On Friday, December 1, 2023 at 12:31:09?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Fri, 1 Dec 2023 09:30:04 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Friday, December 1, 2023 at 11:55:22?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
Can you cite for your claim that the prosector dissected JFK's throat
wound?
Already have, troll.
What did I say, folks? Watch Chickenshit run!
Troll response.
On Friday, December 1, 2023 at 11:55:22?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
Can you cite for your claim that the prosector dissected JFK's throat
wound?
Already have, troll.
On Friday, December 1, 2023 at 1:09:30?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Fri, 1 Dec 2023 09:56:25 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Friday, December 1, 2023 at 12:31:09?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:Pointing out that you ran isn't a "troll response" - that's merely a
On Fri, 1 Dec 2023 09:30:04 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Friday, December 1, 2023 at 11:55:22?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
Can you cite for your claim that the prosector dissected JFK's throat >>>>>> wound?
Already have, troll.
What did I say, folks? Watch Chickenshit run!
Troll response.
logical fallacy by you.
And AGAIN you've refused to cite any evidence that the prosectors
dissected the wound. Huckster has already stated that they did *NOT*
dissect the throat wound.
Is Huckster Sienzant a liar?
Can you cite for your claim that the prosector dissected JFK's throat
wound?
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 297 |
Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
Uptime: | 128:15:34 |
Calls: | 6,663 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 12,212 |
Messages: | 5,335,189 |