JFK has now been dead 14 years more than he was alive. As expected, a few cable channels ran programs regarding the assassination which were much less than they ran for the 50th anniversary which in turn were much less than
what was run for the 40th anniversary. Interest in the subject continues to wane just as it has for the German's attack on Pearl Harbor. 99+% of the population just doesn't give a shit about it any more. It's ancient history. Almost nobody talks about it. Politicians aren't making an issue of it. The news media has all but forgotten it. Only a few small niche groups of assassination buffs continue to argue about it. For the rest of the country, it just doesn't matter anymore. The general public doesn't give a shit what we
say in this group and the few other forums dedicated to the JFK assassination.
On Monday, November 27, 2023 at 10:29:47 PM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:
JFK has now been dead 14 years more than he was alive. As expected, a few cable channels ran programs regarding the assassination which were much less than they ran for the 50th anniversary which in turn were much less thanAnother of your lies.
what was run for the 40th anniversary. Interest in the subject continues to
wane just as it has for the German's attack on Pearl Harbor. 99+% of the population just doesn't give a shit about it any more. It's ancient history.
Almost nobody talks about it. Politicians aren't making an issue of it. The
news media has all but forgotten it. Only a few small niche groups of assassination buffs continue to argue about it. For the rest of the country,
it just doesn't matter anymore. The general public doesn't give a shit what we
say in this group and the few other forums dedicated to the JFK assassination.
No interest in the subject ?
If that's true, then why are you here ?
Your presence here and those of your fellow trolls is proof that that's a lie.
You're willing to waste your life coming in here arguing every day with people you don't even know about a case ( according to you people ) that was closed 60 years ago.
Do athletes continue to play the game after the clock runs out and the game is over ?
Do lawyers continue to debate a case after the jury has rendered its verdict ?
Why would anyone continue to debate a case that has been closed ?
Does that make any sense ?
What the hell do you hope to accomplish by doing that ?
You people have offered NOTHING new in the form of evidence in 60 years.
You just keep running around in circles, chasing your tails and repeating the nonsense of the Warren Commission.
And when the inconsistencies in the evidence are pointed out to you, you try to explain them away by making excuses.
When I present official records questioning Oswald's guilt, you claim I'm looking at "the wrong things incorrectly".
ROFLMAO
Why on earth should you or anyone else care about what I, Ben, Dave Healy, Greg Parker, No Flags, or anyone else thinks about what happened to President Kennedy ?
No, I can tell you from EXPERIENCE that there's PLENTY of interest in this case. Not to brag but instead to make my point, this year alone I've done four webcast appearances "back by popular demand".
You'd prefer all of us to think that nobody cares so we could pack up and quit posting.
But that's not the truth and that's not going to happen.
So you just keep telling the world that there's no interest in the case
while at the same time acting like there is.
You've been proven to be a liar
in the past and this is just par for the course with you.
Actions speak louder than words and your actions prove that your words are lies.
You're not fooling anybody.
On Tuesday, November 28, 2023 at 5:07:02?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Monday, November 27, 2023 at 10:29:47?PM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:
JFK has now been dead 14 years more than he was alive. As expected, a few >> > cable channels ran programs regarding the assassination which were much less than they ran for the 50th anniversary which in turn were much less thanAnother of your lies.
what was run for the 40th anniversary. Interest in the subject continues to
wane just as it has for the German's attack on Pearl Harbor. 99+% of the >> > population just doesn't give a shit about it any more. It's ancient history.
Almost nobody talks about it. Politicians aren't making an issue of it. The
news media has all but forgotten it. Only a few small niche groups of
assassination buffs continue to argue about it. For the rest of the country,
it just doesn't matter anymore. The general public doesn't give a shit what we
say in this group and the few other forums dedicated to the JFK assassination.
No interest in the subject ?
If that's true, then why are you here ?
For amusement only.
I have no illusions that anything written here by anybody is going
to move the needle of public opinion.
Your presence here and those of your fellow trolls is proof that that's a lie.
Your statement is based on your lie that I said there was no interest in the subject.
You're willing to waste your life coming in here arguing every day with people you don't even know about a case ( according to you people ) that was closed 60 years ago.
The case was closed 59 years ago with the publication of the WCR which remains the definitive explanation of the
assassination.
The HSCA reopened the investigation and got a lot wrong
Do athletes continue to play the game after the clock runs out and the game is over ?
Do lawyers continue to debate a case after the jury has rendered its verdict ?
Actually, yes. It's called the appeals process.
Why would anyone continue to debate a case that has been closed ?
Does that make any sense ?
Probably not...
What the hell do you hope to accomplish by doing that ?
I'm not here to accomplish anything.
