The questions were originally directed to the "more knoweldgeable" one, Hank Sienzant. But since the trolls can't resist sticking their two cents in, I thought it would be fun to tally up their scores in an effort to see how much knowledge they really
have on the subject.

It's been 5 days since I posted questions 1-5, so I've gone back and reviewed the responses to the questions.

If their name is not listed, that means that they chose not to respond to the question.

Since anything more than the one response with the correct answer is unacceptable, scores are determined by dividing the correct answer by the number of responses.

Grades are determined by scores:
A 90-100
B 80-89
C 70-79
D 65-69
F below 65

How did the trolls fare ?

Question # 1

BUD
Responses - 1
Correct answers - 0
Score - 0
Grade - F

CORBETT
Responses - 1
Correct answers - 0
Score - 0
Grade - F

Question # 2

BUD
Responses - 1
Correct answers - 0
Score - 0
Grade - F

CORBETT
Responses - 4
Correct answers - 0
Score - 0
Grade - F

RECIP ( JERRY )
Responses - 1
Correct answers - 0
Score - 0
Grade - F

Question # 3

CORBETT
Responses - 1
Correct answers - 0
Score - 0
Grade - F

Question # 4

BUD
Responses - 2
Correct answers - 0
Score - 0
Grade - F

CORBETT
Responses - 3
Correct answers - 0
Score - 0
Grade - F

Question # 5

BUD
Responses - 1
Correct answers - 0
Score - 0
Grade - F

CORBETT
Responses - 1
Correct answers - 0
Score - 0
Grade - F
--------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS FOR QUESTIONS 1-5

Bud-- 5 responses, 0 correct answers, 0 score, grade F
Corbett-- 10 responses, 0 correct answers, 0 score, grade F
recip-- 1 response, 0 correct answers, 0 score, grade F

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Saturday, October 28, 2023 at 7:46:33 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:

The questions were originally directed to the "more knoweldgeable" one, Hank Sienzant. But since the trolls can't resist sticking their two cents in, I thought it would be fun to tally up their scores in an effort to see how much knowledge they really

have on the subject.

It's been 5 days since I posted questions 1-5, so I've gone back and reviewed the responses to the questions.

If their name is not listed, that means that they chose not to respond to the question.

Since anything more than the one response with the correct answer is unacceptable, scores are determined by dividing the correct answer by the number of responses.

Grades are determined by scores:
A 90-100
B 80-89
C 70-79
D 65-69
F below 65

How did the trolls fare ?

Question # 1

BUD
Responses - 1
Correct answers - 0
Score - 0
Grade - F

CORBETT
Responses - 1
Correct answers - 0
Score - 0
Grade - F

Question # 2

BUD
Responses - 1
Correct answers - 0
Score - 0
Grade - F

CORBETT
Responses - 4
Correct answers - 0
Score - 0
Grade - F

RECIP ( JERRY )
Responses - 1
Correct answers - 0
Score - 0
Grade - F

Question # 3

CORBETT
Responses - 1
Correct answers - 0
Score - 0
Grade - F

Question # 4

BUD
Responses - 2
Correct answers - 0
Score - 0
Grade - F

CORBETT
Responses - 3
Correct answers - 0
Score - 0
Grade - F

Question # 5

BUD
Responses - 1
Correct answers - 0
Score - 0
Grade - F

CORBETT
Responses - 1
Correct answers - 0
Score - 0
Grade - F --------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS FOR QUESTIONS 1-5

Bud-- 5 responses, 0 correct answers, 0 score, grade F
Corbett-- 10 responses, 0 correct answers, 0 score, grade F
recip-- 1 response, 0 correct answers, 0 score, grade F

Oh, goody. The class dunce is handing out grades to the smart kids.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Saturday, October 28, 2023 at 8:56:32 AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:

On Saturday, October 28, 2023 at 7:46:33 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:

The questions were originally directed to the "more knoweldgeable" one, Hank Sienzant. But since the trolls can't resist sticking their two cents in, I thought it would be fun to tally up their scores in an effort to see how much knowledge they

really have on the subject.

It's been 5 days since I posted questions 1-5, so I've gone back and reviewed the responses to the questions.

If their name is not listed, that means that they chose not to respond to the question.

Since anything more than the one response with the correct answer is unacceptable, scores are determined by dividing the correct answer by the number of responses.

Grades are determined by scores:
A 90-100
B 80-89
C 70-79
D 65-69
F below 65

How did the trolls fare ?

Question # 1

BUD
Responses - 1
Correct answers - 0
Score - 0
Grade - F

CORBETT
Responses - 1
Correct answers - 0
Score - 0
Grade - F

Question # 2

BUD
Responses - 1
Correct answers - 0
Score - 0
Grade - F

CORBETT
Responses - 4
Correct answers - 0
Score - 0
Grade - F

RECIP ( JERRY )
Responses - 1
Correct answers - 0
Score - 0
Grade - F

Question # 3

CORBETT
Responses - 1
Correct answers - 0
Score - 0
Grade - F

Question # 4

BUD
Responses - 2
Correct answers - 0
Score - 0
Grade - F

CORBETT
Responses - 3
Correct answers - 0
Score - 0
Grade - F

Question # 5

BUD
Responses - 1
Correct answers - 0
Score - 0
Grade - F

CORBETT
Responses - 1
Correct answers - 0
Score - 0
Grade - F -------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTALS FOR QUESTIONS 1-5

Bud-- 5 responses, 0 correct answers, 0 score, grade F
Corbett-- 10 responses, 0 correct answers, 0 score, grade F
recip-- 1 response, 0 correct answers, 0 score, grade F

Oh, goody. The class dunce is handing out grades to the smart kids.

