https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MM-rqHroIDs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MM-rqHroIDs
On Monday, October 30, 2023 at 6:29:02?PM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MM-rqHroIDs
Looks like somebody is polishing up the old turds...
The trailer did not indicate who those doctors were that were discussing the wounds. If that
panel discussion took place recently, none of the doctors on that panel looked old enough to
have been in the ER the day of the assassination. Even a young resident in his mid to late
twenties on the day of the assassination would be well into his eighties by now. None of that
panel looked nearly that old which means they are forming opinions based on comments made
by the ER team, not on any firsthand observations.
On Tuesday, October 31, 2023 at 1:13:47?PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
The trailer did not indicate who those doctors were that were discussing the wounds. If that
panel discussion took place recently, none of the doctors on that panel looked old enough to
have been in the ER the day of the assassination. Even a young resident in his mid to late
twenties on the day of the assassination would be well into his eighties by now. None of that
panel looked nearly that old which means they are forming opinions based on comments made
by the ER team, not on any firsthand observations.
I'm sure that they just went out and picked up some winos for a panel chat. >Idiot.
On Tuesday, October 31, 2023 at 1:13:47 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
The trailer did not indicate who those doctors were that were discussing the wounds. If thatI'm sure that they just went out and picked up some winos for a panel chat. Idiot.
panel discussion took place recently, none of the doctors on that panel looked old enough to
have been in the ER the day of the assassination. Even a young resident in his mid to late
twenties on the day of the assassination would be well into his eighties by now. None of that
panel looked nearly that old which means they are forming opinions based on comments made
by the ER team, not on any firsthand observations.
On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 15:29:00 -0700 (PDT), Gil Jesus
<gjjma...@gmail.com> wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MM-rqHroIDs
I thought this was all over... ancient history, no-one's interested...
Why are new documentaries coming out???
I guess Chuckles got it wrong. :)
On Tuesday, October 31, 2023 at 1:13:47 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
The trailer did not indicate who those doctors were that were discussing the wounds. If thatI'm sure that they just went out and picked up some winos for a panel chat. Idiot.
panel discussion took place recently, none of the doctors on that panel looked old enough to
have been in the ER the day of the assassination. Even a young resident in his mid to late
twenties on the day of the assassination would be well into his eighties by now. None of that
panel looked nearly that old which means they are forming opinions based on comments made
by the ER team, not on any firsthand observations.
Didn't some of the Parkland doctors get a chance on the PBS program NOVA in 1988 to review the autopsy photos and confirm the wounds essentially were the same as what they saw when they were trying to save JFK's life at the hospital?
On Wednesday, November 1, 2023 at 10:54:25 AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Tuesday, October 31, 2023 at 1:13:47 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:Didn't some of the Parkland doctors get a chance on the PBS program NOVA in 1988 to review the autopsy photos and confirm the wounds essentially were the same as what they saw when they were trying to save JFK's life at the hospital?
The trailer did not indicate who those doctors were that were discussing the wounds. If thatI'm sure that they just went out and picked up some winos for a panel chat.
panel discussion took place recently, none of the doctors on that panel looked old enough to
have been in the ER the day of the assassination. Even a young resident in his mid to late
twenties on the day of the assassination would be well into his eighties by now. None of that
panel looked nearly that old which means they are forming opinions based on comments made
by the ER team, not on any firsthand observations.
Idiot.
On Wednesday, November 1, 2023 at 10:54:25 AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:25 years later is better than what they originally said?
On Tuesday, October 31, 2023 at 1:13:47 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:Didn't some of the Parkland doctors get a chance on the PBS program NOVA in 1988 to review the autopsy photos and confirm the wounds essentially were the same as what they saw when they were trying to save JFK's life at the hospital?
The trailer did not indicate who those doctors were that were discussing the wounds. If thatI'm sure that they just went out and picked up some winos for a panel chat.
panel discussion took place recently, none of the doctors on that panel looked old enough to
have been in the ER the day of the assassination. Even a young resident in his mid to late
twenties on the day of the assassination would be well into his eighties by now. None of that
panel looked nearly that old which means they are forming opinions based on comments made
by the ER team, not on any firsthand observations.
Idiot.
Didn't some of the Parkland doctors get a chance on the PBS program NOVA in 1988 to review the autopsy photos and confirm the wounds essentially were the same as what they saw when they were trying to save JFK's life at the hospital?
On Wednesday, November 1, 2023 at 11:34:52 PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
Didn't some of the Parkland doctors get a chance on the PBS program NOVA in 1988 to review the autopsy photos and confirm the wounds essentially were the same as what they saw when they were trying to save JFK's life at the hospital?Are these the same doctors ?
On Tuesday, October 31, 2023 at 8:33:05?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 15:29:00 -0700 (PDT), Gil Jesus
<gjjma...@gmail.com> wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MM-rqHroIDs
I thought this was all over... ancient history, no-one's interested...
Why are new documentaries coming out???
I guess Chuckles got it wrong. :)
I never said ...
On Wednesday, November 1, 2023 at 11:54:25?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Tuesday, October 31, 2023 at 1:13:47?PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
The trailer did not indicate who those doctors were that were discussing the wounds. If thatI'm sure that they just went out and picked up some winos for a panel chat. >> Idiot.
panel discussion took place recently, none of the doctors on that panel looked old enough to
have been in the ER the day of the assassination. Even a young resident in his mid to late
twenties on the day of the assassination would be well into his eighties by now. None of that
panel looked nearly that old which means they are forming opinions based on comments made
by the ER team, not on any firsthand observations.
The only name I recognized was Robert McClelland ...
On Wednesday, November 1, 2023 at 10:54:25?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Tuesday, October 31, 2023 at 1:13:47?PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
The trailer did not indicate who those doctors were that were discussing the wounds. If thatI'm sure that they just went out and picked up some winos for a panel chat. >> Idiot.
panel discussion took place recently, none of the doctors on that panel looked old enough to
have been in the ER the day of the assassination. Even a young resident in his mid to late
twenties on the day of the assassination would be well into his eighties by now. None of that
panel looked nearly that old which means they are forming opinions based on comments made
by the ER team, not on any firsthand observations.
Didn't ...
On Wednesday, November 1, 2023 at 11:34:52?PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
On Wednesday, November 1, 2023 at 10:54:25?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Tuesday, October 31, 2023 at 1:13:47?PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:Didn't ...
The trailer did not indicate who those doctors were that were discussing the wounds. If thatI'm sure that they just went out and picked up some winos for a panel chat. >>> Idiot.
panel discussion took place recently, none of the doctors on that panel looked old enough to
have been in the ER the day of the assassination. Even a young resident in his mid to late
twenties on the day of the assassination would be well into his eighties by now. None of that
panel looked nearly that old which means they are forming opinions based on comments made
by the ER team, not on any firsthand observations.
On Thursday, November 2, 2023 at 7:21:37?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Wednesday, November 1, 2023 at 11:34:52?PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote: >> > Didn't some of the Parkland doctors get a chance on the PBS program NOVA in 1988 to review the autopsy photos and confirm the wounds essentially were the same as what they saw when they were trying to save JFK's life at the hospital?
Are these the same doctors ?
The trailer stated "They have not deviated from what the observed 60 years ago" so I thought it
would be interesting to see what they had to say 60 years ago. Here are a couple accounts as
testified to under oath before the Warren Commission:
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 297 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 101:04:44 |
Calls: | 6,659 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 12,209 |
Messages: | 5,334,859 |