• Why Does EVERY SINGLE BELIEVER Show Cowardice?

    From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to Ad...@ConspiracyJFKForum.com on Thu Dec 7 09:30:02 2023
    On Wednesday, May 11, 2022 at 9:22:15 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Mon, 09 May 2022 14:16:19 -0700, Ben Holmes
    <Ad...@ConspiracyJFKForum.com> wrote:

    On Mon, 9 May 2022 13:12:23 -0700 (PDT), Christopher Strimbu ><christoph...@yahoo.com> wrote:

    On Monday, May 9, 2022 at 3:57:00 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
    Okay, here's a simple challenge, and I'll let **YOU** go first.

    You ask an evidential question on the JFK case, and I'll answer it
    completely and credibly.

    Then **I** ask a question, and you give just as detailed an answer,
    with just as many citations to the evidence that supports it as I do.

    Then, assuming you actually answer... I'll post both question & answer
    to a polling site - and we'll see who provided the better answer.

    Or, of course, you can run again... as believers do...

    EVERY

    SINGLE

    TIME!

    Alright.

    How many shots hit Kennedy and Connally, and from which directions?
    Citations please. Preferably from primary sources.

    A minimum of three shots hit JFK, see Autopsy Report for two of the
    three shots, (One in the back, one in the back of the head) >http://www.autopsyfiles.org/reports/Other/kennedy,%20john_report.pdf

    See WCR's listing of Bethesda testimony & reports for the entry wound
    in the throat from the front - Appendix VIII beginning on page 516. So
    that's two shots from the back, and one shot from the front. You can
    also review the Parkland Press Conference for more evidence of the
    frontal throat wound. >http://22november1963.org.uk/jfk-parkland-hospital-press-conference

    So to summarize - JFK - three shots minimum. One or two from behind,
    one from the front, and one possibly from the side. (From the GK)

    If the head shot was from the GK, it was a tangential hit. Two doctors >asserted this possibility:
    Dr. Kemp Clark - in the Press Conference cited above.
    Dr. Gene Akin - WC Testimony - >https://www.jfk-assassination.net/russ/testimony/akin.htm

    Connally was hit as many as three times, according to the doctor who
    treated him:
    https://www.jfk-assassination.net/russ/testimony/shaw1.htm

    I rather suspect that he was only struck twice, once from behind, and
    once from the GK. That GK shot his his wrist - which it was quite
    carefully pointed out by the doctors who treated him that the path was
    from the outside of the wrist to the palm side. See Dr. Gregory's
    testimony here:
    https://www.jfk-assassination.net/russ/testimony/gregory1.htm

    Quite completely incompatible with a shot following a trajectory out
    of the chest. (As Dr. Shaw pointed out - see below)

    Not a *SINGLE* believer has ever accounted for the wrist wound, and
    indeed, cannot show how such a trajectory would be... Dr. Shaw also
    pointed this out in the testimony cited above, and quoted here:

    Mr. McCLOY - We are talking about the, following up what Mr. Dulles
    said about the angle of declination, the wound that came through the >President's collar, you said was consistent between the same bullet. I
    just wondered whether under all the circumstances that you know about
    the President's head wound on the top that would also be consistent
    with a wound in Governor Connally's body?
    Dr. SHAW - On the chest, yes; I am not so sure about the wrist. I
    can't quite place where his wrist was at the time his chest was
    struck.

    The shot from the wrist was the one most likely to account for the
    wound in his thigh.

    Summary - At least two shots, and possibly three struck Connally. One
    from behind, one or two from the side (From the GK)

    Now the question for you... you should be familar with it, since
    you've seen it time and time again - and have refused to answer it >repeatedly...

    List all relevant citations & evidence that would allow someone to
    determine when JFK's body arrived at Bethesda. If you omit any
    evidence that has been posted publicly in this forum in the last month
    or two - you'll provably demonstrate yourself to be a liar by
    omission.

    Balls in your court, Chrissy!

    Chrissy has no balls. Looks like there's no need to put anything to a
    poll, I've won.

    Chrissy ran.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)