Thanks to Gil - everyone has seen how believers are simply TERRIFIED
of the actual evidence in this case. They can't defend their WCR from
the actual evidence that is supposed to underlie it.
The fact that we can demonstrate the dishonesty & cowardice of
believers by merely forcing them to face the evidence in this case -
AND THE FACT THAT THEY CANNOT DO THE SAME THING TO US, shows lurkers
where the truth lies.
Believers simply *CANNOT* debate - they consistently run away.
And that fact tells the tale.
On Monday, November 6, 2023 at 11:44:15?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
Thanks to Gil - everyone has seen how believers are simply TERRIFIED
of the actual evidence in this case. They can't defend their WCR from
the actual evidence that is supposed to underlie it.
The fact that we can demonstrate the dishonesty & cowardice of
believers by merely forcing them to face the evidence in this case -
AND THE FACT THAT THEY CANNOT DO THE SAME THING TO US, shows lurkers
where the truth lies.
Believers simply *CANNOT* debate - they consistently run away.
And that fact tells the tale.
Thank You, Ben.
And may I say that you have played no small role in exposing their deceptions and lies yourself.
They are a bunch of close-minded individuals who seem to have settled in their "own truth" regarding the assassination.
I've been told in other forums by Lone Nutters that they won't even LOOK at my posts.
The cowards don't even have the courage to read what I post or look at the links I provide.
They have "their truth" and that's that.
I'll keep "hitting them with the evidence", as Harold Weisberg suggested, and watch them shit their pants.
I know you will too,
Keep up the good work.
What I get a big laugh out of is the fact that we keep doing what they
can't do... I post evidential questions (as do you) that they can't answer... and they can't do the same... I refute well-known authors
such as Bugliosi - and believers can't do the same.
On Monday, November 6, 2023 at 12:38:08 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
What I get a big laugh out of is the fact that we keep doing what they can't do... I post evidential questions (as do you) that they can't answer... and they can't do the same... I refute well-known authorsAnd you know you have them by the balls when they resort to insults, like Chuckles, or semantics, like Chickenshit.
such as Bugliosi - and believers can't do the same.
Chickenshit must have been a great kid. Imagine if his parents told him "NO" ?
Response: "What do you mean by No" ?
I'm like you, I just sit there and laugh.
The more vicious the name-calling, the more they tell me I'm winning the debate.
ROFLMAO
Thanks to Gil - everyone has seen how believers are simply TERRIFIED
of the actual evidence in this case. They can't defend their WCR from
the actual evidence that is supposed to underlie it.
The fact that we can demonstrate the dishonesty & cowardice of
believers by merely forcing them to face the evidence in this case -
AND THE FACT THAT THEY CANNOT DO THE SAME THING TO US, shows lurkers
where the truth lies.
Believers simply *CANNOT* debate - they consistently run away.
And that fact tells the tale.
On Monday, November 6, 2023 at 12:45:54?PM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 09:59:57 -0800 (PST), Gil Jesus
On Monday, November 6, 2023 at 12:38:08?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
What I get a big laugh out of is the fact that we keep doing what theyAnd you know you have them by the balls when they resort to insults, like Chuckles, or semantics, like Chickenshit.
can't do... I post evidential questions (as do you) that they can't
answer... and they can't do the same... I refute well-known authors
such as Bugliosi - and believers can't do the same.
Chickenshit must have been a great kid. Imagine if his parents told him "NO" ?
Response: "What do you mean by No" ?
I'm like you, I just sit there and laugh.
The more vicious the name-calling, the more they tell me I'm winning the debate.
ROFLMAO
I would say that you hit the nail on the head.
The questions exposed the dishonesty of the Warren Commission "believers" who responded, and the cowardice of those who didn't.
On Monday, November 6, 2023 at 12:45:54?PM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Monday, November 6, 2023 at 12:38:08?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
What I get a big laugh out of is the fact that we keep doing what they
can't do... I post evidential questions (as do you) that they can't
answer... and they can't do the same... I refute well-known authors
such as Bugliosi - and believers can't do the same.
And you know you have them by the balls when they resort to insults, like Chuckles, or semantics, like Chickenshit.
Chickenshit must have been a great kid. Imagine if his parents told him "NO" ?
Response: "What do you mean by No" ?
I'm like you, I just sit there and laugh.
The more vicious the name-calling, the more they tell me I'm winning the debate.
ROFLMAO
I would say that you hit the nail on the head.
