Consilience.conspiracy of some sort killed JFK. You guys can't agree if Oswald was the shooter, or how many shots were fired or whether JFK's body/coffin was hijacked for a secret autopsy, or whether the Zapruder film was altered, and on and on.
Do you understand what consilience is?
In history, it is the principle that evidence from independent, unrelated sources can "converge" on strong conclusions.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consilience#:~:text=In%20science%20and%20history%2C%20consilience,%22converge%22%20on%20strong%20conclusions.
Why is there so much consilience in the evidence that points towards Oswald as the assassin on 11/22/63, and why doesn't "Team Oswald" have independent, unrelated sources that converge on strong conclusions? All Team Oswald can agree on is that a vague
It is not possible that all these arrows would be pointing in the same wrong direction.
On Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 7:25:50 AM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:
It is not possible that all these arrows would be pointing in the same wrong direction.And of course, the Dallas DA and police would NEVER frame an innocent man for a crime he didn't commit, right ?
I mean, it's even insane to think that.
Tell that to James Lee Woodard — released in April 2008 after 27 years in prison for a murder DNA showed he didn't commit — Wade's office withheld from defense attorneys photographs of tire tracks at the crime scene that didn't match Woodard's car.
Can you say, "prosecutorial misconduct" ?
Tell that to the other 18 defendants who were convicted under Wade for crimes they didn't commit and whose convictions were overturned on DNA evidence.
https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna25917791
Tell that to the family of Tommy Lee Walker. In 1954, Wade persuaded a jury to send Walker to the electric chair just three months after his arrest.
But a new look at the case reveals one of the greatest injustices in Dallas history.
https://www.dmagazine.com/publications/d-magazine/2016/may/henry-wade-executed-innocent-man/
I'm sure there were plenty of "consiliences" in those cases as well.
The authenticity of the evidence relies solely on the credibility of those handling it.
These defendants were framed for crimes they did not commit by your Dallas Police and your Dallas DA.
The same corrupt bastards that drank for free at Jack Ruby's bar. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZtyLFcZvG4k
The same corrupt bastards who refused to take a report from Nancy Perrin Rich when Jack Ruby assaulted her. ( 14 H 343 )
These are your honest cops and DA.
Idiots.
On Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 7:25:50 AM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:
It is not possible that all these arrows would be pointing in the same wrong direction.And of course, the Dallas DA and police would NEVER frame an innocent man for a crime he didn't commit, right ?
I mean, it's even insane to think that.
Tell that to James Lee Woodard — released in April 2008 after 27 years in prison for a murder DNA showed he didn't commit — Wade's office withheld from defense attorneys photographs of tire tracks at the crime scene that didn't match Woodard's car.
Can you say, "prosecutorial misconduct" ?
Tell that to the other 18 defendants who were convicted under Wade for crimes they didn't commit and whose convictions were overturned on DNA evidence.
https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna25917791
Tell that to the family of Tommy Lee Walker. In 1954, Wade persuaded a jury to send Walker to the electric chair just three months after his arrest.
But a new look at the case reveals one of the greatest injustices in Dallas history.
https://www.dmagazine.com/publications/d-magazine/2016/may/henry-wade-executed-innocent-man/
I'm sure there were plenty of "consiliences" in those cases as well.
The authenticity of the evidence relies solely on the credibility of those handling it.
These defendants were framed for crimes they did not commit by your Dallas Police and your Dallas DA.
The same corrupt bastards that drank for free at Jack Ruby's bar. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZtyLFcZvG4k
The same corrupt bastards who refused to take a report from Nancy Perrin Rich when Jack Ruby assaulted her. ( 14 H 343 )
These are your honest cops and DA.
Idiots.
why doesn't "Team Oswald" have independent, unrelated sources that converge on strong conclusions?
On Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 9:36:57 AM UTC-5, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
why doesn't "Team Oswald" have independent, unrelated sources that converge on strong conclusions?
On Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 8:04:22 AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:car.
On Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 7:25:50 AM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:
It is not possible that all these arrows would be pointing in the same wrong direction.And of course, the Dallas DA and police would NEVER frame an innocent man for a crime he didn't commit, right ?
I mean, it's even insane to think that.
Tell that to James Lee Woodard — released in April 2008 after 27 years in prison for a murder DNA showed he didn't commit — Wade's office withheld from defense attorneys photographs of tire tracks at the crime scene that didn't match Woodard's
Can you say, "prosecutorial misconduct" ?
