1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. ALT.CONSPIRACY.JFK

  • Excellent Excerpts Proving Shots From The Front Posted By Gil Jesus

    From NoTrueFlags Here@21:1/5 to All on Thu Nov 16 21:45:20 2023
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_NHCCuTk3U I think most of it comes from The Men Who Killed Kennedy, something that series got right.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gil Jesus@21:1/5 to NoTrueFlags Here on Fri Nov 17 02:00:45 2023
    On Friday, November 17, 2023 at 12:45:22 AM UTC-5, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_NHCCuTk3U I think most of it comes from The Men Who Killed Kennedy, something that series got right.

    Thank You and yes you are correct about the source.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JE Corbett@21:1/5 to Gil Jesus on Fri Nov 17 02:44:00 2023
    On Friday, November 17, 2023 at 5:00:47 AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Friday, November 17, 2023 at 12:45:22 AM UTC-5, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_NHCCuTk3U I think most of it comes from The Men Who Killed Kennedy, something that series got right.
    Thank You and yes you are correct about the source.

    One would have to be incredibly gullible to believe that series was a factual account of the assassination. All one would have
    to do is look at how much credence they gave to Badgeman.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JE Corbett@21:1/5 to Gil Jesus on Fri Nov 17 03:15:07 2023
    On Friday, November 17, 2023 at 5:55:25 AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Friday, November 17, 2023 at 5:44:02 AM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:
    One would have to be incredibly gullible to believe that series was a factual account of the assassination. All one would have
    to do is look at how much credence they gave to Badgeman.
    Do you understand what consilience is?

    Obviously, you don't.

    In history, it is the principle that evidence from independent, unrelated sources can "converge" on strong conclusions.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consilience#:~:text=In%20science%20and%20history%2C%20consilience,%22converge%22%20on%20strong%20conclusions.

    Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. Chuck should be flattered.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gil Jesus@21:1/5 to JE Corbett on Fri Nov 17 02:55:23 2023
    On Friday, November 17, 2023 at 5:44:02 AM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:
    One would have to be incredibly gullible to believe that series was a factual account of the assassination. All one would have
    to do is look at how much credence they gave to Badgeman.

    Do you understand what consilience is?

    In history, it is the principle that evidence from independent, unrelated sources can "converge" on strong conclusions.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consilience#:~:text=In%20science%20and%20history%2C%20consilience,%22converge%22%20on%20strong%20conclusions.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gil Jesus@21:1/5 to Bud on Fri Nov 17 03:20:52 2023
    On Friday, November 17, 2023 at 6:18:07 AM UTC-5, Bud wrote:
    You don`t. You think it means "cooperation".

    Oh look the Villiage Idiot is reading my mind.
    Let's all stop and bask in his genius.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gil Jesus@21:1/5 to JE Corbett on Fri Nov 17 03:19:04 2023
    On Friday, November 17, 2023 at 6:15:09 AM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:
    Do you understand what consilience is?
    Obviously, you don't.

    No obviously, you don't.
    Independent, unrelated sources producing evidence that there was at least one shot fired from the front and you don't consider that consilience ?
    ROFLMAO

    You people are great with the double-standards.
    Keep it up. I need a good laugh.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bud@21:1/5 to Gil Jesus on Fri Nov 17 03:18:04 2023
    On Friday, November 17, 2023 at 5:55:25 AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Friday, November 17, 2023 at 5:44:02 AM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:
    One would have to be incredibly gullible to believe that series was a factual account of the assassination. All one would have
    to do is look at how much credence they gave to Badgeman.
    Do you understand what consilience is?

    You don`t. You think it means "cooperation".

    In history, it is the principle that evidence from independent, unrelated sources can "converge" on strong conclusions.

    How does the autopsy report findings of two shots fired from above and behind fit into this "consilience"?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consilience#:~:text=In%20science%20and%20history%2C%20consilience,%22converge%22%20on%20strong%20conclusions.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Donald Willis@21:1/5 to NoTrueFlags Here on Fri Nov 17 09:45:51 2023
    On Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 9:45:22 PM UTC-8, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_NHCCuTk3U I think most of it comes from The Men Who Killed Kennedy, something that series got right.

    Connie Kritzberg and I exchanged emails at one point in time. The information in the above video is also contained in her book, "Secrets from the Sixth Floor Window", pages 18-19. The main subject of our e-correspondence were the evasions by Bob
    Jackson on why he didn't get a photo of the rifle in the window. Over the years, he came up with several explanations...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BT George@21:1/5 to JE Corbett on Fri Nov 17 09:48:42 2023
    On Friday, November 17, 2023 at 5:15:09 AM UTC-6, JE Corbett wrote:
    On Friday, November 17, 2023 at 5:55:25 AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Friday, November 17, 2023 at 5:44:02 AM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:
    One would have to be incredibly gullible to believe that series was a factual account of the assassination. All one would have
    to do is look at how much credence they gave to Badgeman.
    Do you understand what consilience is?
    Obviously, you don't.

    In history, it is the principle that evidence from independent, unrelated sources can "converge" on strong conclusions.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consilience#:~:text=In%20science%20and%20history%2C%20consilience,%22converge%22%20on%20strong%20conclusions.
    Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. Chuck should be flattered.

    He will be. ..Till he considers the source!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gil Jesus@21:1/5 to BT George on Fri Nov 17 11:40:52 2023
    On Friday, November 17, 2023 at 12:48:44 PM UTC-5, BT George wrote:
    He will be. ..Till he considers the source!

    And what year can we expect you to post some evidence instead of insults ?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to jecorbett4@gmail.com on Mon Nov 27 08:13:28 2023
    On Fri, 17 Nov 2023 03:15:07 -0800 (PST), JE Corbett
    <jecorbett4@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Friday, November 17, 2023 at 5:55:25?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Friday, November 17, 2023 at 5:44:02?AM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:
    One would have to be incredibly gullible to believe that series was a factual account of the assassination. All one would have
    to do is look at how much credence they gave to Badgeman.
    Do you understand what consilience is?

    Logical fallacy deleted...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to gjjmail1202@gmail.com on Mon Nov 27 08:13:37 2023
    On Fri, 17 Nov 2023 03:20:52 -0800 (PST), Gil Jesus
    <gjjmail1202@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Friday, November 17, 2023 at 6:18:07?AM UTC-5, Bud wrote:
    You don`t. You think it means "cooperation".

    Oh look the Villiage Idiot is reading my mind.
    Let's all stop and bask in his genius.

    "Independent, unrelated sources producing evidence ..." and
    Chickenshit thinks that "cooperation" was anywhere implied.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bud@21:1/5 to Ben Holmes on Mon Nov 27 11:26:23 2023
    On Monday, November 27, 2023 at 11:13:41 AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Fri, 17 Nov 2023 03:20:52 -0800 (PST), Gil Jesus
    <gjjma...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Friday, November 17, 2023 at 6:18:07?AM UTC-5, Bud wrote:
    You don`t. You think it means "cooperation".

    Oh look the Villiage Idiot is reading my mind.
    Let's all stop and bask in his genius.
    "Independent, unrelated sources producing evidence ..." and
    Chickenshit thinks that "cooperation" was anywhere implied.

    Early morning posting before the coffee kicked in. I meant "corroboration", which I misspelled, and then took what the spell checker offered without a close reading.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Mon Nov 27 11:56:03 2023
    On Mon, 27 Nov 2023 11:26:23 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
    wrote:

    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Thu Nov 30 13:41:35 2023
    On Fri, 17 Nov 2023 03:18:04 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
    wrote:

    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)