You people have offered NOTHING new in the form of evidence in 60 years.
You just keep running around in circles, chasing your tails and repeating the nonsense of the Warren Commission.The excuses all come from your side.
And when the inconsistencies in the evidence are pointed out to you, you try to explain them away by making excuses.
When I present official records questioning Oswald's guilt, you claim I'm looking at "the wrong things incorrectly".
ROFLMAO
Why on earth should you or anyone else care about what I, Ben, Dave Healy, Greg Parker, No Flags, or anyone else thinks about what happened to President Kennedy ?
Good question. The answer is we don't. We are amused by your feeble efforts.
Now for my question.
No, I can tell you from EXPERIENCE that there's PLENTY of interest in this case. Not to brag but instead to make my point, this year alone I've done four webcast appearances "back by popular demand".
You'd prefer all of us to think that nobody cares so we could pack up and quit posting.
Once again you resort to lying about my position.
But that's not the truth and that's not going to happen.
So you just keep telling the world that there's no interest in the case
You keep lying about what wrote.
while at the same time acting like there is.
You've been proven to be a liar
in the past and this is just par for the course with you.
Actions speak louder than words and your actions prove that your words are lies.
You're not fooling anybody.
JFK has now been dead 14 years more than he was alive. As expected...
JFK has now been dead 14 years more than he was alive. As expected, a few cable channels ran programs regarding the assassination which were much less than they ran for the 50th anniversary which in turn were much less than
what was run for the 40th anniversary. Interest in the subject continues to wane just as it has for the German's attack on Pearl Harbor.
population just doesn't give a shit about it any more. It's ancient history. Almost nobody talks about it. Politicians aren't making an issue of it. The news media has all but forgotten it. Only a few small niche groups of assassination buffs continue to argue about it. For the rest of the country, it just doesn't matter anymore. The general public doesn't give a shit what we
say in this group and the few other forums dedicated to the JFK assassination.
On Monday, November 27, 2023 at 7:29:47 PM UTC-8, JE Corbett wrote:Haha! Sometimes it pays to actually read what Corbett writes!
JFK has now been dead 14 years more than he was alive. As expected, a few cable channels ran programs regarding the assassination which were much less than they ran for the 50th anniversary which in turn were much less thanI guess I missed this bit of history.
what was run for the 40th anniversary. Interest in the subject continues to
wane just as it has for the German's attack on Pearl Harbor.
99+% of the
population just doesn't give a shit about it any more. It's ancient history.
Almost nobody talks about it. Politicians aren't making an issue of it. The
news media has all but forgotten it. Only a few small niche groups of assassination buffs continue to argue about it. For the rest of the country,
it just doesn't matter anymore. The general public doesn't give a shit what we
say in this group and the few other forums dedicated to the JFK assassination.
On Tuesday, November 28, 2023 at 5:07:02 AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Monday, November 27, 2023 at 10:29:47 PM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:Another of your lies. I didn't say there was no interest in the subject. I said interest was waning. Why do you have to lie to
JFK has now been dead 14 years more than he was alive. As expected, a fewAnother of your lies.
cable channels ran programs regarding the assassination which were much less than they ran for the 50th anniversary which in turn were much less than
what was run for the 40th anniversary. Interest in the subject continues to
wane just as it has for the German's attack on Pearl Harbor. 99+% of the population just doesn't give a shit about it any more. It's ancient history.
Almost nobody talks about it. Politicians aren't making an issue of it. The
news media has all but forgotten it. Only a few small niche groups of assassination buffs continue to argue about it. For the rest of the country,
it just doesn't matter anymore. The general public doesn't give a shit what we
say in this group and the few other forums dedicated to the JFK assassination.
No interest in the subject ?
make your point.
If that's true, then why are you here ?For amusement only. I have no illusions that anything written here by anybody is going to move the needle of public opinion.
Your presence here and those of your fellow trolls is proof that that's a lie.Your statement is based on your lie that I said there was no interest in the subject. What the hell did you think I meant when
I wrote:
" Only a few small niche groups of assassination buffs continue to argue about it."?
Everyone who contributes to this forum, outside of the spammers, ia part of the niche groups of which I spoke.
You're willing to waste your life coming in here arguing every day with people you don't even know about a case ( according to you people ) that was closed 60 years ago.The case was closed 59 years ago with the publication of the WCR which remains the definitive explanation of the
assassination. The HSCA reopened the investigation and got a lot wrong although they did correctly ID Oswald as the
assassin. Ever since then bozos like you have been trying exonerate that little piece of shit without success.
Do athletes continue to play the game after the clock runs out and the game is over ?Who said this was a game. It's a clown show. The LNs just keep pointing that out to the clowns.
