1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. ALT.CONSPIRACY.JFK

  • Re: Chickenshit Is In His Safe Place - Crying...

    From Bud@21:1/5 to Ben Holmes on Fri Nov 10 15:03:04 2023
    On Friday, November 10, 2023 at 5:53:06 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
    Now that Huckster has refuted his claim that the prosectors dissected
    the throat wound...

    Do you even know what "refute" means?

    Amusingly, Chickenshit can't find the courage to try to correct
    Huckster Sienzant.

    Lying comes naturally to you, I voiced my disagreement with Hank...

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/g13ayJ4AwRk/m/hpiqrMAqCQAJ

    I wonder why that is?

    You`re a delusional, lying idiot?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bud@21:1/5 to Ben Holmes on Fri Nov 10 15:13:18 2023
    On Friday, November 10, 2023 at 6:07:32 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 15:03:04 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
    wrote:

    Yank his chain, and Chickenshit squawks...

    But he can't answer:

    Who says I haven`t?

    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    Huckster spanked him, and he's in his safe place, still crying...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Fri Nov 10 15:07:27 2023
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 15:03:04 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
    wrote:

    Yank his chain, and Chickenshit squawks...

    But he can't answer:

    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    Huckster spanked him, and he's in his safe place, still crying...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Fri Nov 10 14:53:00 2023
    Now that Huckster has refuted his claim that the prosectors dissected
    the throat wound...

    Amusingly, Chickenshit can't find the courage to try to correct
    Huckster Sienzant.

    I wonder why that is?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Fri Nov 10 15:22:24 2023
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 15:13:18 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
    wrote:

    Yank his chain, and Chickenshit squawks again!

    But he still can't answer:

    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    Huckster's laughing now...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bud@21:1/5 to Ben Holmes on Fri Nov 10 15:36:54 2023
    On Friday, November 10, 2023 at 6:22:29 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 15:13:18 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
    wrote:

    Yank his chain, and Chickenshit squawks again!

    But he still can't answer:

    Who says I haven`t?

    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.
    Huckster's laughing now...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bud@21:1/5 to Ben Holmes on Fri Nov 10 16:57:19 2023
    On Friday, November 10, 2023 at 7:36:46 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 15:36:54 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
    wrote:

    Yank his chain, and Chickenshit squawks again!

    Says the troll who responds to everything I write.

    But he still can't answer:

    Nobody says I haven`t.

    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    Huckster's laughing now...

    At who?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Fri Nov 10 16:36:41 2023
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 15:36:54 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
    wrote:

    Yank his chain, and Chickenshit squawks again!

    But he still can't answer:

    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    Huckster's laughing now...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Fri Nov 10 16:58:04 2023
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 16:57:19 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
    wrote:

    Yank his chain, and Chickenshit squawks again!

    But he still can't answer:

    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    Huckster's laughing now...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bud@21:1/5 to Ben Holmes on Fri Nov 10 17:17:21 2023
    On Friday, November 10, 2023 at 7:58:07 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 16:57:19 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
    wrote:

    Yank his chain, and Chickenshit squawks again!

    <snicker> You only encourage me to reply more, to force you to make your trollish responses.

    But he still can't answer:
    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    Huckster's laughing now...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gil Jesus@21:1/5 to Ben Holmes on Sat Nov 11 02:23:51 2023
    On Friday, November 10, 2023 at 5:53:06 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
    Now that Huckster has refuted his claim that the prosectors dissected
    the throat wound...

    Amusingly, Chickenshit can't find the courage to try to correct
    Huckster Sienzant.

    I wonder why that is?

    Running to his safe place and crying is probably what he did when his fellow employee went on a rant and said the CIA killed Kennedy.

    He has a lot to say when he can hide behind a computer and a keyboard, but when that fellow employee told him in person
    that the CIA killed Kennedy, he went mute like a little pussy. https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/jYTjItta_PQ/m/7Zn8BZoHBgAJ

    Yeah, like all these Warren Commission supporters, he's a coward and a liar.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bud@21:1/5 to Gil Jesus on Sat Nov 11 02:50:35 2023
    On Saturday, November 11, 2023 at 5:23:53 AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Friday, November 10, 2023 at 5:53:06 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
    Now that Huckster has refuted his claim that the prosectors dissected
    the throat wound...

    Amusingly, Chickenshit can't find the courage to try to correct
    Huckster Sienzant.

    I wonder why that is?
    Running to his safe place and crying is probably what he did when his fellow employee went on a rant and said the CIA killed Kennedy.

    This is what conspiracy idiots do when they get a little information, they start embellishing it like it is a creative writing exercise.

    He has a lot to say when he can hide behind a computer and a keyboard, but when that fellow employee told him in person
    that the CIA killed Kennedy, he went mute like a little pussy.

    I explain things to you, but I forget you are an idiot who will clings to what he is comfortable believing.

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/jYTjItta_PQ/m/7Zn8BZoHBgAJ

    Yeah, like all these Warren Commission supporters, he's a coward and a liar.

    Like all conspiracy idiots, you are delusional. You create your own little worlds.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Mon Nov 13 15:56:07 2023
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 17:17:21 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
    wrote:


    <snicker> You only encourage me to ...

    Run more..

    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)