The questions exposed the dishonesty of the Warren Commission "believers" who responded, and the cowardice of those who didn't.
On Monday, November 6, 2023 at 11:44:15 AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
Thanks to Gil - everyone has seen how believers are simply TERRIFIED
of the actual evidence in this case. They can't defend their WCR from
the actual evidence that is supposed to underlie it.
The fact that we can demonstrate the dishonesty & cowardice of
believers by merely forcing them to face the evidence in this case -
AND THE FACT THAT THEY CANNOT DO THE SAME THING TO US, shows lurkers
where the truth lies.
Believers simply *CANNOT* debate - they consistently run away.
And that fact tells the tale.Thank You, Ben.
And may I say that you have played no small role in exposing their deceptions and lies yourself.
They are a bunch of close-minded individuals who seem to have settled in their "own truth" regarding the assassination.
I've been told in other forums by Lone Nutters that they won't even LOOK at my posts.
The cowards don't even have the courage to read what I post or look at the links I provide.
They have "their truth" and that's that.
I'll keep "hitting them with the evidence", as Harold Weisberg suggested, and watch them shit their pants.
I know you will too,
Keep up the good work.
On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 09:59:57 -0800 (PST), Gil Jesus
<gjjma...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, November 6, 2023 at 12:45:54?PM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Monday, November 6, 2023 at 12:38:08?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
What I get a big laugh out of is the fact that we keep doing what they >> > can't do... I post evidential questions (as do you) that they can'tAnd you know you have them by the balls when they resort to insults, like Chuckles, or semantics, like Chickenshit.
answer... and they can't do the same... I refute well-known authors
such as Bugliosi - and believers can't do the same.
Chickenshit must have been a great kid. Imagine if his parents told him "NO" ?
Response: "What do you mean by No" ?
I'm like you, I just sit there and laugh.
The more vicious the name-calling, the more they tell me I'm winning the debate.
ROFLMAO
I would say that you hit the nail on the head.On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 09:59:57 -0800 (PST), Gil Jesus
The questions exposed the dishonesty of the Warren Commission "believers" who responded, and the cowardice of those who didn't.
<gjjma...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, November 6, 2023 at 12:45:54?PM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Monday, November 6, 2023 at 12:38:08?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
What I get a big laugh out of is the fact that we keep doing what they >>> can't do... I post evidential questions (as do you) that they can't
answer... and they can't do the same... I refute well-known authors
such as Bugliosi - and believers can't do the same.
And you know you have them by the balls when they resort to insults, like Chuckles, or semantics, like Chickenshit.
Chickenshit must have been a great kid. Imagine if his parents told him "NO" ?
Response: "What do you mean by No" ?
I'm like you, I just sit there and laugh.
The more vicious the name-calling, the more they tell me I'm winning the debate.
ROFLMAO
I would say that you hit the nail on the head.Au contraire!!! Just because they answer - DOESN'T MEAN THEY AREN'T
The questions exposed the dishonesty of the Warren Commission "believers" who responded, and the cowardice of those who didn't.
COWARDS!
Many, if not most of the questions you asked - THEY KNOW THE CORRECT
ANSWER.
They just refuse to give it.
For example, Huckster Sienzant knows beyond any doubt that the
prosectors never dissected the throat wound - BUT HE'S A COWARD WHO
CANNOT *SAY* THAT.
Thanks to Gil - everyone has seen how believers are simply TERRIFIED
of the actual evidence in this case.
the actual evidence that is supposed to underlie it.
The fact that we can demonstrate the dishonesty & cowardice of
believers by merely forcing them to face the evidence in this case -
AND THE FACT THAT THEY CANNOT DO THE SAME THING TO US, shows lurkers
where the truth lies.
Believers simply *CANNOT* debate - they consistently run away.
And that fact tells the tale.
On Monday, November 6, 2023 at 12:38:08 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
What I get a big laugh out of is the fact that we keep doing what they can't do... I post evidential questions (as do you) that they can't answer... and they can't do the same... I refute well-known authorsAnd you know you have them by the balls when they resort to insults, like Chuckles, or semantics, like Chickenshit.
such as Bugliosi - and believers can't do the same.
Chickenshit must have been a great kid. Imagine if his parents told him "NO" ?
Response: "What do you mean by No" ?
I'm like you, I just sit there and laugh.
The more vicious the name-calling, the more they tell me I'm winning the debate.
