1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. ALT.CONSPIRACY.JFK

  • Re: Jack Ruby Implicates LBJ While Hank Sienzant Quotes Ruby Saying The

    From Hank Sienzant@21:1/5 to NoTrueFlags Here on Fri Nov 24 22:04:02 2023
    On Saturday, November 25, 2023 at 12:58:45 AM UTC-5, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    Thus contradicting what he just said to Gil about dismissing everything a proven liar has said. Hank just loves twisting that blade in JFK's back! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4tmTGXL1qn4

    If Ruby’s a proven perjuror, I'd love to see the evidence. When do you intend to post it here?

    And if he is a proven perjuror, then Mcclung was wrong to list him as someone with “Absolute Credibility” here:
    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/_IV0UJWanws/m/Xt5zabjTEK4J

    Right?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NoTrueFlags Here@21:1/5 to Hank Sienzant on Fri Nov 24 22:05:11 2023
    On Saturday, November 25, 2023 at 1:04:04 AM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote:
    On Saturday, November 25, 2023 at 12:58:45 AM UTC-5, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    Thus contradicting what he just said to Gil about dismissing everything a proven liar has said. Hank just loves twisting that blade in JFK's back! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4tmTGXL1qn4
    If Ruby’s a proven perjuror, I'd love to see the evidence. When do you intend to post it here?

    And if he is a proven perjuror, then Mcclung was wrong to list him as someone with “Absolute Credibility” here:
    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/_IV0UJWanws/m/Xt5zabjTEK4J

    Right?
    Why do you hate JFK? Did he bang your mother?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gil Jesus@21:1/5 to Hank Sienzant on Sat Nov 25 02:48:26 2023
    On Saturday, November 25, 2023 at 1:04:04 AM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote:
    If Ruby’s a proven perjuror, I'd love to see the evidence. When do you intend to post it here?

    Here ya go:
    Jack Ruby tells reporters that if the Far Left liberal Adlai Stevenson had been Vice-President, Kennedy would never have been assassinated
    and that the reason why he was, was because the right-wing Deep State preferred Johnson.

    https://youtu.be/70kIINe4cbs

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JE Corbett@21:1/5 to Gil Jesus on Sat Nov 25 05:22:29 2023
    On Saturday, November 25, 2023 at 5:48:28 AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Saturday, November 25, 2023 at 1:04:04 AM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote:
    If Ruby’s a proven perjuror, I'd love to see the evidence. When do you intend to post it here?
    Here ya go:
    Jack Ruby tells reporters that if the Far Left liberal Adlai Stevenson had been Vice-President, Kennedy would never have been assassinated
    and that the reason why he was, was because the right-wing Deep State preferred Johnson.

    https://youtu.be/70kIINe4cbs

    You think an opinion expressed by Ruby in an unsworn statement to reporters is evidence of perjury? If I were you,
    I would contact that correspondence law school you got your legal training from and demand your money back.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gil Jesus@21:1/5 to JE Corbett on Sat Nov 25 05:30:25 2023
    On Saturday, November 25, 2023 at 8:22:31 AM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:
    On Saturday, November 25, 2023 at 1:04:04 AM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote:
    If Ruby’s a proven perjuror, I'd love to see the evidence. When do you intend to post it here?
    You think an opinion expressed by Ruby in an unsworn statement to reporters is evidence of perjury? If I were you,
    I would contact that correspondence law school you got your legal training from and demand your money back.

    You know you're responding to Hank, right ?
    Hank's the one talking about Ruby's perjury.
    I posted the video in response to the thread topic. ( Ruby implicates LBJ )

    Idiot.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JE Corbett@21:1/5 to Gil Jesus on Sat Nov 25 05:42:25 2023
    On Saturday, November 25, 2023 at 8:30:27 AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Saturday, November 25, 2023 at 8:22:31 AM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:
    On Saturday, November 25, 2023 at 1:04:04 AM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote:
    If Ruby’s a proven perjuror, I'd love to see the evidence. When do you intend to post it here?
    You think an opinion expressed by Ruby in an unsworn statement to reporters is evidence of perjury? If I were you,
    I would contact that correspondence law school you got your legal training from and demand your money back.
    You know you're responding to Hank, right ?
    Hank's the one talking about Ruby's perjury.
    I posted the video in response to the thread topic. ( Ruby implicates LBJ )

    Idiot.

    Yes, I accidentally clicked on Hank's post rather than yours. BFD.

