Not surprisingly, as the 60th anniversary of the JFK assassination approaches, a handful of new documentaries have been produced and I'm sure some of
the cable channels will replay some of the old ones. This is hardly an indication of a renewed interest in the subject. What we are going to see is
a fraction of what was produced for the 50th anniversary which in turn was
less than the 40th anniversary produced. The 40th anniversary was probably
the peak because by then there were far more niche cable channels around
that there were for previous anniversaries. I think it was The History Channel which ran NBC's entire coverage of that weekend from their earliest bulletins to the burial service at Arlington National Cemetary. I think they even played it beginning at the exact time on Friday afternoon that the news broke. I always regretted not recording it although logistically it would have been
very difficult as I would have to replace the VHS tapes every 6 hours even recording at the lowest resolution. Maybe it's out on YouTube still or maybe DVP has it in his vast archives.

The one that has me interested is a 3 part documentary that will play on NatGeo beginning on November 5. One of the people interviewed was Clint Hill.
No telling how good or bad it will be until I see it.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tuesday, October 31, 2023 at 3:29:41 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:

On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 10:31:14 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
<geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:

Not surprisingly...

Not to

idiots.

critics.

It's VERY surprising to the morons who keep claiming that there's no
longer any interest in a 60+ year old murder...

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 10:31:14 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett <geowright1963@gmail.com> wrote:

Not surprisingly...

Not to critics.

It's VERY surprising to the morons who keep claiming that there's no
longer any interest in a 60+ year old murder...

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tuesday, October 31, 2023 at 3:45:33 PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:

On Tuesday, October 31, 2023 at 3:29:41 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:

On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 10:31:14 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett <geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:

Not surprisingly...

Not to

idiots.

Benny can't come to grips with the fact the JFK assassination is of interest to a niche special
interest group. Whereas in the days when broadcast TV ruled the world, a program had to
draw many millions of viewers, now with cable, streaming, podcast, and social media options,
programs are being produced that are directed at a few thousand subscribers. Any schmuck
with a webcam can create content. Even someone like Gil.

The NatGeo documentary will likely draw a decent sized audience. It's been advertised for
months, so an audience of tens of thousands is likely. Perhaps even six figures. In a country of
330 million people, about 10 million more if you count illegal immigrants, that's not much of an
audience. The opening episode will be up against Sunday night football game which will draw
hundreds of times more viewers. Of course, nothing draws well when it is up against the NFL.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tuesday, October 31, 2023 at 6:45:04 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:

On Tuesday, October 31, 2023 at 3:45:33 PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:

On Tuesday, October 31, 2023 at 3:29:41 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:

On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 10:31:14 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett <geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:

Not surprisingly...

Not to

idiots.

Benny can't come to grips with the fact the JFK assassination is of interest to a niche special
interest group.

And in the next twenty years almost that entire niche group will be dead.

Whereas in the days when broadcast TV ruled the world, a program had to
draw many millions of viewers, now with cable, streaming, podcast, and social media options,
programs are being produced that are directed at a few thousand subscribers. Any schmuck
with a webcam can create content. Even someone like Gil.

The NatGeo documentary will likely draw a decent sized audience. It's been advertised for
months, so an audience of tens of thousands is likely. Perhaps even six figures. In a country of
330 million people, about 10 million more if you count illegal immigrants, that's not much of an
audience. The opening episode will be up against Sunday night football game which will draw
hundreds of times more viewers. Of course, nothing draws well when it is up against the NFL.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tuesday, October 31, 2023 at 7:18:52 PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:

On Tuesday, October 31, 2023 at 6:45:04 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:

On Tuesday, October 31, 2023 at 3:45:33 PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:

On Tuesday, October 31, 2023 at 3:29:41 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:

On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 10:31:14 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett <geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:

Not surprisingly...

Not to

idiots.

Benny can't come to grips with the fact the JFK assassination is of interest to a niche special
interest group.

And in the next twenty years almost that entire niche group will be dead.

For the millennials and Gen-Z, the JFK assassination is as relevant as the McKinley assassination
was to our generation. It happened a long time ago and means nothing to current affairs.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tuesday, October 31, 2023 at 3:29:41 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:

It's VERY surprising to the morons who keep claiming that there's no longer any interest in a 60+ year old murder...

This is what they claim and yet their mere presence here seems to prove that wrong.
There's no interest but they just can't leave this newsgroup alone, can they ? They're nothing but a bunch of LIARS.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 16:18:50 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
wrote:

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 15:45:03 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett <geowright1963@gmail.com> wrote:

Benny can't come to grips with the fact the JFK assassination is of interest to a niche special
interest group.

Corbutt can't get me out of his mind. He's obsessed with me.

Corbutt can't explain the evidence showing otherwise. Watch folks, as
Corbutt simply runs away....

The NatGeo documentary ...

