On Saturday, June 11, 2022 at 9:17:25 PM UTC-4, gregr...@outlook.com wrote:...
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/-CUVS3Ytluw/m/zfiyumYXAgAJAre you his designated representative? Do you have a contract to
speak for him? Have you discussed this with him privately or are you
just making this shit up on the fly? Rhetorical question. We both know
the answer.
I hereby designate Bud to speak for me. Happy? You CTs will find
every way to avoid discussing the JFK assassination, won't you?
On Saturday, June 11, 2022 at 8:18:59 PM UTC-7, Hank Sienzant wrote:
On Saturday, June 11, 2022 at 9:17:25 PM UTC-4, gregr...@outlook.com wrote: >...
Are you his designated representative? Do you have a contract to
speak for him? Have you discussed this with him privately or are you
just making this shit up on the fly? Rhetorical question. We both know
the answer.
I hereby designate Bud to speak for me. Happy? You CTs will find
every way to avoid discussing the JFK assassination, won't you? >https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/-CUVS3Ytluw/m/zfiyumYXAgAJ
You designated Chickenshot to speak for you - but when he does, you
refuse to acknowledge or defend it.
**YOU** will find every way to avoid discussing the JFK assassination,
won't you?
Of course, you can't answer... Just as you run from this:
You've claimed that the "A.B.C.D." in the Autopsy Report is the
description of the *location* of the large head wound.
Yet you refuse time and time again from QUOTING the preceding
paragraph that describes what this ACTUALLY is. Why is that?
You've also claimed that the prosectors dissected the throat wound.
Why do you continue to refuse to cite any evidence for this?
Why have you CONSISTENTLY run away each time I raise this issue?
Now you've quite stupidly insisted that the bullet entered JFK's back,
and exited the back of his head.
More cowardice, more stupidity, more dishonesty.
Are you proud of yourself?
Now you've quite stupidly insisted that the bullet entered JFK's back, and exited the back of his head.
On Tuesday, November 7, 2023 at 12:20:04 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
Now you've quite stupidly insisted that the bullet entered JFK's back, and exited the back of his head.No way. Did the "more knowledgeable" one really say that ?
On Tuesday, November 7, 2023 at 12:20:04?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
Now you've quite stupidly insisted that the bullet entered JFK's back, and exited the back of his head.
No way. Did the "more knowledgeable" one really say that ?
ROFLMAO
Quote my reference in context, not out of context. Provide the link, so everyone can see exactly what I said, *in context*.
So you admit...
On Tue, 07 Nov 2023 09:19:59 -0800, Ben Holmes
<Admin@ConspiracyJFKForum.com> wrote:
On Saturday, June 11, 2022 at 8:18:59 PM UTC-7, Hank Sienzant wrote:
On Saturday, June 11, 2022 at 9:17:25 PM UTC-4, gregr...@outlook.com wrote: >>...You designated Chickenshot to speak for you - but when he does, you
Are you his designated representative? Do you have a contract to
speak for him? Have you discussed this with him privately or are you
just making this shit up on the fly? Rhetorical question. We both know >>>> the answer.
I hereby designate Bud to speak for me. Happy? You CTs will find
every way to avoid discussing the JFK assassination, won't you? >>https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/-CUVS3Ytluw/m/zfiyumYXAgAJ >>
refuse to acknowledge or defend it.
**YOU** will find every way to avoid discussing the JFK assassination, >>won't you?
Of course, you can't answer... Just as you run from this:
You've claimed that the "A.B.C.D." in the Autopsy Report is the
description of the *location* of the large head wound.
Yet you refuse time and time again from QUOTING the preceding
paragraph that describes what this ACTUALLY is. Why is that?
You've also claimed that the prosectors dissected the throat wound.
Why do you continue to refuse to cite any evidence for this?
Why have you CONSISTENTLY run away each time I raise this issue?
Now you've quite stupidly insisted that the bullet entered JFK's back,
and exited the back of his head.
More cowardice, more stupidity, more dishonesty.
Are you proud of yourself?
Nailed this prediction... Huckster read this - then ran for the hills
like the coward he is.
On Wednesday, November 8, 2023 at 6:47:27?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Tue, 07 Nov 2023 10:10:03 -0800, Ben Holmes
<Ad...@ConspiracyJFKForum.com> wrote:
On Tue, 07 Nov 2023 09:19:59 -0800, Ben Holmes >>><Ad...@ConspiracyJFKForum.com> wrote:Not only did I nail this prediction - Huckster PROVABLY lied when he
On Saturday, June 11, 2022 at 8:18:59 PM UTC-7, Hank Sienzant wrote:
On Saturday, June 11, 2022 at 9:17:25 PM UTC-4, gregr...@outlook.com wrote:...
You designated Chickenshot to speak for you - but when he does, you >>>>refuse to acknowledge or defend it.Are you his designated representative? Do you have a contract to
speak for him? Have you discussed this with him privately or are you >>>>>> just making this shit up on the fly? Rhetorical question. We both know >>>>>> the answer.
I hereby designate Bud to speak for me. Happy? You CTs will find
every way to avoid discussing the JFK assassination, won't you? >>>>https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/-CUVS3Ytluw/m/zfiyumYXAgAJ >>>>
**YOU** will find every way to avoid discussing the JFK assassination, >>>>won't you?
Of course, you can't answer... Just as you run from this:
You've claimed that the "A.B.C.D." in the Autopsy Report is the >>>>description of the *location* of the large head wound.
Yet you refuse time and time again from QUOTING the preceding
paragraph that describes what this ACTUALLY is. Why is that?