Tell that to the other 18 defendants who were convicted under Wade for crimes they didn't commit and whose convictions were overturned on DNA evidence.
https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna25917791
Tell that to the family of Tommy Lee Walker. In 1954, Wade persuaded a jury to send Walker to the electric chair just three months after his arrest.
But a new look at the case reveals one of the greatest injustices in Dallas history.
https://www.dmagazine.com/publications/d-magazine/2016/may/henry-wade-executed-innocent-man/
I'm sure there were plenty of "consiliences" in those cases as well.
The authenticity of the evidence relies solely on the credibility of those handling it.
These defendants were framed for crimes they did not commit by your Dallas Police and your Dallas DA.
The same corrupt bastards that drank for free at Jack Ruby's bar. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZtyLFcZvG4k
The same corrupt bastards who refused to take a report from Nancy Perrin Rich when Jack Ruby assaulted her. ( 14 H 343 )
These are your honest cops and DA.
Idiots.Wade never prosecuted Oswald so your argument is moot. The Warren Commission was charged with analyzing the evidence
and reaching the conclusions based on that evidence.
On Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 12:12:52 PM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 9:36:57 AM UTC-5, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
why doesn't "Team Oswald" have independent, unrelated sources that converge on strong conclusions?
There was plenty of, "evidence from independent, unrelated sources" that 'converged' on strong conclusions.
Was there consilience with regard to the smoke on the knoll ? https://youtu.be/RquU3HdrRw8
Was there consilience with regard to a shot from the front ? https://youtu.be/p_NHCCuTk3U
Was there consilience with regard to the limo slowing almost to a stop once the shooting started ?
https://www.fff.org/2023/08/14/the-evidence-that-convicts-the-cia-of-the-jfk-assassination-part-2/
But you don't accept any of that evidence.
So take your one-sided "consilience" and shove it up your ass.
sideways
On Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 6:35:17 AM UTC-8, JE Corbett wrote:car.
On Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 8:04:22 AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 7:25:50 AM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:
It is not possible that all these arrows would be pointing in the same wrong direction.And of course, the Dallas DA and police would NEVER frame an innocent man for a crime he didn't commit, right ?
I mean, it's even insane to think that.
Tell that to James Lee Woodard — released in April 2008 after 27 years in prison for a murder DNA showed he didn't commit — Wade's office withheld from defense attorneys photographs of tire tracks at the crime scene that didn't match Woodard's
nutter circles, Trump is infectious...Can you say, "prosecutorial misconduct" ?
Tell that to the other 18 defendants who were convicted under Wade for crimes they didn't commit and whose convictions were overturned on DNA evidence.
https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna25917791
Tell that to the family of Tommy Lee Walker. In 1954, Wade persuaded a jury to send Walker to the electric chair just three months after his arrest.
But a new look at the case reveals one of the greatest injustices in Dallas history.
https://www.dmagazine.com/publications/d-magazine/2016/may/henry-wade-executed-innocent-man/
I'm sure there were plenty of "consiliences" in those cases as well.
The authenticity of the evidence relies solely on the credibility of those handling it.
These defendants were framed for crimes they did not commit by your Dallas Police and your Dallas DA.
The same corrupt bastards that drank for free at Jack Ruby's bar. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZtyLFcZvG4k
The same corrupt bastards who refused to take a report from Nancy Perrin Rich when Jack Ruby assaulted her. ( 14 H 343 )
These are your honest cops and DA.
nor did the Warren Commission, nor the Fed, nor Dallas, nor Jack Frost... Hopefully your stipend is a pittance, fucking, laughable moron... Bud the Dudster certainly isn't getting the support he deserves... Appears senility is running rampant in loneIdiots.Wade never prosecuted Oswald so your argument is moot. The Warren Commission was charged with analyzing the evidence
and reaching the conclusions based on that evidence.
On Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 12:12:52 PM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 9:36:57 AM UTC-5, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
why doesn't "Team Oswald" have independent, unrelated sources that converge on strong conclusions?
There was plenty of, "evidence from independent, unrelated sources" that 'converged' on strong conclusions.