There you go. The proof that you're a moron.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wed, 1 Nov 2023 04:56:02 -0700 (PDT), Gil Jesus
<gjjmail1202@gmail.com> wrote:

On Tuesday, October 31, 2023 at 3:29:41?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:

It's VERY surprising to the morons who keep claiming that there's no longer any interest in a 60+ year old murder...

This is what they claim and yet their mere presence here seems to prove that wrong.
There's no interest but they just can't leave this newsgroup alone, can they ? >They're nothing but a bunch of LIARS.

Indeed. They prove their dishonesty & cowardice in virtually every
post. They can't help themselves.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wednesday, November 1, 2023 at 7:56:04 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:

On Tuesday, October 31, 2023 at 3:29:41 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:

It's VERY surprising to the morons who keep claiming that there's no longer any interest in a 60+ year old murder...

This is what they claim and yet their mere presence here seems to prove that wrong.
There's no interest but they just can't leave this newsgroup alone, can they ?
They're nothing but a bunch of LIARS.

Our presence here indicates we are part of that very small interest group that still gives a shit
about JFK's assassination. I find it an interesting subject with all the various subplots, but as
murder mystery, it's pretty lame. The perpetrator was revealed on page one.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wed, 1 Nov 2023 06:13:38 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
<geowright1963@gmail.com> wrote:

On Wednesday, November 1, 2023 at 7:56:04?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:

On Tuesday, October 31, 2023 at 3:29:41?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:

It's VERY surprising to the morons who keep claiming that there's no longer any interest in a 60+ year old murder...

This is what they claim and yet their mere presence here seems to prove that wrong.
There's no interest but they just can't leave this newsgroup alone, can they ?
They're nothing but a bunch of LIARS.

Our presence here indicates...

That you're lying when you keep insisting that there's no interest in
the JFK case.

The upcoming documentary also proves this.

I find it an interesting subject with all the various subplots, but as
murder mystery, it's pretty lame. The perpetrator was revealed on page one.

Yet you can't defend that idea.

All you can do is whine about what we critics point out.

Sad, isn't it?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wednesday, November 1, 2023 at 9:03:07 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:

On Wed, 1 Nov 2023 04:36:46 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
<geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:

For the millennials and Gen-Z, the JFK assassination is as relevant as the McKinley assassination
was to our generation. It happened a long time ago and means nothing to current affairs.

So too Jack the Ripper.

Yes, the interest in that diminishes yearly also. The old white men obsessed with such things are dying off.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wednesday, November 1, 2023 at 10:04:47 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:

On Wed, 1 Nov 2023 06:13:38 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
<geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Wednesday, November 1, 2023 at 7:56:04?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:

On Tuesday, October 31, 2023 at 3:29:41?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:

It's VERY surprising to the morons who keep claiming that there's no longer any interest in a 60+ year old murder...

This is what they claim and yet their mere presence here seems to prove that wrong.
There's no interest but they just can't leave this newsgroup alone, can they ?
They're nothing but a bunch of LIARS.

Our presence here indicates...

That you're lying when you keep insisting that there's no interest in
the JFK case.

When you have to lie about his position you only prove yourself to be a liar.

The upcoming documentary also proves this.

I find it an interesting subject with all the various subplots, but as >murder mystery, it's pretty lame. The perpetrator was revealed on page one. Yet you can't defend that idea.

Against what?

All you can do is whine about what we critics point out.

You see going nowhere as progress.

Sad, isn't it?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wednesday, November 1, 2023 at 2:01:50 PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:

On Wednesday, November 1, 2023 at 10:04:47 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:

On Wed, 1 Nov 2023 06:13:38 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett <geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Wednesday, November 1, 2023 at 7:56:04?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:

On Tuesday, October 31, 2023 at 3:29:41?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:

It's VERY surprising to the morons who keep claiming that there's no longer any interest in a 60+ year old murder...

This is what they claim and yet their mere presence here seems to prove that wrong.
There's no interest but they just can't leave this newsgroup alone, can they ?
They're nothing but a bunch of LIARS.

Our presence here indicates...

That you're lying when you keep insisting that there's no interest in
the JFK case.

When you have to lie about his position you only prove yourself to be a liar.

The upcoming documentary also proves this.

I find it an interesting subject with all the various subplots, but as >murder mystery, it's pretty lame. The perpetrator was revealed on page one.

Yet you can't defend that idea.

Against what?

All you can do is whine about what we critics point out.

You see going nowhere as progress.

Sad, isn't it?

Benny responds to almost every post I make while I haven't responded directly to one of his
in many months and mention him rarely in passing, and he claims I'm the one obsessed with
him. Too funny.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wed, 1 Nov 2023 11:09:37 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
<geowright1963@gmail.com> wrote:

Benny responds to almost every post I make while I haven't responded directly to one of his
in many months and mention him rarely in passing, and he claims I'm the one obsessed with
him. Too funny.

Still obsessed with me. Gotta love it!

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wed, 1 Nov 2023 10:59:45 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
wrote:

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)