Do lawyers continue to debate a case after the jury has rendered its verdict ?Actually, yes. It's called the appeals process.
Why would anyone continue to debate a case that has been closed ?To point out the futility of the clowns.
Does that make any sense ?Probably not but who says amusement has to make sense.
What the hell do you hope to accomplish by doing that ?I'm not here to accomplish anything. I don't expect to change the minds of the clowns and I don't have any reason to believe
there are undecided lurkers out there. However, I did play a part in changing the mind of Dr. Bob Artwohl about 30 years
ago on the old Prodigy board. He came to that group a CT and left an LN and pointed to some of my arguments that had
changed his mind.
I'm sure other LNs influenced him as well. He later became a contributor on the McAdams board but that
was before I got involved back in 2008. I don't know if he ever posted on this one.
You people have offered NOTHING new in the form of evidence in 60 years.We already have the hay in the barn. There have been technology advancements which have served to confirm the findings
of the WC which used what they had available at the time. We have been able to reduce the window of when the single
bullet struck to a few frames from the 210-225 window the WC concluded.
You just keep running around in circles, chasing your tails and repeating the nonsense of the Warren Commission.Actually, were's sitting in our easy chairs watching the clowns spin their wheels.
And when the inconsistencies in the evidence are pointed out to you, you try to explain them away by making excuses.
When I present official records questioning Oswald's guilt, you claim I'm looking at "the wrong things incorrectly".
The excuses all come from your side. The evidence all point to Oswald so your entire case is based on coming up with
excuses to dismiss the evidence.
ROFLMAO
Why on earth should you or anyone else care about what I, Ben, Dave Healy, Greg Parker, No Flags, or anyone else thinks about what happened to President Kennedy ?Good question. The answer is we don't. We are amused by your feeble efforts.
Now for my question. Just what have you accomplished over the past several decades and what is it you hope to accomplish
in the future? What is your endgame?
No, I can tell you from EXPERIENCE that there's PLENTY of interest in this case. Not to brag but instead to make my point, this year alone I've done four webcast appearances "back by popular demand".Just how many viewers do you think you drew and what reason do you have to believe any of them were not already part of
the niche interest group of which I wrote earlier.
You'd prefer all of us to think that nobody cares so we could pack up and quit posting.Once again you resort to lying about my position. I have said interest in the subject is limited to a very small niche group. If
you believe otherwise, you are only fooling yourself. What percentage of the American people do you think even know this
group exists. I would wager that the actual percentage would have a lot of zeros to the right of the decimal point.
But that's not the truth and that's not going to happen.I know that's not going to happen. That's what makes it so funny, seeing a bunch of clowns kicking a dead horse. The hobby
will die when the clowns have all joined folks like Mark Lane, Harold Weisberg, Jim Marrs, Tom Rossley, etc. who all went to
their graves without ever being able to prove the unproveable, that someone other than Oswald took part in the assassination
of JFK. Nothing you have done in the past and nothing you will ever do is going to rewrite history. I think you realize that, even
if you won't admit it to yourself. You will continue to tilt at windmills until you are no longer able to tilt.
So you just keep telling the world that there's no interest in the caseYou keep lying about what wrote.
while at the same time acting like there is.Should we count how many times you have repeated the same lie in just this one post?
You've been proven to be a liar
in the past and this is just par for the course with you.Tell us how the actions of one man prove there is widespread interest in the JFK assassination.
Actions speak louder than words and your actions prove that your words are lies.
You're not fooling anybody.
On Tuesday, November 28, 2023 at 7:44:18 AM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:
On Tuesday, November 28, 2023 at 5:07:02 AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Monday, November 27, 2023 at 10:29:47 PM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:Another of your lies. I didn't say there was no interest in the subject. I said interest was waning. Why do you have to lie to
JFK has now been dead 14 years more than he was alive. As expected, a fewAnother of your lies.
cable channels ran programs regarding the assassination which were much less than they ran for the 50th anniversary which in turn were much less than
what was run for the 40th anniversary. Interest in the subject continues to
wane just as it has for the German's attack on Pearl Harbor. 99+% of the
population just doesn't give a shit about it any more. It's ancient history.
Almost nobody talks about it. Politicians aren't making an issue of it. The
news media has all but forgotten it. Only a few small niche groups of assassination buffs continue to argue about it. For the rest of the country,
it just doesn't matter anymore. The general public doesn't give a shit what we
say in this group and the few other forums dedicated to the JFK assassination.
No interest in the subject ?
make your point.
If that's true, then why are you here ?For amusement only. I have no illusions that anything written here by anybody is going to move the needle of public opinion.
