On Fri, 1 Dec 2023 07:07:07 -0800 (PST), JE Corbett
<
jecorbett4@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, December 1, 2023 at 7:54:08?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Friday, December 1, 2023 at 6:39:45?AM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:
I've made a handful of posts ABOUT Yellowpanties in roughly the last 6 months. In that same time he has replied to
hundreds of my posts in a futile attempt to goad me into responding to him. I haven't replied a single time to him. The obsession is all his. It drives him up a wall that I won't reply to his trolling.
How do you when he's not posting if you're not looking for his posts ?
How do you know he's responded to "hundreds" of your posts if you're not looking for his posts ?
It's quite easy to skim through his posts without actually reading them. All I have to do is look at the top line to know who he
is responding too. Sometimes I do read one just for the amusement. He seems desperate to get me to respond to him. I think
it would make his year if he could. I will continue to occasionally post about Yellowpanties, but they'll be building snowmen in
hell before I respond to him.
Corbutt seems to think that it's an honor when he replies to you.
The obsession is all yours, and you do the same thing to me.
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/BI_ZOaLh-30/m/29tla-YeCQAJ >>
My God, you lie about everything.
I respond to you for amusement only.
Believers have constantly shown that they take joy in the death of
JFK.
Taking a shot at your lame posts amounts to target practice. You really do tee it up for us.
If this were actually true, you wouldn't be forced to run away when
Gil sticks the evidence you deny in your face.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)