Was there consilience with regard to the smoke on the knoll ? https://youtu.be/RquU3HdrRw8
Was there consilience with regard to a shot from the front ? https://youtu.be/p_NHCCuTk3U
Was there consilience with regard to the limo slowing almost to a stop once the shooting started ?
https://www.fff.org/2023/08/14/the-evidence-that-convicts-the-cia-of-the-jfk-assassination-part-2/
But you don't accept any of that evidence.
So take your one-sided "consilience" and shove it up your ass.
sideways
Was there consilience with regard to the limo slowing almost to a stop once the shooting started ?No. Not shown on the Zapruder film.
https://www.fff.org/2023/08/14/the-evidence-that-convicts-the-cia-of-the-jfk-assassination-part-2/
No, Gil has no understanding, nor any interest in "consilience". It is like "parsimony", these are tools used in reasoning in order to get to the truth of matters. It is of no use to Gil (or Ben), as they have no real interest
in getting to the truth, only to play silly games with the deaths of these men.
On Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 3:24:35 PM UTC-5, Bud wrote:
No, Gil has no understanding, nor any interest in "consilience". It is like "parsimony", these are tools used in reasoning in order to get to the truth of matters. It is of no use to Gil (or Ben), as they have no real interestOh look the Village Idiot has another opinion.
in getting to the truth, only to play silly games with the deaths of these men.
That MUST be the truth if he says it.
Consilience.
Do you understand what consilience is?
In history, it is the principle that evidence from independent, unrelated sources can "converge" on strong conclusions.conspiracy of some sort killed JFK. You guys can't agree if Oswald was the shooter, or how many shots were fired or whether JFK's body/coffin was hijacked for a secret autopsy, or whether the Zapruder film was altered, and on and on.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consilience#:~:text=In%20science%20and%20history%2C%20consilience,%22converge%22%20on%20strong%20conclusions.
Why is there so much consilience in the evidence that points towards Oswald as the assassin on 11/22/63, and why doesn't "Team Oswald" have independent, unrelated sources that converge on strong conclusions? All Team Oswald can agree on is that a vague
On Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 3:05:10 PM UTC-5, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
Was there consilience with regard to the limo slowing almost to a stop once the shooting started ?No. Not shown on the Zapruder film.
https://www.fff.org/2023/08/14/the-evidence-that-convicts-the-cia-of-the-jfk-assassination-part-2/
Once again you lie. Do you ever tell the truth ?
59 witness said the limo either slowed down or stopped on Elm St.
Limo slowdown corroborated by Z-frames 257-331, which show that the limo slowed so much that the motorcycle on the far side almost came up alongside the rear wheel.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/limo-slowdown-Z257-331.mp4
Limo slowdown corroborated by the Nix film. https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/nix-limo-slowdown.mp4
You people are such fucking liars.
On Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 3:42:05 PM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 3:24:35 PM UTC-5, Bud wrote:These processes have been developed as tools by thinking people as a means of arriving at the truth. They aren`t for everybody, particularly not idiots like yourself.
No, Gil has no understanding, nor any interest in "consilience". It is like "parsimony", these are tools used in reasoning in order to get to the truth of matters. It is of no use to Gil (or Ben), as they have no real interestOh look the Village Idiot has another opinion.
in getting to the truth, only to play silly games with the deaths of these men.
That MUST be the truth if he says it.
On Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 3:05:10 PM UTC-5, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
Once again you lie. Do you ever tell the truth ?Was there consilience with regard to the limo slowing almost to a stop once the shooting started ?No. Not shown on the Zapruder film.
https://www.fff.org/2023/08/14/the-evidence-that-convicts-the-cia-of-the-jfk-assassination-part-2/
59 witness said the limo either slowed down or stopped on Elm St.
Limo slowdown corroborated by Z-frames 257-331, which show that the limo slowed so much that the motorcycle on the far side almost came up alongside the rear wheel.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/limo-slowdown-Z257-331.mp4
Limo slowdown corroborated by the Nix film. https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/nix-limo-slowdown.mp4
You people are such fucking liars.
On Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 3:42:05 PM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 3:24:35 PM UTC-5, Bud wrote:These processes have been developed as tools by thinking people as a means of arriving at the truth. They aren`t for everybody, particularly not idiots like yourself.
No, Gil has no understanding, nor any interest in "consilience". It is like "parsimony", these are tools used in reasoning in order to get to the truth of matters. It is of no use to Gil (or Ben), as they have no real interestOh look the Village Idiot has another opinion.
in getting to the truth, only to play silly games with the deaths of these men.