Your presence here and those of your fellow trolls is proof that that's a lie.Your statement is based on your lie that I said there was no interest in the subject. What the hell did you think I meant when
I wrote:
" Only a few small niche groups of assassination buffs continue to argue about it."?
Everyone who contributes to this forum, outside of the spammers, ia part of the niche groups of which I spoke.
I arrived after you did and I recall a conspiracy theorist accused Bob of using an acronym backwards as his last name.You're willing to waste your life coming in here arguing every day with people you don't even know about a case ( according to you people ) that was closed 60 years ago.The case was closed 59 years ago with the publication of the WCR which remains the definitive explanation of the
assassination. The HSCA reopened the investigation and got a lot wrong although they did correctly ID Oswald as the
assassin. Ever since then bozos like you have been trying exonerate that little piece of shit without success.
Do athletes continue to play the game after the clock runs out and the game is over ?Who said this was a game. It's a clown show. The LNs just keep pointing that out to the clowns.
Do lawyers continue to debate a case after the jury has rendered its verdict ?Actually, yes. It's called the appeals process.
Why would anyone continue to debate a case that has been closed ?To point out the futility of the clowns.
Does that make any sense ?Probably not but who says amusement has to make sense.
What the hell do you hope to accomplish by doing that ?I'm not here to accomplish anything. I don't expect to change the minds of the clowns and I don't have any reason to believe
there are undecided lurkers out there. However, I did play a part in changing the mind of Dr. Bob Artwohl about 30 years
ago on the old Prodigy board. He came to that group a CT and left an LN and pointed to some of my arguments that had
changed his mind.
That particular CT said Artwohl stood for Lee Harvey Oswald Was The Real Assassin.
Hey, who needs evidence when you can just make up stuff (the motto of CTs everywhere).
I'm sure other LNs influenced him as well. He later became a contributor on the McAdams board but thatAt the time, Bob was an emergency room physician in Baltimore, MD, so no doubt he saw his share of bullet wounds. Last I looked, he was in private practice so where in Alaska.
was before I got involved back in 2008. I don't know if he ever posted on this one.
At the time, Bob was an emergency room physician in Baltimore, MD, so no doubt he saw his share of bullet wounds. Last I looked, he was in private practice so where in Alaska.
On Tuesday, November 28, 2023 at 7:44:18 AM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:
On Tuesday, November 28, 2023 at 5:07:02 AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Monday, November 27, 2023 at 10:29:47 PM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:Another of your lies. I didn't say there was no interest in the subject. I said interest was waning. Why do you have to lie to
JFK has now been dead 14 years more than he was alive. As expected, a fewAnother of your lies.
cable channels ran programs regarding the assassination which were much less than they ran for the 50th anniversary which in turn were much less than
what was run for the 40th anniversary. Interest in the subject continues to
wane just as it has for the German's attack on Pearl Harbor. 99+% of the
population just doesn't give a shit about it any more. It's ancient history.
Almost nobody talks about it. Politicians aren't making an issue of it. The
news media has all but forgotten it. Only a few small niche groups of assassination buffs continue to argue about it. For the rest of the country,
it just doesn't matter anymore. The general public doesn't give a shit what we
say in this group and the few other forums dedicated to the JFK assassination.
No interest in the subject ?
make your point.
If that's true, then why are you here ?For amusement only. I have no illusions that anything written here by anybody is going to move the needle of public opinion.
Your presence here and those of your fellow trolls is proof that that's a lie.Your statement is based on your lie that I said there was no interest in the subject. What the hell did you think I meant when
I wrote:
" Only a few small niche groups of assassination buffs continue to argue about it."?
Everyone who contributes to this forum, outside of the spammers, ia part of the niche groups of which I spoke.
I arrived after you did and I recall a conspiracy theorist accused Bob of using an acronym backwards as his last name.You're willing to waste your life coming in here arguing every day with people you don't even know about a case ( according to you people ) that was closed 60 years ago.The case was closed 59 years ago with the publication of the WCR which remains the definitive explanation of the
assassination. The HSCA reopened the investigation and got a lot wrong although they did correctly ID Oswald as the
assassin. Ever since then bozos like you have been trying exonerate that little piece of shit without success.
Do athletes continue to play the game after the clock runs out and the game is over ?Who said this was a game. It's a clown show. The LNs just keep pointing that out to the clowns.
Do lawyers continue to debate a case after the jury has rendered its verdict ?Actually, yes. It's called the appeals process.
Why would anyone continue to debate a case that has been closed ?To point out the futility of the clowns.
Does that make any sense ?Probably not but who says amusement has to make sense.
