• Re: Chuckles - The Coward Who...

    From Bud@21:1/5 to Ben Holmes on Fri Nov 10 13:32:33 2023
    On Friday, November 10, 2023 at 4:26:54 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
    Chuckles, the coward who keeps asking others to do what he refuses to
    do.

    Make that positive case for what you believe.

    Coming up on sixty years ago that case was made.

    You can't do it.

    You lose!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Fri Nov 10 13:55:40 2023
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 13:32:33 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
    wrote:

    It will be 60 years before Chickenshit answers this:

    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Fri Nov 10 13:26:37 2023
    Chuckles, the coward who keeps asking others to do what he refuses to
    do.

    Make that positive case for what you believe.

    You can't do it.

    You lose!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bud@21:1/5 to Ben Holmes on Fri Nov 10 17:18:45 2023
    On Friday, November 10, 2023 at 4:55:45 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 13:32:33 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
    wrote:

    It will be 60 years before Chickenshit answers this:

    Nobody has said I haven`t.

    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    Cue the troll response...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gil Jesus@21:1/5 to Ben Holmes on Sat Nov 11 02:10:58 2023
    On Friday, November 10, 2023 at 4:26:54 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
    Chuckles, the coward who keeps asking others to do what he refuses to
    do.

    Make that positive case for what you believe.

    Chuckles is an internet bully.
    In this newsgroup, his persona is one of someone who serves no other purpose in life but to give the world a lot of shit.
    The exact definition of an asshole.

    He posts:

    No citations
    No documents
    No testimony
    No exhibits
    No witness videos
    No links
    What Charles Schuyler DOES post are comments, speculations, opinions and insults.
    Charles Schuyler is too lazy to do any research of his own.

    He acts like a 10 year old online, insulting people and making fun of their names.
    You might wonder what kind of a man behaves this way ?
    One who's not a man.
    One who's a clown with no credibility.
    That's why we call Charles Schuyler, "Chuckles the Clown".
    Every time he posts, he has us chuckling.

    And to his resume' he adds that he is a coward who avoided responding to 39 of the 40 questions I posted.
    Then lied about it and said he answered them all.

    Chuckles is a lazy, closed-minded, hate-filled, coward of a juvenile clown and a liar to boot.
    He has no knowledge of the case and as a result, lurkers will gain NO KNOWLEDGE from his posts.
    Using a Bud term, Chuckles is, "a big nothingburger", far lower than whale shit.
    At least that's the way he portrays himself.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bud@21:1/5 to Gil Jesus on Sat Nov 11 03:04:55 2023
    On Saturday, November 11, 2023 at 5:11:00 AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Friday, November 10, 2023 at 4:26:54 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
    Chuckles, the coward who keeps asking others to do what he refuses to
    do.

    Make that positive case for what you believe.
    Chuckles is an internet bully.
    In this newsgroup, his persona is one of someone who serves no other purpose in life but to give the world a lot of shit.
    The exact definition of an asshole.

    He posts:

    No citations
    No documents
    No testimony
    No exhibits
    No witness videos
    No links
    What Charles Schuyler DOES post are comments, speculations, opinions and insults.

    And very astute observations.

    Charles Schuyler is too lazy to do any research of his own.

    Should he research whether the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor also?

    He acts like a 10 year old online, insulting people and making fun of their names.

    You supply a gold mine of things to make fun of. You should do something about this.

    You might wonder what kind of a man behaves this way ?
    One who's not a man.

    Very many the way you raise issues and run away all the time.

    One who's a clown with no credibility.
    That's why we call Charles Schuyler, "Chuckles the Clown".
    Every time he posts, he has us chuckling.

    Yes, he makes some wry observations.

    And to his resume' he adds that he is a coward who avoided responding to 39 of the 40 questions I posted.

    Which of you questions does this not address?

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/0VtuVvtSRLw/m/-2UhPFeICAAJ

    Then lied about it and said he answered them all.

    See above.

    Chuckles is a lazy, closed-minded, hate-filled, coward of a juvenile clown and a liar to boot.

    He seems to have gotten under your thin skin, which is a good thing.

    He has no knowledge of the case and as a result, lurkers will gain NO KNOWLEDGE from his posts.

    Just because you can`t doesn`t mean others can`t.

    Using a Bud term, Chuckles is, "a big nothingburger", far lower than whale shit.
    At least that's the way he portrays himself.

    You portray yourself as a lawyer working pro bono for a defendant who isn`t going to trial.

    Nothing would have put Oswald in the chair quicker than having an idiot like you running his defense.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gil Jesus@21:1/5 to All on Sat Nov 11 09:29:34 2023
    On Saturday, November 11, 2023 at 6:04:57 AM UTC-5, Bud wrote:
    < his usual comments and insults >

    Nothing could put Chuckles in the chair quicker than having an idiot like you coming to his defense.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Mon Nov 13 15:56:07 2023
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 17:18:45 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
    wrote:

    On Friday, November 10, 2023 at 4:55:45?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 13:32:33 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
    wrote:

    It will be 60 years before Chickenshit answers this:

    Nobody has said I haven`t.


    Chickenshit thinks I'm "nobody." How cute!


    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    Cue the cowardice...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)