That MUST be the truth if he says it.
On Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 2:57:41 PM UTC-6, Bud wrote:
On Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 3:42:05 PM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:Especially when truth is the *last* thing you are looking for!
On Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 3:24:35 PM UTC-5, Bud wrote:These processes have been developed as tools by thinking people as a means of arriving at the truth. They aren`t for everybody, particularly not idiots like yourself.
No, Gil has no understanding, nor any interest in "consilience". It is like "parsimony", these are tools used in reasoning in order to get to the truth of matters. It is of no use to Gil (or Ben), as they have no real interestOh look the Village Idiot has another opinion.
in getting to the truth, only to play silly games with the deaths of these men.
That MUST be the truth if he says it.
On Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 11:22:34 AM UTC-6, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 12:12:52 PM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 9:36:57 AM UTC-5, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
why doesn't "Team Oswald" have independent, unrelated sources that converge on strong conclusions?
There was plenty of, "evidence from independent, unrelated sources" that 'converged' on strong conclusions.You need to read the definition of consilience again.
Was there consilience with regard to the smoke on the knoll ? https://youtu.be/RquU3HdrRw8The YouTube clip doesn't provide any consilience from "unrelated" sources.
Was there consilience with regard to a shot from the front ? https://youtu.be/p_NHCCuTk3UNo. There is consilience for shots from above and behind. (Ballistics, a recovered weapon, earwitnesses to shots above on the fifth floor of the TSBD, eyewitnesses of a shooter/rifle being seen on an upper floor of the TSBD, an autopsy report, etc.)
Was there consilience with regard to the limo slowing almost to a stop once the shooting started ?No. Not shown on the Zapruder film.
https://www.fff.org/2023/08/14/the-evidence-that-convicts-the-cia-of-the-jfk-assassination-part-2/
But you don't accept any of that evidence.Consilience, Gil. Looking for consilience. Read the definition again.
So take your one-sided "consilience" and shove it up your ass.Frustrating day for you already.
sideways
On Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 12:05:10 PM UTC-8, Chuck Schuyler wrote:Wisconsin way-back-when do ya ?
On Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 11:22:34 AM UTC-6, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 12:12:52 PM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 9:36:57 AM UTC-5, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
why doesn't "Team Oswald" have independent, unrelated sources that converge on strong conclusions?
There was plenty of, "evidence from independent, unrelated sources" that 'converged' on strong conclusions.You need to read the definition of consilience again.
Was there consilience with regard to the smoke on the knoll ? https://youtu.be/RquU3HdrRw8The YouTube clip doesn't provide any consilience from "unrelated" sources.
Was there consilience with regard to a shot from the front ? https://youtu.be/p_NHCCuTk3UNo. There is consilience for shots from above and behind. (Ballistics, a recovered weapon, earwitnesses to shots above on the fifth floor of the TSBD, eyewitnesses of a shooter/rifle being seen on an upper floor of the TSBD, an autopsy report, etc.)
Was there consilience with regard to the limo slowing almost to a stop once the shooting started ?No. Not shown on the Zapruder film.
https://www.fff.org/2023/08/14/the-evidence-that-convicts-the-cia-of-the-jfk-assassination-part-2/
not as bad as .john's I'll tell ya... I spoke with a contact in Purgatory, they can't get .johnny outa that special trench-coat and fedora he fancies so much, ya don't think it was muzzle blasts from BB guns he used stalking static sandbags in upperBut you don't accept any of that evidence.Consilience, Gil. Looking for consilience. Read the definition again.
So take your one-sided "consilience" and shove it up your ass.Frustrating day for you already.
sideways
thus speaketh Queen Judyth... 60 years and nutter-fucks STILL can't close the WCR deal...
On Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 9:01:20 PM UTC-5, David wrote:
thus speaketh Queen Judyth... 60 years and nutter-fucks STILL can't close the WCR deal...These people are trolls with NO credibility.
They're only here to comment and insult because they have nothing else to do in their pitiful, boring, and pathetic lives.
The only thing they've accomplished is proving to the world what assholes they are, a record that will endure long after they leave this life.
Their children and grandchildren will look up their names on the internet and will see what haters, liars and deceivers they were.
Their children and grandchildren will see that they were closed-minded cowards who ran from the evidence and couldn't support their position.