He could go to each post and show how the answers given were incorrect.

Oh, that`s right, he can`t do that.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Sat, 28 Oct 2023 04:46:31 -0700 (PDT), Gil Jesus
<gjjmail1202@gmail.com> wrote:

The questions were originally directed to the "more knoweldgeable" one, Hank Sienzant. But since the trolls can't resist sticking their two cents in, I thought it would be fun to tally up their scores in an effort to see how much knowledge they really

have on the subject.

It's been 5 days since I posted questions 1-5, so I've gone back and reviewed the responses to the questions.

If their name is not listed, that means that they chose not to respond to the question.

Since anything more than the one response with the correct answer is unacceptable, scores are determined by dividing the correct answer by the number of responses.

Grades are determined by scores:
A 90-100
B 80-89
C 70-79
D 65-69
F below 65

How did the trolls fare ?

Question # 1

BUD
Responses - 1
Correct answers - 0
Score - 0
Grade - F

CORBETT
Responses - 1
Correct answers - 0
Score - 0
Grade - F

Question # 2

BUD
Responses - 1
Correct answers - 0
Score - 0
Grade - F

CORBETT
Responses - 4
Correct answers - 0
Score - 0
Grade - F

RECIP ( JERRY )
Responses - 1
Correct answers - 0
Score - 0
Grade - F

Question # 3

CORBETT
Responses - 1
Correct answers - 0
Score - 0
Grade - F

Question # 4

BUD
Responses - 2
Correct answers - 0
Score - 0
Grade - F

CORBETT
Responses - 3
Correct answers - 0
Score - 0
Grade - F

Question # 5

BUD
Responses - 1
Correct answers - 0
Score - 0
Grade - F

CORBETT
Responses - 1
Correct answers - 0
Score - 0
Grade - F >--------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS FOR QUESTIONS 1-5

Bud-- 5 responses, 0 correct answers, 0 score, grade F
Corbett-- 10 responses, 0 correct answers, 0 score, grade F
recip-- 1 response, 0 correct answers, 0 score, grade F

Mayby grade on a curve? ROTFLMAO!!!

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Sat, 28 Oct 2023 05:56:30 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett <geowright1963@gmail.com> wrote:

On Saturday, October 28, 2023 at 7:46:33?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:

The questions were originally directed to the "more knoweldgeable" one, Hank Sienzant. But since the trolls can't resist sticking their two cents in, I thought it would be fun to tally up their scores in an effort to see how much knowledge they really

have on the subject.

It's been 5 days since I posted questions 1-5, so I've gone back and reviewed the responses to the questions.

If their name is not listed, that means that they chose not to respond to the question.

Since anything more than the one response with the correct answer is unacceptable, scores are determined by dividing the correct answer by the number of responses.

Grades are determined by scores:
A 90-100
B 80-89
C 70-79
D 65-69
F below 65

How did the trolls fare ?

Question # 1

BUD
Responses - 1
Correct answers - 0
Score - 0
Grade - F

CORBETT
Responses - 1
Correct answers - 0
Score - 0
Grade - F

Question # 2

BUD
Responses - 1
Correct answers - 0
Score - 0
Grade - F

CORBETT
Responses - 4
Correct answers - 0
Score - 0
Grade - F

RECIP ( JERRY )
Responses - 1
Correct answers - 0
Score - 0
Grade - F

Question # 3

CORBETT
Responses - 1
Correct answers - 0
Score - 0
Grade - F

Question # 4

BUD
Responses - 2
Correct answers - 0
Score - 0
Grade - F

CORBETT
Responses - 3
Correct answers - 0
Score - 0
Grade - F

Question # 5

BUD
Responses - 1
Correct answers - 0
Score - 0
Grade - F

CORBETT
Responses - 1
Correct answers - 0
Score - 0
Grade - F
--------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS FOR QUESTIONS 1-5

Bud-- 5 responses, 0 correct answers, 0 score, grade F
Corbett-- 10 responses, 0 correct answers, 0 score, grade F
recip-- 1 response, 0 correct answers, 0 score, grade F

Oh, goody. The class dunce is handing out grades to the smart kids.

The smart kids would have answered correctly - it's completely unknown
who found the jacket.

Which, as any smart kid would know, plays havoc with any chain of
custody.

But you clearly *aren't* a smart kid - as you didn't know the answer,
and you flat lied and claimed that there was no issues with chain of
custody on any of the evidence in this case.

Tell us - can you name any evidence in this case that DOES have a
clear chain of custody? (There are answers to this one...)

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Sat, 28 Oct 2023 08:15:44 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
wrote:


So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)