What the hell do you hope to accomplish by doing that ?I'm not here to accomplish anything. I don't expect to change the minds of the clowns and I don't have any reason to believe
there are undecided lurkers out there. However, I did play a part in changing the mind of Dr. Bob Artwohl about 30 years
ago on the old Prodigy board. He came to that group a CT and left an LN and pointed to some of my arguments that had
changed his mind.
That particular CT said Artwohl stood for Lee Harvey Oswald Was The Real Assassin.
Hey, who needs evidence when you can just make up stuff (the motto of CTs everywhere).
I'm sure other LNs influenced him as well. He later became a contributor on the McAdams board but thatAt the time, Bob was an emergency room physician in Baltimore, MD, so no doubt he saw his share of bullet wounds. Last I looked, he was in private practice so where in Alaska.
was before I got involved back in 2008. I don't know if he ever posted on this one.
On Tuesday, November 28, 2023 at 11:31:24 PM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote:
On Tuesday, November 28, 2023 at 7:44:18 AM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:
On Tuesday, November 28, 2023 at 5:07:02 AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Monday, November 27, 2023 at 10:29:47 PM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:Another of your lies. I didn't say there was no interest in the subject. I said interest was waning. Why do you have to lie to
JFK has now been dead 14 years more than he was alive. As expected, a fewAnother of your lies.
cable channels ran programs regarding the assassination which were much less than they ran for the 50th anniversary which in turn were much less than
what was run for the 40th anniversary. Interest in the subject continues to
wane just as it has for the German's attack on Pearl Harbor. 99+% of the
population just doesn't give a shit about it any more. It's ancient history.
Almost nobody talks about it. Politicians aren't making an issue of it. The
news media has all but forgotten it. Only a few small niche groups of
assassination buffs continue to argue about it. For the rest of the country,
it just doesn't matter anymore. The general public doesn't give a shit what we
say in this group and the few other forums dedicated to the JFK assassination.
No interest in the subject ?
make your point.
If that's true, then why are you here ?For amusement only. I have no illusions that anything written here by anybody is going to move the needle of public opinion.
Your presence here and those of your fellow trolls is proof that that's a lie.Your statement is based on your lie that I said there was no interest in the subject. What the hell did you think I meant when
I wrote:
" Only a few small niche groups of assassination buffs continue to argue about it."?
Everyone who contributes to this forum, outside of the spammers, ia part of the niche groups of which I spoke.
I arrived after you did and I recall a conspiracy theorist accused Bob of using an acronym backwards as his last name.You're willing to waste your life coming in here arguing every day with people you don't even know about a case ( according to you people ) that was closed 60 years ago.The case was closed 59 years ago with the publication of the WCR which remains the definitive explanation of the
assassination. The HSCA reopened the investigation and got a lot wrong although they did correctly ID Oswald as the
assassin. Ever since then bozos like you have been trying exonerate that little piece of shit without success.
Do athletes continue to play the game after the clock runs out and the game is over ?Who said this was a game. It's a clown show. The LNs just keep pointing that out to the clowns.
Do lawyers continue to debate a case after the jury has rendered its verdict ?Actually, yes. It's called the appeals process.
Why would anyone continue to debate a case that has been closed ?To point out the futility of the clowns.
Does that make any sense ?Probably not but who says amusement has to make sense.
What the hell do you hope to accomplish by doing that ?I'm not here to accomplish anything. I don't expect to change the minds of the clowns and I don't have any reason to believe
there are undecided lurkers out there. However, I did play a part in changing the mind of Dr. Bob Artwohl about 30 years
ago on the old Prodigy board. He came to that group a CT and left an LN and pointed to some of my arguments that had
changed his mind.
That particular CT said Artwohl stood for Lee Harvey Oswald Was The Real Assassin.
Hey, who needs evidence when you can just make up stuff (the motto of CTs everywhere).Here Nutter Loon Hank Sienzant cites "Bob" as a probable bullet wound expert because he thinks "Bob" worked in an emergency room.
I'm sure other LNs influenced him as well. He later became a contributor on the McAdams board but thatAt the time, Bob was an emergency room physician in Baltimore, MD, so no doubt he saw his share of bullet wounds. Last I looked, he was in private practice somewhere in Alaska.
was before I got involved back in 2008. I don't know if he ever posted on this one.
And because "Bob" is a Nutter Loon, no doubt his primary qualification.
Nutters really are insane. That's why they are called Nutters!
On Tuesday, November 28, 2023 at 11:31:24 PM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote:called Nutters!