Their parents will rollover in their graves and their decendants will live with the guilt and shame of their foolishness.
And THAT will be their legacy.
A legacy that supported the state-sponsored murder of a President of the United States and the government's coverup of its involvement.
Yes, Virginia, you CAN get away with murder as long as you can control the evidence.
Their very presence here is proof that they don't believe the case was closed 60 years ago, because if they believed that it was, they wouldn't waste their time here.
On Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 7:04:22?AM UTC-6, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 7:25:50?AM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:
It is not possible that all these arrows would be pointing in the same wrong direction.And of course, the Dallas DA and police would NEVER frame an innocent man for a crime he didn't commit, right ?
I mean, it's even insane to think that.
Tell that to James Lee Woodard — released in April 2008 after 27 years in prison for a murder DNA showed he didn't commit — Wade's office withheld from defense attorneys photographs of tire tracks at the crime scene that didn't match Woodard's car.
Can you say, "prosecutorial misconduct" ?
Tell that to the other 18 defendants who were convicted under Wade for crimes they didn't commit and whose convictions were overturned on DNA evidence.
https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna25917791
Tell that to the family of Tommy Lee Walker. In 1954, Wade persuaded a jury to send Walker to the electric chair just three months after his arrest.
But a new look at the case reveals one of the greatest injustices in Dallas history.
https://www.dmagazine.com/publications/d-magazine/2016/may/henry-wade-executed-innocent-man/
I'm sure there were plenty of "consiliences" in those cases as well.
The authenticity of the evidence relies solely on the credibility of those handling it.
These defendants were framed for crimes they did not commit by your Dallas Police and your Dallas DA.
The same corrupt bastards that drank for free at Jack Ruby's bar.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZtyLFcZvG4k
The same corrupt bastards who refused to take a report from Nancy Perrin Rich when Jack Ruby assaulted her. ( 14 H 343 )
These are your honest cops and DA.
Idiots.
Your response is a red herring and a strawman argument.
On Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 8:04:22?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 7:25:50?AM UTC-5, JE Corbett wrote:
It is not possible that all these arrows would be pointing in the same wrong direction.And of course, the Dallas DA and police would NEVER frame an innocent man for a crime he didn't commit, right ?
I mean, it's even insane to think that.
Tell that to James Lee Woodard — released in April 2008 after 27 years in prison for a murder DNA showed he didn't commit — Wade's office withheld from defense attorneys photographs of tire tracks at the crime scene that didn't match Woodard's car.
Can you say, "prosecutorial misconduct" ?
Tell that to the other 18 defendants who were convicted under Wade for crimes they didn't commit and whose convictions were overturned on DNA evidence.
https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna25917791
Tell that to the family of Tommy Lee Walker. In 1954, Wade persuaded a jury to send Walker to the electric chair just three months after his arrest.
But a new look at the case reveals one of the greatest injustices in Dallas history.
https://www.dmagazine.com/publications/d-magazine/2016/may/henry-wade-executed-innocent-man/
I'm sure there were plenty of "consiliences" in those cases as well.
The authenticity of the evidence relies solely on the credibility of those handling it.
These defendants were framed for crimes they did not commit by your Dallas Police and your Dallas DA.
The same corrupt bastards that drank for free at Jack Ruby's bar.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZtyLFcZvG4k
The same corrupt bastards who refused to take a report from Nancy Perrin Rich when Jack Ruby assaulted her. ( 14 H 343 )
These are your honest cops and DA.
Idiots.
Wade never prosecuted Oswald so your argument is moot.
Consilience.
Do you understand what consilience is?
In history...
Why is there so much consilience in the evidence that points towards
Oswald as the assassin on 11/22/63,
and why doesn't "Team Oswald" have independent, unrelated sources
that converge on strong conclusions?
On Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 9:01:20 PM UTC-5, David wrote:
thus speaketh Queen Judyth... 60 years and nutter-fucks STILL can't close the WCR deal...These people are trolls with NO credibility.
They're only here to comment and insult because they have nothing else to do in their pitiful, boring, and pathetic lives.
The only thing they've accomplished is proving to the world what assholes they are, a record that will endure long after they leave this life.
Their children and grandchildren will look up their names on the internet and will see what haters, liars and deceivers they were.
Their children and grandchildren will see that they were closed-minded cowards who ran from the evidence and couldn't support their position.