    You posted the video in response to Hank's request for evidence that Ruby was a proven perjuror. Explain how an unsworn
    statement made by Ruby to reporters is evidence he is a proven perjuror. Or did you accidentally click on Hank's post too?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bud@21:1/5 to Gil Jesus on Sat Nov 25 05:46:38 2023
    On Saturday, November 25, 2023 at 8:30:27 AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Saturday, November 25, 2023 at 8:22:31 AM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:
    On Saturday, November 25, 2023 at 1:04:04 AM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote:
    If Ruby’s a proven perjuror, I'd love to see the evidence. When do you intend to post it here?
    You think an opinion expressed by Ruby in an unsworn statement to reporters is evidence of perjury? If I were you,
    I would contact that correspondence law school you got your legal training from and demand your money back.
    You know you're responding to Hank, right ?
    Hank's the one talking about Ruby's perjury.
    I posted the video in response to the thread topic. ( Ruby implicates LBJ )

    Do you know what the word "implicates" means? Can you show how it applies in this case?

    Idiot.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to jecorbett4@gmail.com on Tue Nov 28 09:46:28 2023
    On Sat, 25 Nov 2023 05:22:29 -0800 (PST), JE Corbett
    <jecorbett4@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Saturday, November 25, 2023 at 5:48:28?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Saturday, November 25, 2023 at 1:04:04?AM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote:
    If Rubys a proven perjuror, I'd love to see the evidence. When do you intend to post it here?
    Here ya go:
    Jack Ruby tells reporters that if the Far Left liberal Adlai Stevenson had been Vice-President, Kennedy would never have been assassinated
    and that the reason why he was, was because the right-wing Deep State preferred Johnson.

    https://youtu.be/70kIINe4cbs

    You think an opinion ...

    Only morons keep trying to label their lies "opinions."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Tue Nov 28 11:35:02 2023
    On Sat, 25 Nov 2023 05:46:38 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
    wrote:

    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Tue Nov 28 13:05:05 2023
    On Fri, 24 Nov 2023 22:04:02 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
    <hsienzant@aol.com> wrote:

    You've claimed that the "A.B.C.D." in the Autopsy Report is the
    description of the *location* of the large head wound.

    Yet you refuse time and time again from QUOTING the preceding
    paragraph that describes what this ACTUALLY is. Why is that?

    You've also claimed that the prosectors dissected the throat wound.

    Why do you continue to refuse to cite any evidence for this?

    Why have you CONSISTENTLY run away each time I raise this issue?

    Now you've quite stupidly insisted that the bullet entered JFK's back,
    and exited the back of his head.

    More cowardice, more stupidity, more dishonesty.

    Are you proud of yourself?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to jecorbett4@gmail.com on Wed Nov 29 09:53:37 2023
    On Sat, 25 Nov 2023 05:42:25 -0800 (PST), JE Corbett
    <jecorbett4@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Saturday, November 25, 2023 at 8:30:27?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Saturday, November 25, 2023 at 8:22:31?AM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:
    On Saturday, November 25, 2023 at 1:04:04?AM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote: >>>> If Rubys a proven perjuror, I'd love to see the evidence. When do you intend to post it here?
    You think an opinion expressed by Ruby in an unsworn statement to reporters is evidence of perjury? If I were you,
    I would contact that correspondence law school you got your legal training from and demand your money back.
    You know you're responding to Hank, right ?
    Hank's the one talking about Ruby's perjury.
    I posted the video in response to the thread topic. ( Ruby implicates LBJ ) >>
    Idiot.

    Yes.

    Nothing need be added.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to gjjmail1202@gmail.com on Fri Dec 1 14:37:33 2023
    On Sat, 25 Nov 2023 02:48:26 -0800 (PST), Gil Jesus
    <gjjmail1202@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Saturday, November 25, 2023 at 1:04:04?AM UTC-5, Hank Sienzant wrote:
    If Rubys a proven perjuror, I'd love to see the evidence. When do you intend to post it here?

    Here ya go:
    Jack Ruby tells reporters that if the Far Left liberal Adlai Stevenson had been Vice-President, Kennedy would never have been assassinated
    and that the reason why he was, was because the right-wing Deep State preferred Johnson.

    https://youtu.be/70kIINe4cbs

    Let's not forget his lying during the lie detector tests that the HSCA
    pointed out.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Mon Dec 4 08:17:07 2023
    On Sun, 3 Dec 2023 18:48:09 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
    <hsienzant@aol.com> wrote:

    You've claimed that the "A.B.C.D." in the Autopsy Report is the
    description of the *location* of the large head wound.

    Yet you refuse time and time again from QUOTING the preceding
    paragraph that describes what this ACTUALLY is. Why is that?

    You've also claimed that the prosectors dissected the throat wound.

    Why do you continue to refuse to cite any evidence for this?

    Why have you CONSISTENTLY run away each time I raise this issue?

    Now you've quite stupidly insisted that the bullet entered JFK's back,
    and exited the back of his head.

    More cowardice, more stupidity, more dishonesty.

    Are you proud of yourself?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)