On Tuesday, November 28, 2023 at 7:44:18 AM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:
On Tuesday, November 28, 2023 at 5:07:02 AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Monday, November 27, 2023 at 10:29:47 PM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:Another of your lies. I didn't say there was no interest in the subject. I said interest was waning. Why do you have to lie to
JFK has now been dead 14 years more than he was alive. As expected, a fewAnother of your lies.
cable channels ran programs regarding the assassination which were much less than they ran for the 50th anniversary which in turn were much less than
what was run for the 40th anniversary. Interest in the subject continues to
wane just as it has for the German's attack on Pearl Harbor. 99+% of the
population just doesn't give a shit about it any more. It's ancient history.
Almost nobody talks about it. Politicians aren't making an issue of it. The
news media has all but forgotten it. Only a few small niche groups of
assassination buffs continue to argue about it. For the rest of the country,
it just doesn't matter anymore. The general public doesn't give a shit what we
say in this group and the few other forums dedicated to the JFK assassination.
No interest in the subject ?
make your point.
If that's true, then why are you here ?For amusement only. I have no illusions that anything written here by anybody is going to move the needle of public opinion.
Your presence here and those of your fellow trolls is proof that that's a lie.Your statement is based on your lie that I said there was no interest in the subject. What the hell did you think I meant when
I wrote:
" Only a few small niche groups of assassination buffs continue to argue about it."?
Everyone who contributes to this forum, outside of the spammers, ia part of the niche groups of which I spoke.
I arrived after you did and I recall a conspiracy theorist accused Bob of using an acronym backwards as his last name.You're willing to waste your life coming in here arguing every day with people you don't even know about a case ( according to you people ) that was closed 60 years ago.The case was closed 59 years ago with the publication of the WCR which remains the definitive explanation of the
assassination. The HSCA reopened the investigation and got a lot wrong although they did correctly ID Oswald as the
assassin. Ever since then bozos like you have been trying exonerate that little piece of shit without success.
Do athletes continue to play the game after the clock runs out and the game is over ?Who said this was a game. It's a clown show. The LNs just keep pointing that out to the clowns.
Do lawyers continue to debate a case after the jury has rendered its verdict ?Actually, yes. It's called the appeals process.
Why would anyone continue to debate a case that has been closed ?To point out the futility of the clowns.
Does that make any sense ?Probably not but who says amusement has to make sense.
What the hell do you hope to accomplish by doing that ?I'm not here to accomplish anything. I don't expect to change the minds of the clowns and I don't have any reason to believe
there are undecided lurkers out there. However, I did play a part in changing the mind of Dr. Bob Artwohl about 30 years
ago on the old Prodigy board. He came to that group a CT and left an LN and pointed to some of my arguments that had
changed his mind.
That particular CT said Artwohl stood for Lee Harvey Oswald Was The Real Assassin.
Hey, who needs evidence when you can just make up stuff (the motto of CTs everywhere).Here Nutter Loon Hank Sienzant cites "Bob" as a probable bullet wound expert because he thinks "Bob" worked in an emergency room. And because "Bob" is a Nutter Loon, no doubt his primary qualification. Nutters really are insane. That's why they are
I'm sure other LNs influenced him as well. He later became a contributor on the McAdams board but thatAt the time, Bob was an emergency room physician in Baltimore, MD, so no doubt he saw his share of bullet wounds. Last I looked, he was in private practice so where in Alaska.
was before I got involved back in 2008. I don't know if he ever posted on this one.
On Wednesday, November 29, 2023 at 2:21:51 AM UTC-5, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:called Nutters!
On Tuesday, November 28, 2023 at 11:31:24 PM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote:
On Tuesday, November 28, 2023 at 7:44:18 AM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:
On Tuesday, November 28, 2023 at 5:07:02 AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Monday, November 27, 2023 at 10:29:47 PM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:Another of your lies. I didn't say there was no interest in the subject. I said interest was waning. Why do you have to lie to
JFK has now been dead 14 years more than he was alive. As expected, a fewAnother of your lies.
cable channels ran programs regarding the assassination which were much less than they ran for the 50th anniversary which in turn were much less than
what was run for the 40th anniversary. Interest in the subject continues to
wane just as it has for the German's attack on Pearl Harbor. 99+% of the
population just doesn't give a shit about it any more. It's ancient history.
Almost nobody talks about it. Politicians aren't making an issue of it. The
news media has all but forgotten it. Only a few small niche groups of
assassination buffs continue to argue about it. For the rest of the country,
it just doesn't matter anymore. The general public doesn't give a shit what we
say in this group and the few other forums dedicated to the JFK assassination.
No interest in the subject ?
make your point.
If that's true, then why are you here ?For amusement only. I have no illusions that anything written here by anybody is going to move the needle of public opinion.
