My all time favorite is when he adopted the position that the Parkland
Press Conference transcript was an altered document, that *used* to
have the doctors saying that the throat wound could have been an exit.
Make up some more fertilizer. You won't be able to quote me saying either of those things you claim above.
...Ah, but both you and I *KNOW* you're lying. So why should I prove
it to you?
Logical fallacy on Ben's part.
It's the truth, Henry.
You know it.
I know it.
Still an unproven assertion on your part. If you found my quote saying
what you claim I said, you'd have posted it by now. You haven't found
it (and in fact, you probably did affirm what I actually said and
realize that your claim was in error, so to save face and avoid
admitting you had a failure of memory, you're simply calling me a liar
and claiming your original point is true."
Okay Henry ... time to face the music.
Here was your ORIGINAL claim:
************************************************
Nobody told him there was an entry wound in the head, and you are
simply inferring that by pointing to that area he meant there was an
*entry* wound there.
On *what* are you basing that speculation, Henry? Do you have ANY
first-hand statements to base that on?
Let's not kid anyone, Ben. The entry wound to the head was not
determined until that evening at the autopsy. Even the Parkland
doctors, in their press conference afterward, conjectured the bullet
might have struck JFK in the throat, struck the spine, and exited the
head. They said they had no way of knowing.
http://www.amazon.com/forum/history/ref=cm_cd_et_md_pl?_encoding=UTF8&cdForum=Fx33HXI3XVZDC8G&cdMsgID=Mx1RQ1DFW21J71Q&cdMsgNo=346&cdPage=14&cdSort=oldest&cdThread=Tx1UOFP7W4CBPU#Mx1RQ1DFW21J71Q
************************************************
Now, here's the proof that I was telling the truth above, and YOU'RE
LYING:
************************************************
They likewise conjectured that a portion of the bullet or a fragment
of bone might have exited the throat from the head shot from behind
(THROAT EXIT).
YOU'RE LYING AGAIN, HENRY!!! NO SUCH STATEMENT WAS MADE AT THE PRESS CONFERENCE.
No, you don't know that. You have a link to a purported transcript.
You don't know that it's all-inclusive. It's totally unofficial. Not a certified copy.Maybe it's an altered copy. :)
http://www.amazon.com/forum/history/ref=cm_cd_et_md_pl?_encoding=UTF8&cdForum=Fx33HXI3XVZDC8G&cdMsgID=Mx1K73ZBA2EVN8B&cdMsgNo=599&cdPage=24&cdSort=oldest&cdThread=Tx1UOFP7W4CBPU#Mx1K73ZBA2EVN8B
************************************************
Now tell us Henry - I stated that you'd made the claim that the
Parkland Press Conference transcript was an "altered document" - and
here you are ... saying that it's an "altered copy".
Lied, didn't you?
http://www.amazon.com/forum/history/ref=cm_cd_et_md_pl?_encoding=UTF8&cdForum=Fx33HXI3XVZDC8G&cdMsgID=Mx44VJMOMFZUCZ&cdMsgNo=2368&cdPage=95&cdSort=oldest&cdThread=Tx3RBPBW06TTNJX#Mx44VJMOMFZUCZ
(The links no longer work, but they worked when originally posted, and
I left them in as proof that these were originally working links to
Huckster's statements)
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)