On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 12:03:14 -0800 (PST), JE Corbett
<
jecorbett4@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, December 4, 2023 at 2:30:39?PM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Monday, December 4, 2023 at 1:08:09?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
No need to ask any - he'll run from ANY question I ask.
EVERY
SINGLE
TIME!
And this fact tells the tale to any thoughtful person.
Corbutt had nothing to say... He couldn't deny it.
After he claimed that the Chain of Custody form was not necessary because the case never went to trial, I asked Corbett to take us through the procedure for implementing it.
Who initiates it and when and where is it initiated ?
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/xuu8wrVmbXI/m/0fTS6m41BAAJ >>
He ran.
The chain of custody issue has been addressed by me and others ad nauseum. Your question is a red herring.
Then simply cite it.
But you can't... you're lying again.
After he said Jack Ruby accessed the police basement via the ramp, I asked him to name someone who saw Ruby come down the ramp.
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/67nmAZta-YE/m/HDxCPyojAAAJ >>
He ran.
And ran again... I deleted the logical fallacy.
After he said that Oswald pulled a gun in the Texas Theater, I asked him who, besides the police, saw Oswald pull that gun ?
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/67nmAZta-YE/m/YyR3qPMGAAAJ >>
He ran.
You are lying, Gil. I responded to this. Why do you have to tell so many lies?
Then simply quote or cite your answer.
But you can't.
After he claimed that the police had enough evidence on Oswald to charge him later that evening, I asked him to list the evidence the Dallas Police had on Oswald at 1:35am Saturday, when they arraigned him.
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/67nmAZta-YE/m/oUjJvWsbAAAJ >>
He ran.
You lie. I addressed it.
Then simply quote or cite your answer.
But you can't.
The autopsy report that describes, "a large irregular defect" that extends, "somewhat into the temporal and occipital regions". ( 16 H 980 )
I asked him, where the "occipital region" of the skull is located.
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/p8n118rKiNM/m/JjLumABRAQAJ >>
He ran.
I don't recall that specific question ...
I've asked it as well. I've SPECIFICALLY asked what part of the
occipital is *NOT* located in the back of the head.
Corbutt ran.
I asked him where is the "large irregular defect" in that occipital region depicted in this autopsy photo ?
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/BE4_HI.jpg
He ran.
You lie. Asked and answered.
Then simply quote or cite your answer.
But you can't.
I asked him to name one person who saw the throat wound BEFORE the tracheostomy was done and described it conclusively as an exit wound.
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/p8n118rKiNM/m/ytp99ZT4AAAJ >>
He ran.
You lie. Asked and answered.
Then simply quote or cite your answer.
But you can't.
I asked him to tell us why the Dallas doctors were not qualified to identify an entrance wound.
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/p8n118rKiNM/m/ytp99ZT4AAAJ. >>
He ran.
You really are fully of shit. I have explained to you on numerous occasions why that is true. How many examples of that
would you like me to jam up your nose.
Then simply quote or cite your answer.
But you can't.
I asked him to show us the "bone flap" hanging down over the ear in the autopsy photo.
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/p8n118rKiNM/m/1TmelDFTAQAJ >>
He ran.
You lie. I addressed it.
Then simply quote or cite your answer.
But you can't.
The Zapruder film shows the top front of the President's head gone and the rear intact.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/head-337.png
It shows no such thing...
You're lying again...
Which is not supported by the autopsy photos.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/montage-head.jpg
There is nothing inconsistent between the Z-film and the autopsy evidence.
ROTFLMAO!!!
I asked him if we are to believe Zapruder film or the photos and the autopsy report ?
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/p8n118rKiNM/m/cg2UdJxgAQAJ >>
He ran.
You're lying. I answered that.
Then simply quote or cite your answer.
But you can't.
This son-of-a-bitch gets angry when I don't answer his questions.
But there's NFW I'm going to answer his questions when he doesn't answer mine.
I don't answer because I'm a coward and have no answers.
Yep. I agree.
That's just the way it is. I treat people the way they treat me.
I get no respect because I deserve no respect. I'm both a liar and a coward. Nobody respects that.
Yep. I agree.
So I guess he'll just have to keep calling me names like a silly little 10 year old.
The more shit he delivers, the more the world sees what an asshole he really is.
Logical fallacy deleted.
Anyone notice that Corbutt simply ran from the questions... again?
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