You've also claimed that the prosectors dissected the throat wound.
Why do you continue to refuse to cite any evidence for this?
Why have you CONSISTENTLY run away each time I raise this issue?
Now you've quite stupidly insisted that the bullet entered JFK's back, >>>>and exited the back of his head.
More cowardice, more stupidity, more dishonesty.
Are you proud of yourself?
Nailed this prediction... Huckster read this - then ran for the hills >>>like the coward he is.
whined: "Quote my reference in context, not out of context. Provide
the link, so everyone can see exactly what I said, *in context*." in
this very thread.
Here’s the fuller context:
On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 16:17:23 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
<hsie...@aol.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, November 8, 2023 at 6:47:27?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Tue, 07 Nov 2023 10:10:03 -0800, Ben Holmes
<Ad...@ConspiracyJFKForum.com> wrote:
On Tue, 07 Nov 2023 09:19:59 -0800, Ben Holmes >>><Ad...@ConspiracyJFKForum.com> wrote:Not only did I nail this prediction - Huckster PROVABLY lied when he
On Saturday, June 11, 2022 at 8:18:59 PM UTC-7, Hank Sienzant wrote: >>>>> On Saturday, June 11, 2022 at 9:17:25 PM UTC-4, gregr...@outlook.com wrote:
...
Are you his designated representative? Do you have a contract to >>>>>> speak for him? Have you discussed this with him privately or are you >>>>>> just making this shit up on the fly? Rhetorical question. We both know
the answer.
I hereby designate Bud to speak for me. Happy? You CTs will find
every way to avoid discussing the JFK assassination, won't you? >>>>https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/-CUVS3Ytluw/m/zfiyumYXAgAJ
You designated Chickenshot to speak for you - but when he does, you >>>>refuse to acknowledge or defend it.
**YOU** will find every way to avoid discussing the JFK assassination, >>>>won't you?
Of course, you can't answer... Just as you run from this:
You've claimed that the "A.B.C.D." in the Autopsy Report is the >>>>description of the *location* of the large head wound.
Yet you refuse time and time again from QUOTING the preceding >>>>paragraph that describes what this ACTUALLY is. Why is that?
You've also claimed that the prosectors dissected the throat wound.
Why do you continue to refuse to cite any evidence for this?
Why have you CONSISTENTLY run away each time I raise this issue?
Now you've quite stupidly insisted that the bullet entered JFK's back, >>>>and exited the back of his head.
More cowardice, more stupidity, more dishonesty.
Are you proud of yourself?
Nailed this prediction... Huckster read this - then ran for the hills >>>like the coward he is.
whined: "Quote my reference in context, not out of context. Provide
the link, so everyone can see exactly what I said, *in context*." in
this very thread.
Here’s the fuller context:Stop lying.
You implied I'd not provided your statement, IN CONTEXT, and with a
cite to the original.
You lied.
It's that simple.
And you're still using every trick you can to avoid discussing the JFK
case.
DID THE PROSECTORS DISSECT THE WOUND IN THE THROAT?
You can't answer. The truth would slap a fellow believer... and you'd
be too embarrassed to pass off the same lie that Chickenshit posted.
On Wednesday, November 8, 2023 at 7:23:52?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 16:17:23 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
<hsie...@aol.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, November 8, 2023 at 6:47:27?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:Stop lying.
On Tue, 07 Nov 2023 10:10:03 -0800, Ben Holmes
<Ad...@ConspiracyJFKForum.com> wrote:
On Tue, 07 Nov 2023 09:19:59 -0800, Ben Holmes >>>>><Ad...@ConspiracyJFKForum.com> wrote:Not only did I nail this prediction - Huckster PROVABLY lied when he
On Saturday, June 11, 2022 at 8:18:59 PM UTC-7, Hank Sienzant wrote: >>>>>>> On Saturday, June 11, 2022 at 9:17:25 PM UTC-4, gregr...@outlook.com wrote:
...
Are you his designated representative? Do you have a contract to >>>>>>>> speak for him? Have you discussed this with him privately or are you >>>>>>>> just making this shit up on the fly? Rhetorical question. We both know >>>>>>>> the answer.
I hereby designate Bud to speak for me. Happy? You CTs will find >>>>>>> every way to avoid discussing the JFK assassination, won't you? >>>>>>https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/-CUVS3Ytluw/m/zfiyumYXAgAJ
You designated Chickenshot to speak for you - but when he does, you >>>>>>refuse to acknowledge or defend it.
**YOU** will find every way to avoid discussing the JFK assassination, >>>>>>won't you?
Of course, you can't answer... Just as you run from this:
You've claimed that the "A.B.C.D." in the Autopsy Report is the >>>>>>description of the *location* of the large head wound.
Yet you refuse time and time again from QUOTING the preceding >>>>>>paragraph that describes what this ACTUALLY is. Why is that?
You've also claimed that the prosectors dissected the throat wound. >>>>>>
Why do you continue to refuse to cite any evidence for this?
Why have you CONSISTENTLY run away each time I raise this issue?
Now you've quite stupidly insisted that the bullet entered JFK's back, >>>>>>and exited the back of his head.
More cowardice, more stupidity, more dishonesty.
Are you proud of yourself?
Nailed this prediction... Huckster read this - then ran for the hills >>>>>like the coward he is.
whined: "Quote my reference in context, not out of context. Provide
the link, so everyone can see exactly what I said, *in context*." in
this very thread.
Here’s the fuller context:
No lying. I have the evidence on my side, so I have no need to lie.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 125:12:54 |
| Calls: | 6,662 |
| Files: | 12,212 |
| Messages: | 5,334,851 |