors and changed the entry to the top side of the wrist. And Dr, Gregory went along with that.
Just another coincidence? Don't be silly. Connally was also shot from the front.
In his 11/22/63 operative report, Gregory put the entry on the dorsal side of the wrist. The only mind that got changed was Shaw's
Impossible
NTF continues to rave.
On Friday, December 8, 2023 at 11:50:58?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Friday, December 8, 2023 at 11:31:41?AM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:
In this case, they removed the organs from the chest cavity and observed the tissue damage and saw the trail of damage that led from the back entrance to the throat exit.So in other words, I could gut you like a fish, stick a probe up your ass and make it come out your mouth.
If the probe was long enough, probably so.
What would that prove ?
Nothing, which is why there are better ways of determine a bullet
track than using a probe.
That your mouth was a wound of exit ?
I find it creepy you would want to stick a probe up my ass.
On Friday, December 8, 2023 at 3:18:08?PM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:
How about the autopsy report which I have already posted for you twice which explains how the pathologists were able to find the bullet track without using a probe.
How about this ? How abaout that ?
We're talking about Connally's wrist wound.
Please try to keep up.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 127:05:58 |
| Calls: | 6,663 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 12,212 |
| Messages: | 5,335,079 |