Your presence here and those of your fellow trolls is proof that that's a lie.Your statement is based on your lie that I said there was no interest in the subject. What the hell did you think I meant when
I wrote:
" Only a few small niche groups of assassination buffs continue to argue about it."?
Everyone who contributes to this forum, outside of the spammers, ia part of the niche groups of which I spoke.
I arrived after you did and I recall a conspiracy theorist accused Bob of using an acronym backwards as his last name.You're willing to waste your life coming in here arguing every day with people you don't even know about a case ( according to you people ) that was closed 60 years ago.The case was closed 59 years ago with the publication of the WCR which remains the definitive explanation of the
assassination. The HSCA reopened the investigation and got a lot wrong although they did correctly ID Oswald as the
assassin. Ever since then bozos like you have been trying exonerate that little piece of shit without success.
Do athletes continue to play the game after the clock runs out and the game is over ?Who said this was a game. It's a clown show. The LNs just keep pointing that out to the clowns.
Do lawyers continue to debate a case after the jury has rendered its verdict ?Actually, yes. It's called the appeals process.
Why would anyone continue to debate a case that has been closed ?To point out the futility of the clowns.
Does that make any sense ?Probably not but who says amusement has to make sense.
What the hell do you hope to accomplish by doing that ?I'm not here to accomplish anything. I don't expect to change the minds of the clowns and I don't have any reason to believe
there are undecided lurkers out there. However, I did play a part in changing the mind of Dr. Bob Artwohl about 30 years
ago on the old Prodigy board. He came to that group a CT and left an LN and pointed to some of my arguments that had
changed his mind.
That particular CT said Artwohl stood for Lee Harvey Oswald Was The Real Assassin.
Hey, who needs evidence when you can just make up stuff (the motto of CTs everywhere).Here Nutter Loon Hank Sienzant cites "Bob" as a probable bullet wound expert because he thinks "Bob" worked in an emergency room. And because "Bob" is a Nutter Loon, no doubt his primary qualification. Nutters really are insane. That's why they are
I'm sure other LNs influenced him as well. He later became a contributor on the McAdams board but thatAt the time, Bob was an emergency room physician in Baltimore, MD, so no doubt he saw his share of bullet wounds. Last I looked, he was in private practice so where in Alaska.
was before I got involved back in 2008. I don't know if he ever posted on this one.
Like I said above, “who needs evidence when you can just make up stuff (the motto of CTs everywhere).”You're the only thing I've ever heard say that motto, and it suits you well. You won't even bother to go down in your basement to find some evidence.
there is no reasonable evidence of a pre-existing conspiracy.
On Wednesday, November 29, 2023 at 10:55:56 AM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote:
there is no reasonable evidence of a pre-existing conspiracy.Was there "reasonable evidence" of guilt in the 19 cases Wade got convictions on that were overturned on DNA evidence ?
https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna25917791
Was there "reasonable evidence" of guilt when Wade convinced a jury to send an innocent man to the electric chair in 1954 ?
https://www.dmagazine.com/publications/d-magazine/2016/may/henry-wade-executed-innocent-man/
"Reasonable evidence" doesn't mean shit.
As Wade's track record shows, you can have all the "reasonable evidence" of something that is not true.
Or likewise have no "reasonable evidence" of somethng that is.
Henry Wade. Now there's a horse you can hitch your wagon to.
No "reasonable evidence" of a conspiracy to you mental midgets means none existed.
Gerry Ford was stupid but even he wasn't THAT stupid. He made sure in interviews to say that the Warren Commission found no EVIDENCE of a conspiracy, not that one never existed.
It's very easy to get away with murder when your allies are in control of the evidence.
On Wednesday, November 29, 2023 at 11:51:55?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Wednesday, November 29, 2023 at 10:55:56?AM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote: >>> there is no reasonable evidence of a pre-existing conspiracy.
Was there "reasonable evidence" of guilt in the 19 cases Wade got convictions on that were overturned on DNA evidence ?
https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna25917791
The jury thought so.
Was there "reasonable evidence" of guilt when Wade convinced a jury to send an innocent man to the electric chair in 1954 ?
https://www.dmagazine.com/publications/d-magazine/2016/may/henry-wade-executed-innocent-man/
The jury thought so.
"Reasonable evidence" doesn't mean shit.
I'm not surprise a CT would think so...
As Wade's track record shows, you can have all the "reasonable evidence" of something that is not true.
Or likewise have no "reasonable evidence" of somethng that is.
Henry Wade. Now there's a horse you can hitch your wagon to.
Gladly.
No "reasonable evidence" of a conspiracy to you mental midgets means none existed.
You have provided no evidence...