Their parents will rollover in their graves and their decendants will live with the guilt and shame of their foolishness.
And THAT will be their legacy.
A legacy that supported the state-sponsored murder of a President of the United States and the government's coverup of its involvement.
Yes, Virginia, you CAN get away with murder as long as you can control the evidence.
Their very presence here is proof that they don't believe the case was closed 60 years ago, because if they believed that it was, they wouldn't waste their time here.
On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 12:05:09 -0800 (PST), Chuck Schuyler <chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 11:22:34?AM UTC-6, Gil Jesus wrote:Logical fallacy deleted.
On Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 12:12:52?PM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 9:36:57?AM UTC-5, Chuck Schuyler wrote:There was plenty of, "evidence from independent, unrelated sources" that 'converged' on strong conclusions.
why doesn't "Team Oswald" have independent, unrelated sources that converge on strong conclusions?
Logical fallacy deleted.Was there consilience with regard to the smoke on the knoll ?
https://youtu.be/RquU3HdrRw8
Was there consilience with regard to a shot from the front ?
https://youtu.be/p_NHCCuTk3U
No.Lying about it won't convince anyone...
Was there consilience with regard to the limo slowing almost to a stop once the shooting started ?
https://www.fff.org/2023/08/14/the-evidence-that-convicts-the-cia-of-the-jfk-assassination-part-2/
No. Not shown on the Zapruder film.Seen CLEARLY in the Nix film. Corroborated by DOZENS of eyewitnesses.
You lose!
But you don't accept any of that evidence.
Consilience, Gil.He just gave examples that you're running from...
So take your one-sided "consilience" and shove it up your ass.
sideways
On Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 9:01:20 PM UTC-5, David wrote:
thus speaketh Queen Judyth... 60 years and nutter-fucks STILL can't close the WCR deal...
These people are trolls with NO credibility.
They're only here to comment and insult because they have nothing else to do in their pitiful, boring, and pathetic lives.
The only thing they've accomplished is proving to the world what assholes they are, a record that will endure long after they leave this life.
Their children and grandchildren will look up their names on the internet and will see what haters, liars and deceivers they were.
Their children and grandchildren will see that they were closed-minded cowards who ran from the evidence and couldn't support their position.
Their parents will rollover in their graves and their decendants will live with the guilt and shame of their foolishness.
And THAT will be their legacy.
A legacy that supported the state-sponsored murder of a President of the United States and the government's coverup of its involvement.
Yes, Virginia, you CAN get away with murder as long as you can control the evidence.
Their very presence here is proof that they don't believe the case was closed 60 years ago, because if they believed that it was, they wouldn't waste their time here.
On Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 12:12:52 PM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 9:36:57 AM UTC-5, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
why doesn't "Team Oswald" have independent, unrelated sources that converge on strong conclusions?
There was plenty of, "evidence from independent, unrelated sources" that 'converged' on strong conclusions.
Was there consilience with regard to the smoke on the knoll ? https://youtu.be/RquU3HdrRw8
Was there consilience with regard to a shot from the front ? https://youtu.be/p_NHCCuTk3U
Was there consilience with regard to the limo slowing almost to a stop once the shooting started ?
https://www.fff.org/2023/08/14/the-evidence-that-convicts-the-cia-of-the-jfk-assassination-part-2/
But you don't accept any of that evidence.
So take your one-sided "consilience" and shove it up your ass.
sideways
On Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 12:22:34 PM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 12:12:52 PM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 9:36:57 AM UTC-5, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
why doesn't "Team Oswald" have independent, unrelated sources that converge on strong conclusions?
There was plenty of, "evidence from independent, unrelated sources" that 'converged' on strong conclusions.
Was there consilience with regard to the smoke on the knoll ? https://youtu.be/RquU3HdrRw8You don’t understand what consilience is. Eyewitness testimony is not consilience.
Was there consilience with regard to a shot from the front ? https://youtu.be/p_NHCCuTk3UNo, because there was no shot from the front. The autopsy doctors determined the shot came from behind. The Zapruder film shows the same damage to the top-right side of JFK’s head as the autopsy photos.
Was there consilience with regard to the limo slowing almost to a stop once the shooting started ?
https://www.fff.org/2023/08/14/the-evidence-that-convicts-the-cia-of-the-jfk-assassination-part-2/
The z-film shows the limo slowing down between landmarks, but it’s difficult to measure the speed when all you have is a green background.
