\Jere's a repost of me schooling the anonmous "Dale" in the former
Amazon forums:

20 Forensic experts (Independent experts) agree with Kevin and disagree with Ben.

Not a SINGLE ONE of those 20 anonymous "Forensic experts" would
disagree that the Autopsy did not dissect, and DID NOT KNOW about the
bullet wound in JFK's throat.

Not a SINGLE ONE of those 20 anonymous "Forensic experts" would
disagree that the bullet wound *LOOKED* like an entry.

Not a SINGLE ONE of those 20 anonymous "Forensic experts" would
disagree that the prosectors were ORDERED not to dissect the track of
the bullet.

Not a SINGLE ONE of those 20 anonymous "Forensic experts" even knew
that the HSCA had intentionally lied about the testimony of the
Bethesda witnesses - indeed, THEY NEVER HEARD THAT TESTIMONY. The HSCA
kept the very evidence needed by the "experts" to make an honest
appraisal.

Not a SINGLE ONE of those 20 anonymous "Forensic experts" would
disagree that the Parkland staff *CHANGED* their "opinion" *AFTER*
that weekend...

Not a SINGLE ONE of those 20 anonymous "Forensic experts" would
disagree that the *ONLY* medically trained personnel to examine,
however briefly, the bullet wound in JFK's throat were at Parkland.

Not a SINGLE ONE of those 20 anonymous "Forensic experts" would
disagree that "ragged" holds no place in the description of the
original bullet wound in the skin of JFK's throat.

Not a SINGLE ONE of those 20 anonymous "Forensic experts" would
disagree that they've never seen the photograph showing bruising of
the apical portion of the lung.

Not a SINGLE ONE of those 20 anonymous "Forensic experts" would
disagree that the executive session of the Warren Commission on Jan.
27 mentioned an autopsy report in which the throat wound was described
as being caused by a fragment of bone.

You can't cite even *ONE* of these anonymous "experts" contradicting
anything I've stated in this post - nor will you even try.

Such AMAZING cowardice!

So the question remains... just what would these anonymous "experts"
agree with Kevin on? Or disagree with me on?

Can you show that they knew what I know, and *THEN* cite their
"expert" opinion?

Only a colossal jewel of ignorance would place more veracity and
credibility on emergency room doctors than these experts."

Oh, I don't think most people would accept your proposal that
anonymous so called "experts" know better than the first hand
eyewitnesses insofar as what those witnesses saw and heard.

They are *FORCED* to rely on those very people.

It takes abject stupidity for me to state such things in a public
forum.

Indeed it does... as this schooling of your nonsense illustrates.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)