DID THE PROSECTORS DISSECT THE WOUND IN THE THROAT?

You can't answer. The truth would slap a fellow believer... and you'd
be too embarrassed to pass off the same lie that Chickenshit posted.

No. They did not. Not to my knowledge.

Yet a fellow believer, Chickenshit, claims that they did. You're
STILL too cowardly ... you're trying to leave some wriggle room.

YOU KNOW FOR A *FACT* THAT THEY DID NOT DISSECT THE THROAT WOUND!

Tell us coward, why did it take weeks to answer this?

And why can't you answer the rest?

In case you forgot, here it is again:

You've claimed that the "A.B.C.D." in the Autopsy Report is the
description of the *location* of the large head wound.

Yet you refuse time and time again from QUOTING the preceding
paragraph that describes what this ACTUALLY is. Why is that?

You've also claimed that the prosectors dissected the throat wound.

Why do you continue to refuse to cite any evidence for this?

Why have you CONSISTENTLY run away each time I raise this issue?

Now you've quite stupidly insisted that the bullet entered JFK's back,
and exited the back of his head.

More cowardice, more stupidity, more dishonesty.

Are you proud of yourself?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 17:43:55 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
wrote:

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wed, 08 Nov 2023 16:58:54 -0800, Ben Holmes
<Admin@ConspiracyJFKForum.com> wrote:

DID THE PROSECTORS DISSECT THE WOUND IN THE THROAT?

You can't answer. The truth would slap a fellow believer... and you'd
be too embarrassed to pass off the same lie that Chickenshit posted.

No. They did not. Not to my knowledge.

Yet a fellow believer, Chickenshit, claims that they did. You're
STILL too cowardly ... you're trying to leave some wriggle room.

YOU KNOW FOR A *FACT* THAT THEY DID NOT DISSECT THE THROAT WOUND!

Tell us coward, why did it take weeks to answer this?

And why can't you answer the rest?

In case you forgot, here it is again:

You've claimed that the "A.B.C.D." in the Autopsy Report is the
description of the *location* of the large head wound.

Yet you refuse time and time again from QUOTING the preceding
paragraph that describes what this ACTUALLY is. Why is that?

You've also claimed that the prosectors dissected the throat wound.

Why do you continue to refuse to cite any evidence for this?

Why have you CONSISTENTLY run away each time I raise this issue?

Now you've quite stupidly insisted that the bullet entered JFK's back,
and exited the back of his head.

More cowardice, more stupidity, more dishonesty.

Are you proud of yourself?

Huckster Sienzant read this - then simply ran away like the coward he
is.

As he does...

EVERY

SINGLE

TIME!!!

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)