But you don't accept any of that evidence.More evidence you don’t understand consilience. It’s not a physical object that you can put in an orifice.
So take your one-sided "consilience" and shove it up your ass.
sideways
On Tuesday, November 21, 2023 at 6:13:02 PM UTC-8, Hank Sienzant wrote:the great state of Minnesota..... burp!
On Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 12:22:34 PM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 12:12:52 PM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 9:36:57 AM UTC-5, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
why doesn't "Team Oswald" have independent, unrelated sources that converge on strong conclusions?
There was plenty of, "evidence from independent, unrelated sources" that 'converged' on strong conclusions.
Was there consilience with regard to the smoke on the knoll ? https://youtu.be/RquU3HdrRw8You don’t understand what consilience is. Eyewitness testimony is not consilience.
Was there consilience with regard to a shot from the front ? https://youtu.be/p_NHCCuTk3UNo, because there was no shot from the front. The autopsy doctors determined the shot came from behind. The Zapruder film shows the same damage to the top-right side of JFK’s head as the autopsy photos.
Was there consilience with regard to the limo slowing almost to a stop once the shooting started ?
https://www.fff.org/2023/08/14/the-evidence-that-convicts-the-cia-of-the-jfk-assassination-part-2/
The z-film shows the limo slowing down between landmarks, but it’s difficult to measure the speed when all you have is a green background.good gawd...nutters can't seem to get away from filling a hole, ANY hole with something -- why should the JFK assassination be any different... May Incel, Kyle Rittenhouse will lend you a hand when he is finally convinced to run for Congress rep'ing
But you don't accept any of that evidence.More evidence you don’t understand consilience. It’s not a physical object that you can put in an orifice.
So take your one-sided "consilience" and shove it up your ass.
sideways
On Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 8:12:27?PM UTC-6, David wrote:Wisconsin way-back-when do ya ?
On Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 12:05:10?PM UTC-8, Chuck Schuyler wrote: >>> On Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 11:22:34?AM UTC-6, Gil Jesus wrote:
not as bad as .john's I'll tell ya... I spoke with a contact in Purgatory, they can't get .johnny outa that special trench-coat and fedora he fancies so much, ya don't think it was muzzle blasts from BB guns he used stalking static sandbags in upperOn Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 12:12:52?PM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote: >>>>> On Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 9:36:57?AM UTC-5, Chuck Schuyler wrote: >>>>>> why doesn't "Team Oswald" have independent, unrelated sources that converge on strong conclusions?You need to read the definition of consilience again.
There was plenty of, "evidence from independent, unrelated sources" that 'converged' on strong conclusions.
The YouTube clip doesn't provide any consilience from "unrelated" sources. >>>>
Was there consilience with regard to the smoke on the knoll ?
https://youtu.be/RquU3HdrRw8
Was there consilience with regard to a shot from the front ?No. There is consilience for shots from above and behind. (Ballistics, a recovered weapon, earwitnesses to shots above on the fifth floor of the TSBD, eyewitnesses of a shooter/rifle being seen on an upper floor of the TSBD, an autopsy report, etc.)
https://youtu.be/p_NHCCuTk3U
No. Not shown on the Zapruder film.
Was there consilience with regard to the limo slowing almost to a stop once the shooting started ?
https://www.fff.org/2023/08/14/the-evidence-that-convicts-the-cia-of-the-jfk-assassination-part-2/
Consilience, Gil. Looking for consilience. Read the definition again.
But you don't accept any of that evidence.
So take your one-sided "consilience" and shove it up your ass.Frustrating day for you already.
sideways
Rittenhouse ...
On Friday, November 17, 2023 at 5:36:25?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 9:01:20?PM UTC-5, David wrote:
thus speaketh Queen Judyth... 60 years and nutter-fucks STILL can't close the WCR deal...These people are trolls with NO credibility.
They're only here to comment and insult because they have nothing else to do in their pitiful, boring, and pathetic lives.
Says the guy ....
On Friday, November 17, 2023 at 4:36:25?AM UTC-6, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 9:01:20?PM UTC-5, David wrote:
thus speaketh Queen Judyth... 60 years and nutter-fucks STILL can't close the WCR deal...
These people are trolls with NO credibility.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 105:42:50 |
| Calls: | 6,660 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 12,209 |
| Messages: | 5,335,315 |