1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. ALT.CONSPIRACY.JFK

  • Oh, goody! Meathead has solved the JFK assassination

    From JE Corbett@21:1/5 to All on Wed Nov 22 20:06:03 2023
    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/who-killed-jfk-rob-reiner-says-he-solved-assassination/vi-AA1kmYaY?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=5f9ad89fd477477096208dd8a4397e0a&ei=4

    Of course he's going to tell us in a 10 part series on his podcast. I'm completely
    in the dark when it comes to the world of podcasts but my AI app tells me the more listeners a podcast draws, the more advertisers will pay. I guess even a Meathead figured out he can milk this thing for 10 episodes rather than telling everyone all at once who killed JFK.

    Hey, Meathead. I already know who killed JFK.

    Hint: his initials were LHO.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bud@21:1/5 to Ben Holmes on Tue Nov 28 12:07:16 2023
    On Tuesday, November 28, 2023 at 2:35:31 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Wed, 22 Nov 2023 20:06:03 -0800 (PST), JE Corbett
    <jecor...@gmail.com> wrote:

    Logical fallacy deleted.

    <snicker> Ben takes his trolling seriously.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Tue Nov 28 11:35:27 2023
    On Wed, 22 Nov 2023 20:06:03 -0800 (PST), JE Corbett
    <jecorbett4@gmail.com> wrote:

    Logical fallacy deleted.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Tue Nov 28 12:37:19 2023
    On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 12:07:16 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
    wrote:

    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Tue Nov 28 13:04:52 2023
    On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 13:01:05 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
    wrote:

    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bud@21:1/5 to Ben Holmes on Tue Nov 28 13:01:05 2023
    On Tuesday, November 28, 2023 at 3:37:24 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 12:07:16 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
    wrote:

    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    There`s a good troll.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)