ROFLMAO
Thanks to Gil - everyone has seen how believers are simply TERRIFIED
of the actual evidence in this case. They can't defend their WCR from
the actual evidence that is supposed to underlie it.
The fact that we can demonstrate the dishonesty & cowardice of
believers by merely forcing them to face the evidence in this case -
AND THE FACT THAT THEY CANNOT DO THE SAME THING TO US, shows lurkers
where the truth lies.
Believers simply *CANNOT* debate - they consistently run away.
And that fact tells the tale.
On Monday, November 6, 2023 at 11:45:54 AM UTC-6, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Monday, November 6, 2023 at 12:38:08 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:There isn't any VICIOUS name calling, just gentle internet mocking. But you want to set yourself up as the Apostle Paul from the Second Epistle to the Corinthians, beset upon by your enemies for--in your case--trying preach the Gospel of JFK Conspiracy.
What I get a big laugh out of is the fact that we keep doing what they can't do... I post evidential questions (as do you) that they can't answer... and they can't do the same... I refute well-known authorsAnd you know you have them by the balls when they resort to insults, like Chuckles, or semantics, like Chickenshit.
such as Bugliosi - and believers can't do the same.
Chickenshit must have been a great kid. Imagine if his parents told him "NO" ?
Response: "What do you mean by No" ?
I'm like you, I just sit there and laugh.
The more vicious the name-calling, the more they tell me I'm winning the debate.
ROFLMAO
But go ahead and tell yourself you're winning. Sixty years ago this month and you still cannot grasp the concept of historical guilt as opposed to criminal guilt in a courtroom.
As Trump would say, "Sad!"
On Monday, November 6, 2023 at 11:45:54?AM UTC-6, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Monday, November 6, 2023 at 12:38:08?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
What I get a big laugh out of is the fact that we keep doing what theyAnd you know you have them by the balls when they resort to insults, like Chuckles, or semantics, like Chickenshit.
can't do... I post evidential questions (as do you) that they can't
answer... and they can't do the same... I refute well-known authors
such as Bugliosi - and believers can't do the same.
Chickenshit must have been a great kid. Imagine if his parents told him "NO" ?
Response: "What do you mean by No" ?
I'm like you, I just sit there and laugh.
The more vicious the name-calling, the more they tell me I'm winning the debate.
ROFLMAO
But go ahead and tell yourself you're winning.
On Monday, November 6, 2023 at 10:44:15 AM UTC-6, Ben Holmes wrote:
Gil's toady brought this to the group:
Thanks to Gil - everyone has seen how believers are simply TERRIFIEDNobody is "terrified" of the evidence, little fella.
of the actual evidence in this case.
On Monday, November 6, 2023 at 10:44:15 AM UTC-6, Ben Holmes wrote:
Believers simply *CANNOT* debate - they consistently run away.Keep telling yourself that. Yawn.
On Monday, November 6, 2023 at 10:44:15?AM UTC-6, Ben Holmes wrote:
Gil's toady brought this to the group:
Thanks to Gil - everyone has seen how believers are simply TERRIFIED
of the actual evidence in this case.
Nobody is "terrified" of the evidence...
They can't defend their WCR from
the actual evidence that is supposed to underlie it.
Shifting the burden, one of your all-time favorites.
The fact that we can demonstrate the dishonesty & cowardice of
believers by merely forcing them to face the evidence in this case -
The "evidence" was faced in 1963 and 1964 ...
AND THE FACT THAT THEY CANNOT DO THE SAME THING TO US, shows lurkers
where the truth lies.
The fact ...
Believers simply *CANNOT* debate - they consistently run away.
Keep telling yourself that.
And that fact tells the tale.
I'm glad this forum exists. At least nutjobs like you and Gil are
here spewing your nonsense rather than poisoning the water supply or
shooting up a school. Keep posting here, and keep the laughs coming.
Gil to whine in 3...2...1...
On Monday, November 6, 2023 at 11:02:00?PM UTC-5, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
On Monday, November 6, 2023 at 10:44:15?AM UTC-6, Ben Holmes wrote:
Gil's toady brought this to the group:
Thanks to Gil - everyone has seen how believers are simply TERRIFIEDNobody is "terrified" of the evidence, little fella.
of the actual evidence in this case.
Is that why you wouldn't respond to 39 of the 40 questions ?
Because you're not terrified of the evidence ?
Admit it Chuckles, you're a LOSER.