Gerry Ford was stupid but even he wasn't THAT stupid. He made sure in interviews to say that the Warren Commission found no EVIDENCE of a conspiracy, not that one never existed.
It's very easy to get away with murder when your allies are in control of the evidence.
You have provided exactly zero evidence ...
Hey, who needs evidence when you can just make up stuff (the motto of CTs everywhere).
I must have missed that one. I'm sure I would have remembered something that silly.
On Tuesday, November 28, 2023 at 11:31:24 PM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote:
On Tuesday, November 28, 2023 at 7:44:18 AM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:
On Tuesday, November 28, 2023 at 5:07:02 AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Monday, November 27, 2023 at 10:29:47 PM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:Another of your lies. I didn't say there was no interest in the subject. I said interest was waning. Why do you have to lie to
JFK has now been dead 14 years more than he was alive. As expected, a fewAnother of your lies.
cable channels ran programs regarding the assassination which were much less than they ran for the 50th anniversary which in turn were much less than
what was run for the 40th anniversary. Interest in the subject continues to
wane just as it has for the German's attack on Pearl Harbor. 99+% of the
population just doesn't give a shit about it any more. It's ancient history.
Almost nobody talks about it. Politicians aren't making an issue of it. The
news media has all but forgotten it. Only a few small niche groups of
assassination buffs continue to argue about it. For the rest of the country,
it just doesn't matter anymore. The general public doesn't give a shit what we
say in this group and the few other forums dedicated to the JFK assassination.
No interest in the subject ?
make your point.
If that's true, then why are you here ?For amusement only. I have no illusions that anything written here by anybody is going to move the needle of public opinion.
Your presence here and those of your fellow trolls is proof that that's a lie.Your statement is based on your lie that I said there was no interest in the subject. What the hell did you think I meant when
I wrote:
" Only a few small niche groups of assassination buffs continue to argue about it."?
Everyone who contributes to this forum, outside of the spammers, ia part of the niche groups of which I spoke.
I arrived after you did and I recall a conspiracy theorist accused Bob of using an acronym backwards as his last name.You're willing to waste your life coming in here arguing every day with people you don't even know about a case ( according to you people ) that was closed 60 years ago.The case was closed 59 years ago with the publication of the WCR which remains the definitive explanation of the
assassination. The HSCA reopened the investigation and got a lot wrong although they did correctly ID Oswald as the
assassin. Ever since then bozos like you have been trying exonerate that little piece of shit without success.
Do athletes continue to play the game after the clock runs out and the game is over ?Who said this was a game. It's a clown show. The LNs just keep pointing that out to the clowns.
Do lawyers continue to debate a case after the jury has rendered its verdict ?Actually, yes. It's called the appeals process.
Why would anyone continue to debate a case that has been closed ?To point out the futility of the clowns.
Does that make any sense ?Probably not but who says amusement has to make sense.
What the hell do you hope to accomplish by doing that ?I'm not here to accomplish anything. I don't expect to change the minds of the clowns and I don't have any reason to believe
there are undecided lurkers out there. However, I did play a part in changing the mind of Dr. Bob Artwohl about 30 years
ago on the old Prodigy board. He came to that group a CT and left an LN and pointed to some of my arguments that had
changed his mind.
That particular CT said Artwohl stood for Lee Harvey Oswald Was The Real Assassin.
Hey, who needs evidence when you can just make up stuff (the motto of CTs everywhere).I must have missed that one. I'm sure I would have remembered something that silly. I don't know if the Dr. Robert Artwohl
in the link below is the same one we came to know, but it does show that Artwohl is a real name.
https://alaskaveinclinic.com/
OK, so it looks like the Bob Artwohl in the link I provided is that same guy. Good to know he's still doing well. I think many LNsI'm sure other LNs influenced him as well. He later became a contributor on the McAdams board but thatAt the time, Bob was an emergency room physician in Baltimore, MD, so no doubt he saw his share of bullet wounds. Last I looked, he was in private practice so where in Alaska.
was before I got involved back in 2008. I don't know if he ever posted on this one.
were at one time CTs including me.
The difference is that once we took a closer look at the evidence, we realized there was
no doubt Oswald was the assassin and no reason to believe he had accomplices.
I started with Who Killed Kennedy (Buchanan), and moved on to
Whitewash (Weisberg), Rush to Judgment (Lanr), Accessories After
the Fact (Meagher), and Six Seconds in Dallas (Thompson). They
seemed to make good points, but it wasn't until I stopped taking their
word for what the evidence shows and started to check it out for
myself that I realized his they were twisting things.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 104:51:17 |
| Calls: | 6,660 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 12,209 |
| Messages: | 5,335,309 |