On Monday, November 6, 2023 at 11:02:00?PM UTC-5, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
On Monday, November 6, 2023 at 10:44:15?AM UTC-6, Ben Holmes wrote:
Believers simply *CANNOT* debate - they consistently run away.Keep telling yourself that. Yawn.
Don't have to. The evidence speaks for itself.
CHUCKLES couldn't find the answer to any of the questions, even the "yes" or "no" questions,
and led the group in the category of questions avoided by bowing out of 39 of the 40.
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/uh6y9B38wYw/m/F7Jospt8BgAJ
On Tue, 7 Nov 2023 05:53:34 -0800 (PST), Gil Jesus
<gjjma...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, November 6, 2023 at 11:02:00?PM UTC-5, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
On Monday, November 6, 2023 at 10:44:15?AM UTC-6, Ben Holmes wrote:
Gil's toady brought this to the group:
Thanks to Gil - everyone has seen how believers are simply TERRIFIEDNobody is "terrified" of the evidence, little fella.
of the actual evidence in this case.
Is that why you wouldn't respond to 39 of the 40 questions ?Chuckles likes to read our posts because he's learning the facts for
Because you're not terrified of the evidence ?
Admit it Chuckles, you're a LOSER.
the first time. He doesn't know the case evidence.
On Tuesday, November 7, 2023 at 3:45:39 PM UTC-5, BT George wrote:
More likely, he just doesn't need to bother, since it has little or no bearing on you CT beliefs and trollish behaviors.Oh look, another insult from a coward who didn't have the balls to TRY to answer any of the questions.
Speaking of having no balls, is that you, Christina Strimbu ?
LOL.
More likely, he just doesn't need to bother, since it has little or no bearing on you CT beliefs and trollish behaviors.
On Monday, November 6, 2023 at 11:02:00 PM UTC-5, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
On Monday, November 6, 2023 at 10:44:15 AM UTC-6, Ben Holmes wrote:
Gil's toady brought this to the group:Is that why you wouldn't respond to 39 of the 40 questions ?
Thanks to Gil - everyone has seen how believers are simply TERRIFIEDNobody is "terrified" of the evidence, little fella.
of the actual evidence in this case.
Because you're not terrified of the evidence ?
Admit it Chuckles, you're a LOSER.
On Tuesday, November 7, 2023 at 7:53:35?AM UTC-6, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Monday, November 6, 2023 at 11:02:00?PM UTC-5, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
On Monday, November 6, 2023 at 10:44:15?AM UTC-6, Ben Holmes wrote:Is that why you wouldn't respond to 39 of the 40 questions ?
Gil's toady brought this to the group:
Thanks to Gil - everyone has seen how believers are simply TERRIFIEDNobody is "terrified" of the evidence, little fella.
of the actual evidence in this case.
Because you're not terrified of the evidence ?
I answered all of them.
Admit it Chuckles, you're a LOSER.
On Tuesday, November 7, 2023 at 7:53:35 AM UTC-6, Gil Jesus wrote:
Is that why you wouldn't respond to 39 of the 40 questions ?I answered all of them.
Because you're not terrified of the evidence ?
On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 06:29:24 -0800 (PST), Chuck Schuyler <chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, November 7, 2023 at 7:53:35?AM UTC-6, Gil Jesus wrote:
Gil's toady brought this to the group:Is that why you wouldn't respond to 39 of the 40 questions ?
Thanks to Gil - everyone has seen how believers are simply TERRIFIED >>>> of the actual evidence in this case.Nobody is "terrified" of the evidence, little fella.
Because you're not terrified of the evidence ?
I answered all of them.You're simply proving yourself a liar again...
On Thursday, November 9, 2023 at 10:39:28?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 06:29:24 -0800 (PST), Chuck Schuyler
<chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, November 7, 2023 at 7:53:35?AM UTC-6, Gil Jesus wrote:You're simply proving yourself a liar again...
Gil's toady brought this to the group:Is that why you wouldn't respond to 39 of the 40 questions ?
Thanks to Gil - everyone has seen how believers are simply TERRIFIED >>>>>> of the actual evidence in this case.Nobody is "terrified" of the evidence, little fella.
Because you're not terrified of the evidence ?
I answered all of them.
Chuckles is trying to take over Corbett's place as the group pathological liar.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 297 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 102:47:22 |
Calls: | 6,660 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 12,209 |
Messages: | 5,335,063 |